Biodiversity, yield, and
shade coffee certification.
Not exact matches
We are committed to protecting wildlife habitat and providing assistance to our
coffee farmers through our
shade grown
coffee certification.
The focus is on research on
coffee growing (e.g., how
shade impacts pests, yield, and biodiversity), as well as topics such as the economics of various
certifications.
I've spoken to a lot of consumers, and their overall impression is that RA
certification is an ecological one and they generally believe that it indicates that the
coffee is
shade grown.
For the most concise before - and - after comparison of the changes in the
shade requirements for Rainforest Alliance
certification, I provide below the criteria for
coffee from the 2005 SAN standard.
The Rainforest Alliance has a
certification program for
coffee that has an array of environmental standards, although
shade cultivation is not a requirement.
Many farms might, under the revised criteria, be able to cut back
shade (even if not due to contingencies like rust - epidemic), which may not help biological diversity or the ideas behind
shade - grown
coffee that sustainability
certification was meant to address.
Regarding
coffee certifications, Coffee & Conservation has been primarily concerned with criteria defining «shade» because those are the guidelines for canopy cover, vegetation structure, and tree species that promote biodiversity - friendly condi
coffee certifications,
Coffee & Conservation has been primarily concerned with criteria defining «shade» because those are the guidelines for canopy cover, vegetation structure, and tree species that promote biodiversity - friendly condi
Coffee & Conservation has been primarily concerned with criteria defining «
shade» because those are the guidelines for canopy cover, vegetation structure, and tree species that promote biodiversity - friendly conditions.
I recently reviewed a paper, Field - testing ecological and economic benefits of
coffee certification programs, that included a nifty summary table of the criteria used for
shade certification by Rainforest Alliance, and Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center (under the «Bird - Friendly» trademark).
The criterion will apply to all crops of SAN's
certification portfolio, not only to
coffee, cocoa or other crops not tolerant to
shade and therefore will increase SAN's positive impact on the more than 1.1 million certified farms in 42 countries.
The overall structure of the criterion means that «
shade monoculture» or even «sun
coffee» can receive Rainforest Alliance
certification.
Which brings me back to asking you about your personal thoughts about the
certification programs, especially those regarding
shade grown
coffee.
Rainforest Alliance certified
coffees have no organic requirement, and other «
shade grown» claims that lack a
certification are anybody's guess.
The paper is a straightforward look at the how different
shade coffee systems store carbon and their levels of greenhouse gas emissions, as well as how a few
certifications (organic, Rainforest Alliance, UTZ Certified) influence those metrics.
OCIA offers a separate
certification for organic /
shade coffee.
At least two organizations providing
coffee certification services have incorporated
shade criteria into their organic
certification standards.
Shade coffees are not labeled certified, although some do come from Smithsonian (SMBC) certified sources; unfortunately the fee to use the seal can sometimes be cost - prohibitive to a small roaster in the same way that the
certification fee can be unaffordable for farms and co-ops.
Considering that a number of Caribou offerings are from Africa and Asia, which are not eligible for
shade certification and which often are grown under
shade as a matter of course, this means that well over half of Caribou's
coffees will represent
shade coffees, in one shape or form.
After visiting some
coffee farms in Panama's western highlands, I have some thoughts regarding
shade certification programs.
The
certification gives growers access to gourmet market price premiums, and the timber and fruit trees on
shade coffee farms provide farmers with additional income.
For the most concise before - and - after comparison of the changes in the
shade requirements for Rainforest Alliance
certification, I provide below the criterion for
coffee from the 2005 SAN standard.
The standard for Rainforest Alliance
certification just underwent a major overhaul that more or less gutted the formerly decent
shade requirements for
coffee.
In fact, Fair Trade
certification has no criteria related to growing
coffee under
shade, it does not require organic
certification, it contains no guidelines for management of native or non-native species, it does not require any inventory of wildlife or prohibit hunting or trafficking in animals.
In my post, «Why certifying
shade coffee is so complex,» I ended with a comment regarding the upside - down nature of
shade (or organic)
certification.
The U.S. has two separate
shade certification systems intended to ensure that Latin American
shade - grown
coffee is produced under a set of scientific guidelines.