Sentences with phrase «share parental responsibility for your children»

In 2014, parenting orders were made, which ordered equal shared parental responsibility for the children and authorized either parent to take the children on an overseas holiday subject to certain conditions being met.

The person named in a Child Arrangements Order shares parental responsibility for the child with the parents, and can make most important decisions on behalf of the child without needing the permission of the parents.

(4) The presumption may be rebutted by evidence that satisfies the court that it would not be in the best interests of the child for the child's parents to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child.

(a) a parenting order provides (or is to provide) that a child's parents are to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child; and

(i) if they are to share parental responsibility for the child under the plan — provisions of the kind referred to in paragraph 63C (2)(d)(which deals with the form of consultations between the parties to the plan) as a way of avoiding future conflicts over, or misunderstandings about, the matters covered by that paragraph; and

(1) If a parenting order provides (or is to provide) that a child's parents are to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child, the court must:

Unless a court orders otherwise, you will continue to share parental responsibility for your children, even if you are not in a relationship with their other parent.

When the parents of a child under the age of 18 separate, they both continue to share parental responsibility for the child.

The Special Guardian then shares parental responsibility for the child with the parents, and can make nearly all the major decisions about the child without having to consult them.

(1) Subject to subsection (6), if a parenting order provides (or is to provide) that a child's parents are to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child, the court must:

If any of these orders are made, Children's Services share parental responsibility for the child with the parents.

Under this order, Children's Services share parental responsibility for the child with the parents.

When there is a care order, Children's Services share parental responsibility for the child with the parents.

In these circumstances, the Children's Services Department named in the order shares parental responsibility for the child with their parents.

Not exact matches

However, Morneau, who also announced the introduction of up to five weeks of parental leave for fathers or non-birth parents to encourage greater sharing of child - rearing responsibilities, did not address a question on the limits of legislation and what the government can do to address societal barriers that could contribute the gender pay gap.

Another important factor that can help schools promote parental involvement and sharing responsibility for the performance of their children are trusting relationships between teachers and parents.

As a component of the school - level parental involvement policy mandated by federal law Title I, each school served under this part shall jointly develop with parents for all children served under this part a school - parent compact that outlines how parents, the entire school staff, and students will share the responsibility for improved student achievement and the means by which the school and parents will build and develop a partnership to help children achieve the State's high standards.

In most cases, parental responsibility for a minor child will be shared by both parents so that each retains full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child.

For example, the court looks at the history of the relationship between the children and each parent, the moral fitness of each parent, mental and physical health of each parent, the division of parental responsibilities after the divorce, the ability for each parent to provide a routine for the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the othFor example, the court looks at the history of the relationship between the children and each parent, the moral fitness of each parent, mental and physical health of each parent, the division of parental responsibilities after the divorce, the ability for each parent to provide a routine for the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the othfor each parent to provide a routine for the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the othfor the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the other.

For purposes of establishing or modifying parental responsibility and creating, developing, approving, or modifying a parenting plan, including a time - sharing schedule, which governs each parent's relationship with his or her minor child and the relationship between each parent with regard to his or her minor child, the best interest of the child shall be the primary consideration.

Although the local authority might have the statutory power under s. 33 (3)(b) to prevent M from calling the twins «Preacher» and «Cyanide», there was a small category of cases where, notwithstanding the local authority's powers under s. 33 (3)(b), the consequences of the exercise of a particular act of parental responsibility were so profound and had such an impact on either the child his or herself, and / or the Art. 8 rights of those other parties who shared parental responsibility with a local authority, that the matter must come before the court for its consideration and determination.

Although no federal laws specifically address custody, parental responsibility, visitation or time - sharing issues in military divorces, these issues are often made more challenging because service members» obligations to their jobs require extra flexibility and creativity in creating parenting plans and time - sharing arrangements that will work for both parents as well as serve the best interests of the children.

The court may award joint custody, where the parents share decision - making for the children, or sole custody, one parent having control over and parental responsibility for the care, upbringing and education of the child.

If a child is Gillick competent and wishes to receive treatment, their consent alone is sufficient authority without the need to obtain parental consent; although those with parental responsibility for the child should generally be consulted (subject to any valid refusal of consent to share information).

An unmarried step - parent who wishes to acquire parental responsibility for their step - child would have to apply for a residence order (or shared residence order) or to adopt their step - child.

I. New proposed parental leave (EI) benefit As anticipated, the budget introduced a new «Use it or Lose it» Employment Insurance (EI) Parental Sharing Benefit for new dads (or the second parent) to take parental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their younparental leave (EI) benefit As anticipated, the budget introduced a new «Use it or Lose it» Employment Insurance (EI) Parental Sharing Benefit for new dads (or the second parent) to take parental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their younParental Sharing Benefit for new dads (or the second parent) to take parental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their younparental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their young child.

Florida judges presume that joint legal custody, called shared parental responsibility, is best for every child.

Under child custody laws in New Hampshire, joint legal custody, wherein both parents share joint responsibility for all parental rights and decisions, is deemed beneficial for the child.

