The companies say the pipeline would carry Bakken
shale oil more cheaply and safely from North Dakota to Illinois en route to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries than it could be shipped by railroad or tanker trucks.
Not exact matches
Then, higher
oil prices could also spur
more production from areas outside the hottest U.S.
shale play.
It is redesigning its deepwater
oil platforms and onshore
shale - gas projects to simplify them, a major cultural change at a firm that has long prided itself
more for engineering prowess than for economic discipline.
U.S.
shale producers have pioneered new techniques to drill
oil more efficiently but also in places that were once seen as impossible.
While Tillerson has ties to Russia, he partly missed a key energy development back home in the United States by ceding growth potential in the
shale oil industry to smaller,
more nimble rivals, including Continental Resources.
The so - called
shale revolution could help to alleviate Washington's reliance on foreign
oil, including from turbulent Middle Eastern states, while also supporting a bid to export to
more countries around the world.
Global
shale resources are vast enough to cover
more than a decade of
oil consumption, according to the first - ever U.S. assessment of reserves from Russia to Argentina.
Unlike traditional onshore oilfields, which might have an annual production decline of 5 % or less,
shale oil wells often decline
more than 50 % in their first year.
More bountiful still is
oil shale, a type of heavy
oil that lies between layers of rocks like North Dakota's
shale -
oil but requires oilsand - like extraction and upgrading techniques.
What's
more, any uptick in
oil prices will likely incentivize non-OPEC countries, for instance, U.S.
shale producers, to pump up supplies.
As they expire, small and medium sized
shale companies will be
more exposed to lower
oil prices.
What's
more, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) just reported that, thanks to the revitalized
shale revolution, the U.S. produced over 10 million barrels of
oil per day in November, the first time it's done so since 1970.
The only production that could be brought back on line fast is
shale oil, but without the extremely low interest rates caused by government meddling,
shale drilling will be much
more expensive in the future.
Of course, supply and demand will have to balance out over time, and
more Iranian crude will force a larger adjustment from U.S.
shale, so U.S.
oil production could see a deeper contraction.
Thanks to the so - called
shale revolution, the US has enough
oil that it's actually exporting
more than 3 million barrels a day of gasoline and diesel to the rest of the world.
After becoming CEO in 2006, Tillerson led Exxon through
more than a decade of ups and downs that included the late Hugo Chavez's seizure of Venezuelan
oil fields, annual profits that set U.S. corporate records, and a 2010
shale acquisition that turned into a $ 35 billion wrong - way bet on natural gas.
BP Plc is weighing an acquisition of some of BHP Billiton Ltd.'s energy assets as the British
oil major seeks
more U.S.
shale, according to people familiar with the matter.
The boom in unconventional fuels — such as bitumen extracted from Alberta's tar sands and
oil extracted from North Dakota's Bakken
shale formation by hydraulic fracturing («fracking»)-- has swelled global reserves even as climate scientists issue ever - sterner warnings that burning
more than a small fraction of these reserves would be suicidal.
As the
oil price increases, the
shale output will also increase with
more producers in the market.
One small group thinks that lower for longer could end soon because U.S.
shale can't keep a lid on prices forever and can't catch up with expected robust demand — all the
more so that investments in conventional supply around the world have slumped since the
oil prices started crashing.
Among commodities,
oil prices moved higher as fears about rising US
shale production abated somewhat, and market participants began giving
more weight to the effectiveness of supply cuts by members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and several other large
oil - producing countries.
Less than a year ago major
shale firms were saying they needed
oil above $ 60 a barrel to produce
more; now some say they will settle for far less in deciding whether to crank up output after the worst
oil price crash in a generation.
More recently, as
oil prices have struggled with the prospect of U.S.
shale production re-accelerating, inflation expectations have slid lower as well.
Oil production from US shale currently equates to less than 5 million barrels of oil per day out of total US production of slightly more than 9 million per d
Oil production from US
shale currently equates to less than 5 million barrels of
oil per day out of total US production of slightly more than 9 million per d
oil per day out of total US production of slightly
more than 9 million per day.
NEW ORLEANS U.S.
oil producer Devon Energy Corp said on Monday it was looking to sell even
more assets than previously announced in order to focus its portfolio on three
shale regions.
In other cases, the story is
more nuanced: For example,
oil and gas extraction firms benefit, while the producers of petroleum and coal products lose, echoing the tension between refiners and
oil -
shale producers.
With the US currently feeling
more or less self - sufficient with the
shale oil / gas boom of the last decade, the primary market for bitumen has dried up, and shipping it around the world is laughably uneconomical.
And that's where
shale producers can gain even
more traction over heavy
oil and offshore rivals, not to mention the Saudis.
