Sentences with phrase «sexual person so»

I'm a very intimate and sexual person so if you're not I'm not for you.

Not exact matches

Polish scientists have shown that male and female preferences for a height difference (known scientifically as sexual dimorphism) change based on how tall they are, perhaps so that people can widen their own dating pool.

«That's why it's so important for companies to have several ways for people to report sexual harassment, to encourage people to come forward when they see something, and ensure that the report will be taken seriously.»

What attracted me to the book was an interview I read with Vance in which he described how liberal whites went so far to ensure they never offended any people of color or people with different sexual orientations but were quick to pass judgment on people from flyover states.

For example, if you wanted to keep track of all your sexual partners so that you could notify them in case you contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), it would help to be able to input people's names, Kavaler said, although she noted that this would raise privacy concerns.

Under this law, it is illegal to distribute sexual images or videos of someone without his or her consent, so long as it is intended to cause serious emotional distress and so long as the person depicted experiences distress.

So many people are dealing with the reality check of sexual issues and problems, and because of the stigma we've created surrounding this important topic, many couples end up needlessly suffering for far too long.

But there can be specific Church forms of homophobia too: pressurising us to change our sexual orientation (although people who want to seek change in their orientation should be free to do so, and some find that their sexuality does change); saying that gay people will go to hell; not permitting us to work with youth or children (assuming gay people are more likely to be predatory or paedophiles); and holding us back from ministry roles.

Many parents are genuinely worried: certainly they would rather know when their young people are involved in sexual activity and accessing the morning - after pill but, if this is what it takes to avoid their thirteen year - old daughter getting pregnant, then so be it.

There are few things as deep to a person's self - identity as their sexual orientation and gender identity... and few treasures held so deeply.

Psychologists report that people who sexually assault others do not do so because they need an outlet for their sexual frustration (there are many easier means of accomplishing that).

However, we are all created as sexual beings and sex, or sexuality, also has a much wider sense in which the love held within the soul is expressed through our sexuality in warmth, affection and tenderness, without an erotic element, and done so in an appropriate way depending on the persons involved.

The policies that are routinely sold to our children rest on the contention that all people have the right to confidentiality and therefore we must have confidential access to sexual health services, to abortion and so on.

So, contrary to what the cartoon suggests, the ONLY reason people promote the idea of sexual purity is because of biblical authority.

Indeed those people who are so afraid of exploring a new basis for sexual morality might well examine their own unconscious motivation, for fear frequently masks desire which is regarded as unacceptable; when the superstructure of repression is threatened that fear becomes violent anger.

«It is not by imitating the opposite sex, nor by seeking to dominate it, but by learning from it that a person grows in that sexual identity which is so important for maturity in life».

I've heard about loving people through beatings and muggings - but there is something so dignity shredding about sexual violence, that the thought of it makes me want to forget I ever read the sermon on the mount.

I object to Stanton Jones» use of the words homosexuality and heterosexuality as equivalent descriptions of different kinds of sexual behavior, because doing so ignores the facts that 1) «heterosexuality» is the result of the allocation of genetic material at conception that determines which reproductive organs people are born with» male or female» and 2) «homosexuality» is sexual action by people who are heterosexual.

«And so biblical modesty isn't about managing the sexual impulses of other people; it's about cultivating humility, propriety and deference within ourselves.»

To Sullivan's mind it is interpersonal relationships, not the flow of sexual energy, that play the crucial role in the formation of ones personality, and continue to do so well beyond the limited timeframe envisioned by Freud.7 The first crucial stage in a person's development Sullivan terms infancy which lasts from birth up to the appearance of articulate speech.

One bishop, in his self - serving statement of resignation after an unsavory incident with a teenage boy was revealed, went so far as to suggest that his problem was that he was a particularly caring and intelligent person who was attuned to the latest thinking about matters sexual.

We may discover such places, too, in our ambivalences about the «categories» of persons with whom we share, happily or unhappily, race, nation, religion, gender, caste, sexual orientation, class, and so forth.

So she dismisses the argument, which she says she hears advocates of gay ordination making, that people can not be expected to resist their hard - wired sexual desires.

One of the reasons why I am so insistent on this point is that the Church is up against very powerful social influences which promote the «values» of the «sexual revolution», undermining the capacity for young Catholics, and young people generally, to hear and receive the teaching of the Church.