(6) In any proceeding under this section, the court may not deny shared parental responsibility and time - sharing rights to a parent solely because that parent is or is believed to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus, but the court may, in an order approving the parenting plan, require that parent to observe measures approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States Public Health Service or by the Department of Health for preventing the spread of human immunodeficiency virus to the child.

The court shall order that the parental responsibility for a minor child be shared by both parents unless the court finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child.

If the court determines that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental responsibility and make such arrangements for time - sharing as specified in the parenting plan as will best protect the child or abused spouse from further harm.

Yet, under the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act, judicial orders for these couples must apply a presumption that «equal shared parental responsibility» is in the best interests of Parental Responsibility) Act, judicial orders for these couples must apply a presumption that «equal shared parental responsibility» is in the best interesResponsibility) Act, judicial orders for these couples must apply a presumption that «equal shared parental responsibility» is in the best interests of parental responsibility» is in the best interesresponsibility» is in the best interests of a child.

FAMILY LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissed.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — with whom the child lives — where there are allegations the father and paternal grandmother sexually abused the child — whether there is an unacceptable risk of harm to the child in the father's care — where the child has speech and language delays — where the child had spent unsupervised time with the father after separation — where the parties entered into final Consent Orders in October 2015 — where the allegations arose after that — where the child has been spending supervised time with the father since October 2016 — where the mother obtained a domestic violence protection order against the father in 2015 — where an order for equal shared parental responsibility is not in the child's best interests — where an unacceptable risk of harm is not found — where the mother is granted sole parental responsibility — where the child will continue to live primarily with the mother and spend unsupervised time with the father on an increasing basis

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thCHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mother

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.

When Ahmed finds out more about family law, he realises that both he and Aisha have parental responsibility, and may continue to share the responsibility of caring for their children.

Sole Parental Responsibility - a parenting arrangement under which the responsibility for the minor child (ren) is given to one parent by the court, with or without rights of time - sharing to theResponsibility - a parenting arrangement under which the responsibility for the minor child (ren) is given to one parent by the court, with or without rights of time - sharing to theresponsibility for the minor child (ren) is given to one parent by the court, with or without rights of time - sharing to the other parent.

It is the law that, except in certain rare circumstances, both parents will share parental responsibility for all minor children involved in this case.

The parenting plan will outline, among other things, parental responsibility (the authority to for a parent to make decisions regarding a child's welfare) and a time - sharing (visitation) schedule.

For example, Prof. Kruk has written: «Child Custody, Access and Parental Responsibility: The Search for a Just and Equitable Standard» where he persuasively and cogently lays out the arguments for equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic cFor example, Prof. Kruk has written: «Child Custody, Access and Parental Responsibility: The Search for a Just and Equitable Standard» where he persuasively and cogently lays out the arguments for equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic cfor a Just and Equitable Standard» where he persuasively and cogently lays out the arguments for equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic cfor equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic can.

The plan should detail such things as the time - sharing schedule, including holidays, vacations and special occasions, transportation routine, communication between children and parents, how decisions will be made and disagreements handled, and parental responsibility for healthcare, daily tasks, extracurricular activities and school functions.

It is the law, except in certain rare circumstance, that both parents will share parental responsibility for all minor children involved in this case.

(1) If a supplemental petition or a motion for modification of time - sharing and parental responsibility is filed because a parent is activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service and the parent's ability to comply with time - sharing is materially affected as a result, the court may not issue an order or modify or amend a previous judgment or order that changes time - sharing as it existed on the date the parent was activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service, except that a court may enter a temporary order to modify or amend time - sharing if there is clear and convincing evidence that the temporary modification or amendment is in the best interests of the child.

The trial court... found that it was in the best interest of the child for the parties to be awarded shared parental responsibility with the Father as the primary residential parent.

«The trial court in Wade concluded that there were substantial and material changes in circumstances, and its findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, including: evidence of parental alienation of the Father by the Mother; failure of the Mother to cooperate with the parenting coordinator and comply with the parenting agreement; violation of shared parental responsibility as evidenced by the Mother's unilateral change of the child's elementary school and her unilateral change of the child's therapist; and the finding that the Mother was in contempt of court for her actions relative to visitation.

Mediation, without question, is the more respectful, amicable and cost - effective way to dissolve a relationship, and the best for the emotional welfare of children when there will be shared parental responsibility following the divorce.

There is consensus that «shared parenting» be defined as encompassing both shared parental authority (decision - making) and shared parental responsibility for the day - to - day upbringing and welfare of children, between fathers and mothers, in keeping with children's age and stage of development.

«Shared parenting — being defined as encompassing both shared parental authority and shared parental responsibility with a minimum of one - third time with each parent, including weekday time — is a viable post-divorce parenting arrangement for the majority of children of divorce, and in their best interests.

As shared parenting encompasses both shared parental authority (decision - making) and shared parental responsibility for the day - to - day upbringing and welfare of children, between fathers and mothers, in keeping with children's age and stage of development, there is consensus that legal implementation of shared parenting, including both the assumption of shared responsibilities and presumption of shared rights in regard to the parenting of children by fathers and mothers who are living together or apart, be enshrined in law.