I was concerned in several conversations, with me undertaking most of the listening, about the prospect of a sharp
oil price tag spike, if the Opec exporters» cartel, getting broken US
shale producers by dragging prices down, starts off limiting source as soon as much
more.
shale oil may be a bubble but countries like Libya Iraq Iran produce nothing compared to their potential / production capacity + there is always offshore exploration recently Morocco seems to be in the spot light not to mention the arctic sea / north pole especially Russia where a new Koweit is to be found and also south China sea Venezuela's tight
oil if all the types of
oil are included venezuela must be a heaven with a quarter of global
oil reserves with +300 billion barrels
more than 260 bbls of Saudi Arabia that can still produce
more than 10/11 million barrel / day that it's procucing today.
Lou Mercer: Yeah, so I think that's a key point, is that there are some other factors in play here, and that is that not only is
oil shale production up, but the technology is getting
more and
more affordable, as it often does.
Bitumen production is way
more expensive than
oil from
shale.
However, the fact that the average quantity of frack sand used per well has
more than doubled in recent years — which has helped lower the breakeven price of U.S.
shale oil — should help insulate the industry from the worst of the
oil crash.
However, gold may be the
more attractive bet over the long term as geopolitical risks and rising U.S.
shale production squeeze
oil prices.
«Assuming that technology will allow ever
more shale gas production at low prices — and betting energy policy and the future energy security of the country on it — is risky business,» says geologist David Hughes, who retired from the Canadian Geological Survey and is now doing assessments of
shale gas and
oil for the nonprofit Post Carbon Institute, a California - based environmental think tank.
Whether such a quantity can be produced from tar sands and
oil shale at a price near (never mind below) $ 30 per barrel is highly uncertain, but
more suggestive of Lomborgs confusion in any case is that the price he mentions is higher (according to his own Figure 65) than the price of
oil has been for any prolonged period in the last 120 years except for 1979 - 86, in the aftermath of the second (1979) Arab - OPEC
oil - price shock.3 This means resources of tar sands and
oil shale that would be economically exploitable only at prices around $ 30 per barrel are in fact
more expensive than
oil has been for nearly all of the last century.
Hydraulic fracturing, a technique for extracting
oil and gas from
shale rock, often takes place a mile or
more below groundwater supplies.
Fracking (hydraulic fracturing) rock fracturing with pressurized liquid creating cracks in deep - rock formations through which
shale gas,
oil, tight gas and brine will flow
more freely... major part of the Golden Age of Gas
Moreover, I think you are failing to take into account that while
Oil is running out, we have more than enough coal, oil shale, tar sands, etc. to continue to cook our goo
Oil is running out, we have
more than enough coal,
oil shale, tar sands, etc. to continue to cook our goo
oil shale, tar sands, etc. to continue to cook our goose.
If this happens, a combination of even
more subsidies to the
oil companies and technological breakthroughs could easily enable both tar sands and
shale oil - and then we may be really in trouble.
Landscapes will continue to suffer as we move to
more tar sands,
oil shales, etc..
Gasoline from traditional sources, including these harebrained schemes to go offshore and onto ANWR, is inseparable from tar sands and
oil shale, which are far
more abundant and destructive (as Raypierre pointed out).
Then there's well over a TRILLION barrels of recoverable
shale oil,
more than the world has used in all of history.
It's an initial sign that the
oil and gas industry is waking up to the need for far
more transparency if
shale gas is to play a substantial role in America's energy mix any time soon.
In case you missed it, the
oil was being carried from America's new
oil patch, the Bakken
shale fields of North Dakota, to a St. John, New Brunswick, refinery that, according to the owner, Irving Energy, sends
more than half of its 300,000 daily barrels of petroleum products back across the border to the northeastern United States.
With
shale oil and
more coal than anybody else that can be turned in to
oil, it is not a matter of survival if we have the will to use what we already have.
A
more likely scenario if we do nothing is that emissions will continue at a rapid pace as
oil from sand and
shale plus coal substantially replace
oil and natural gas, with the consequence that we will have dug ourselves into a deeper hole in terms of having sufficient resources to reduce emissions sufficiently without major disruption to our society.
Those guys go around saying the
oil just isn't there (and if you blather about biodisel or
shale, they will tell you that it takes
more energy to get that stuff than you get out of it.)
Despite our talk, the reality is that we and others are searching everywhere for
more oil — from new
oil fields, tar sands,
oil shales, or anywhere else they may be hiding.
We might not then need the tar sands and
oil shales, and this would be a better overall solution because we would be able to reduce emissions and re-stabilize the climate
more quickly, and thus avoid the need for some of the
more extreme adaptation measures.