Sentences with phrase «shaky science»
The phrase "shaky science" refers to scientific studies or theories that may not be reliable or fully supported by evidence. It suggests that there could be doubts or flaws in the science behind something. Full definition
There is no justification for a war on outdoor cats — feral or otherwise — based on shaky science and an absence of ethical reasoning.
theconversation.com
Unfortunately, the tree - ring problems throw the rest of the already shaky science onto even worse ground.
His absorbing account details both the big business and the sometimes shaky science of sequencing: He follows fledgling biotech start - ups and the big fish gobbling them up, and he faults personal genomics companies for not considering environment and lifestyle in their clients» genetic assessments.
Shaky science fiction shacks up with a corny redemption tale in this Sundance Film Festival double award - winner.
Educators called on their members of Congress to implement research - based reforms and to avoid fad reforms that are backed by shaky science — or, in some cases, no science at all.
But unless we have clear data, evangelical antisalt campaigns are not just based on shaky science; they are ultimately unfair.
Nonsense on Stilts by Massimo Pigliucci (University of Chicago Press) A tour of solid science, shaky science, and pseudoscience, this crash course in critical thinking by biologist and philosopher Pigliucci includes handy rules for evaluating the confused public discourse on climate change, evolution, and even UFOs.
With great enthusiasm and shaky science, the demonization of dietary fat (a food that humans had been eating since, well, we became humans) started.
''... unless we have clear data, evangelical anti-salt campaigns are not just based on shaky science; they are ultimately unfair.
Dating platforms have always made their bones off of scientifically dubious claims of having the secret to matchmaking, but the concept of pheromones is some of the shakiest science out there.
In response, the American Petroleum Institute (API) coordinated a plan to spend millions of dollars to convince the public that the climate accord was based on shaky science.
Others, who did think it was possible to «win» a nuclear war, scoffed at the shaky science and strident polemics of nuclear apocalypse.
The word «uncontentious» in Revkin's article is a hyperlink to a 1998 NY Times article, alleging «Industry opponents of a treaty to fight global warming have drafted an ambitious proposal to spend millions of dollars to convince the public that the environmental accord is based on shaky science».