Sentences with phrase «share holder»

Only one I can think of off the top of my head is that the owner and share holder have to agree at the time what the home is worth to determine the price of a share.

Individual members will not legally be entitled to any profits realtor.ca makes because you are not a legal share holder?

Increase share holder value by returning savings to workable capital and increasing cost avoidance.

If proper preparation is not made to preserve it in the event of the death of a partner or a share holder of a closely held corporation everything can fall apart.

Ever since its establishment nearly 6 decades ago, the LIC has been a huge market share holder in the insurance industry.

Osama Bin Laden's family has become the primary share holder in Marni Carrara, the company that quarries the famous Italian stone, used in some of the country's most famous Roman and Renaissance works of art.

EY, a share holder of EI, is code sharing with them on this route.

River Hollow Partners joins Kriser's existing share holder Alliance Consumer Growth.

It has already sold nearly a quarter of its holdings, most of which went to a new share holder, M.R.Y. Oil Co..

Clearly they will have will have to be more share holder friendly.

If may be worth mentioning that in this day and age it is considered preferable and more share holder friendly for a company to raise money for acquisitions and investment through borrowing.

Very happy WPC share holder.

Hi Wex in dec 2012 you wrote a letter for the ARGO management suggesting different share holder friendly activities, of which one was a share buy back.

I am a small share holder & do nt really understand what happened?

and if not how do you explain such high share holder returns for tobacco companies such as MO and PM over the last ~ 50 years?

I have been filing 1040ez for the last couple of years, but I recently discovered I owned property through a dissolved corporation (Florida, C Corp) in which I was the sole share holder.

An example of what you can do is invest your $ 5000.00 per year into a real estate investment corporation and become the main share holder.

Even Vanguard, known for low fees and equitable share holder treatment, provides even lower fees to its larger investors, via so - called Admiral Shares, and institutional customers.

That means each share holder now owns 1 / 200th of the company.

And I'm curious if I understood something correctly when a business has zero revenue, but still pays the sole share holder a salary...

After four years of operating under the name of Banknorth, Toronto Dominion Bank came into play as the majority share holder.

Actually, share holder value is is better maximised by borrowing, and paying dividends is fairly irrelevant but a natural phase on a mature and stable company.

Change has to come from the top, if the majority share holder doesn't care about results on the field, that filters down through the whole club.

Gazidis took over from Dein, Dein was the guy who done the transfers when Wenger first arrived and Dein was a share holder, more power in transfers.

We have another major share holder who the bourd say he's not our kind of person?

Initially it was David Dein, the guy was also a share holder and had a lot of say with the board on who we could and could not get.

The board sounded very admirable when they said they wanted to do it all themselves and that they didn't want a foreign majority share holder taking control of the club... They felt so strong about this that they made a pact not to sell.

Wenger started and he had support, with support from Dein (who was on the board and share holder as well as friend to Wenger) Wenger won triophies... without Deins support he has been relyed upon for doing the boards job as well as they're a bunch of clueless w * nkers who are only interested in profit for there boss Silent Stan so he can then take funds from us as «stratigic BS» which he has not done to his American teams from what I can tell.

David Dein was a share holder, he was on the board and he was the one who got transfers and wages sorted.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was the main share holder, And Laurel and Hardy are his rich buddies Covering for him.?

I know that Piers Morgan is a bit of a muppet, But at the end of the day, he is a share holder at Arsenal fc and he will hear more things involving the club than we will.

Oh the old board got greedy as soon as they seen how much they could get, promising to not sell to a majority foreign share holder and making that pact which yeah... remind the world how true that was.

Are AFC owned by a majority share holder who is foreign?

Perfect balanced team, A manager who is driven to win no matter what, Main share holder who wants success and not money, World stars wherever the eyes can see.

Dein knew we needed investment and that is why Dein got Usmanov interested, he wanted to keep winning but the rest of the board disagreed about how we would have a sole majority share holder.

they might be a b000ard club, but the main share holder cares for the club, and does everything to make everything right, even sacking his most succesfull manager in morinhio.

Under his rival and current majority share holder Stan Kroenke, Arsenal have seen their «business» turn more towards saving money and making big bucks for the American, rather than investing the same money into players that will help the team win trophies.

Assuming Arsenal fans gather a massive protest in UK specifically LONDON, against the majority share holder Satan K. And in favor of Usmanov, do you think it will make any effect?????? Just a taught.

I recall before he joined and we had Dein as a share holder and working on the board, look how he managed to make transfers happen and he was dealing with wages (Cashley admits in his book).

Arsenal has not won the title since Mr Kroenke became major share holder in 2009 which does not concern him one iota or should that be one idiotota In fact Mr Kroenke is on record as saying he did not buy a sports team to win trophies.

We can't even get rid of Wenger an employee of the club n you are proposing we get rid of d major share holder of the club Delusional, between Wenger and Stan who would be easier to get rid of?

Yes the share holder coach the club has as done a lot for the club in 20 years, then we should take a statistics and see how many Champions League, EPL, FA Cup, Carling Cups He has won in those 20 years.

Back then David Dein was on the board and he is a passionate Arsenal fan, a share holder who was a fan... Those was nice years.

New back room staff needed second biggest share holder should be aloud to have a say and spend his money but in there words he's not our kind of person.

It's so unfortunate that we have a mediocre board of directors, coach oh I beg your pardon share holder who only think of their pockets and not the interest of the club.

I'm a true gunner, I have been to see them live and never miss a match, use to spend hundreds a year on them until I found out more about Silent Stan and how all his sports teams are cash cows... I have researched our majority share holder, I have paid attention to the appointment of Gazidis and the role he was to then take over.

The yank needs to go and our 2nd major share holder to put his Money in to the club like he wants to do but Arsenal bourd have said publicly that he's not our kind of person??? Wtf is that all about

So please re-evaluate your own thoughts about Wenger being the fault, this was never the case up until Gazidis came to AFC, Wengers FRIEND Dein wanted investment into the club and was a share holder, he sold his shares to try and get that investment to the club... Wenger has said that he and Dein are close friends, you think close friends wouldn't of discussed something as big as Usmanov coming into the club?

This time though the board I belive got greedy and thats why they made a pact to not sell any more shares and made claims that we would not be in the situation where we have a share holder with the majority.

I have supported (watched / season ticket holder plus a share holder back in the 70's) the team since 1958 when I was 6 — I lived within walking distance of the old ground — I have given up I do not care any more — I will not watch them on Tv or go to a game.