About 120 to 150 ha are in
shade coffee production, much of it organic; 87 ha is now certified Bird - Friendly.
Not exact matches
Goals included reforestation and creation of forest corridors to improve habitat, especially for migratory birds, and working with
coffee farmers to re-establish
shade trees and convert to organic
production.
A 40 %
shade tree level in many
coffee production areas is impossible to meet and can increase the incidence of fungus attacks or even lead to a lower farm income or financial losses.
The amount, composition, and structure of
shade cover is the main proxy for habitat preservation and the conservation of biodiversity, especially birds, in
coffee production areas.
Further, if the proposed criteria will permit the
shade / tree requirements to be outside the
production area as you mentioned, then there is less justification to reduce the amount of
shade required for
coffee in the standard.
And in the rush to increase
production, it caused a shift from traditional, sustainable
coffee growing methods (with
coffee plants grown in the
shade of diverse native trees) to intense monocultures that require large inputs of fertilizer and pesticides which bring about a loss in biodiversity and quickly deplete the land.
If low requirements for
shade production become mainstreamed and legitimized, and are seen as the true benchmarks for eco-friendly
coffee production, habitat quality and biodiversity will suffer.
In the early 1970s, almost all
coffee production in El Salvador was under
shade and most of it was organic.
Myers said the shift to technified
coffee production changed the process to look more like traditional large wheat or soybean farms in the United States as opposed to allowing
coffee plants to grow in smaller
shaded areas.
Spend the afternoon with a
coffee expert tasting and exploring elements that inspire
coffee production including earth, water, fauna, flora, sun, and
shade.