But, as Grisez points out, «this specific aspect of self - integration... is precisely the aspect necessary so that the bodily union of sexual intercourse will be a communion of persons, as marital intercourse is.»

At that point, the person has stated their belief, their intentions are to never have gay sex, and so therapy (ISSI calls is sexual identity therapy, or SIT) begins.

So, either they mean sin is arbitrary, and God is arbitrarily against gay people only, or they doubt the sincerity of our love or the health of our relationships... no, no judgement there...) Love should always come before or instead of judgement, but not because sexual sins aren't significant.

So, I sought out a therapist who helped people dealing with sexual issues that weren't in alignment with their spiritual beliefs.

It was a decade ago, so sexual abuse was still very much kept under wraps in institutions, and people were still being told to forgive the sin, look at all the good they've done, don't judge....

NP: Excellent point about a gay person struggling against «centuries of interpretation, theology, cultural norms, popular opinion, inherited sexual mores and so much more that a straight person has the luxury of summoning.»

So the male, who is not necessary for the virginal conception because he is superseded by God whose determining power he ministers in the sexual act, is therefore necessary for the procreation by which new human persons are created through the initiative of other men.

It is not a «distraction,» however, but the hard and central fact that so many children and young people have been abused because it is manifestly not the case that «bishops and priests are totally committed to the fullness of Catholic truth on matters of sexual morality.»

So though my ideal church would permit questioning, * real * questioning that leads to conversations, discussions and inquiry, rather than pat answers — include teachers of all sexes (female, male, intersex) and of all gender expressions and sexual orientations, it would by definition exclude a bunch of people.

People are tired, and a bit lonely — and because the great reality of our sexual differences is something they do know about, and suspect may be of greater significance than the dear ladies of DARC and WATCH and NADAWM and so on can fathom — they think that the truth of God is too remote and bleak and can never really be discovered.

Before we get to the trickiest sexual questions, based upon what many people are already doing, our book deals with marriage in the context of friendship, men's and women's roles and responsibilities and how to deal with sin so that marriage gets better rather than bitter.

This group is headed by radical extremist whose theories on sexual orientation are so bizarre that he actually believes Bozo the Clown can turn people gay.

How can you enjoy a full, satisfying sexual experience or deep emotional rapport with a person of the opposite sex when the differences are so vast?

While many people may agree that depictions of sexual violence in porn are harmful (half to two - thirds of respondents did so in polls last summer), whether all sexually explicit material is harmful is a matter of heated debate.

So when we turn those few texts that mention same gender sexual acts to hurt people we have become the Pharisees who use the law and tradition to make their own comfort at the expense of the very ones God's heart is turned towards.

In «Abortion in the Tides of Culture» (December 2002), Frederica Mathewes «Green considers mainstream society's increasingly intolerant attitude toward drunkenness and speculates that our society may analogously reject abortion and the other aspects of the sexual revolution eventually as well, not so much as a result of our preaching, but simply because people may eventually realize that the assumptions and lifestyle of the sexual revolution do not in fact lead to happiness.

Many of us can think of monks and nuns (as well as of others who are not vocationally celibate but nonetheless actually so) who have been enabled to live fully and healthily, rechanneling their sexual drive toward other modes of expression that can make them loving, concerned, caring, and deeply devoted and committed people.

God tells me to love everyone so their sexual preperence doesn't stop me from loving the PERSON.

People have asked if I wish I could have transitioned sooner, when it would not have taken as much work to reverse the secondary sexual characteristics, such as the three - hundred hours of electrolysis it took to remove my Latin American beard, so I could have enjoyed being Lisa longer.

Why on earth would two people harboring so much animosity towards each other contemplate a sexual encounter?

As a young person, I was so concerned about the «risk» of relationships turning sexual that I erred on the side of suppression and isolation (which leads to destructive explosions).

They don't want to appear emotionally attached to their sexual partner, so they have to act like they care less than the other person.

So... married people are «honest people» (clearly a dated and sexist phrase that had more to do with legitimizing a sexual relationship)?

Knowing all of this, I feel like finding another married man on the side who is also in a sexless marriage might be the best option for discrete and safe sexual exploration so that I can feel fullfilled as a person!

In many cases the partner denying sexual contact doesn't want to have sex with anyone, so what is it that defines this person as strong, being that they aren't fighting any physical need?

Breasts are seen as purely sexual by so many people these days, while their primary purpose for feeding babies is denigrated.