Sentences with phrase «share structure in»

Corporate assets can also be used for income splitting purposes as well, Tom, but if you don't already have the proper share structure in place, you may need to incur several thousand dollars in legal fees to restructure your holding company.
Stronach cut a deal to transform MID into a pure real estate play with a single share structure in return for its remaining gaming assets, worth between US$ 585 million and US$ 730 million.

Not exact matches

In his book Synchronicity, Joe Jaworski explores the positive outcomes of openly sharing structured goals and visions — people begin to understand your aspirations and priorities and how they can contribute to your success.
In November 2009, Facebook's board of directors voted to establish a dual - class stock structure, moving the existing shareholders stock from Class A to Class B shares, which carry 10 times the voting power.
Pincus said in an interview with CNBC that he and the board «talked, questioned, when would it make sense to move from multi-class to single - class share structure
«We believe it critical for a listing exchange to ensure a high - quality displayed quote to reduce the cost of capital and share price volatility for its issuers, and in the absence of broader market structure reform, exchange - paid quoting incentives are a necessary mechanism in a highly fragmented US marketplace to support liquidity for listed companies,» Cunningham said in a letter to clients emailed to Business Insider.
The share of companies in the S&P 500 with a split structure has risen to 41 percent in 2011 (the most recent figures available) from 23 percent in 2003, according to a report by Deloitte last year.
Now, Greenlight Capital is proposing a dual share class structure they say will unlock between $ 13 billion and $ 38 billion in shareholder value.
He emphasizes that family - controlled companies should have policies in place to allow for the unravelling of preferential share structures.
Says Wong, «The earlier challenges were sort of partner buy - in and getting our name out there and things like bonus structures for our sales team, structuring our revenue share model and putting together all the default paperwork for how we would build out our streams of relationships, so to speak.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Generally, Camilo says, working with celebrities involves revenue share agreements, and each deal is structured differently «in terms of advances or minimum guarantees.»
Note: A Structure Capital spokesperson declined to share the number publicly, clarifying that each partner gives out their number to portfolio company founders who can then share it with colleagues or others in the industry.
At a recent Stanford Medicine X lecture, Stanford Graduate School of Business organizational behavior professor Lindred Greer described three problems with top - down team structures — whether in a hospital setting or an office — and shared tips on how to make better decisions as a group.
Twitter shares have been under severe pressure of late, down more than 40 percent in the last six months as uncertainty over the company's leadership structure and growth potential weighed on investors.
«KKR's conversion from a partnership to a corporation is designed to broaden our investor base, simplify our structure and make it easier to invest in our shares,» Henry R. Kravis and George R. Roberts, co-chairmen and co-CEOs of KKR, said in a statement.
Seedrs checks the background of directors, the claims made in their campaigns, including the ownership of intellectual property, and that shares are of equal worth rather than a dual structure.
As Congress considers or creates new structures to allow information sharing regarding cybersecurity and other matters among law enforcement agencies and regulators, we strongly urge the inclusion of state securities, insurance, and banking regulators in those discussions and in any new framework.
The wholesale colocation data center market share of San Francisco - based Digital Realty Trust, the biggest company in that market, is about equal to the combined market share of the rest of the top - five providers in the category, according to data shared exclusively with Data Center Knowledge by Structure Research.
Hong Kong is eyeing several tech listings in the coming two years, including those with dual - class share structure, from Chinese firms with a combined market cap of $ 500 billion.
In Hong Kong, the dual - class share structure is available only for individuals.
This share structure will allow the company to benefit from Mr. Lei's «vision and leadership» while allowing him to maintain its «long - term prospects and strategy,» Xiaomi said in its filing.
Mutual Fund Share - mutual fund share classes are mutual funds that are identical in product, but a have a defense in fee structure, designated by alphabetic symbol after the funds name... A class A, has a front end load (a fee at the time of the purchase of the fund), a class B share has a back end Share - mutual fund share classes are mutual funds that are identical in product, but a have a defense in fee structure, designated by alphabetic symbol after the funds name... A class A, has a front end load (a fee at the time of the purchase of the fund), a class B share has a back end share classes are mutual funds that are identical in product, but a have a defense in fee structure, designated by alphabetic symbol after the funds name... A class A, has a front end load (a fee at the time of the purchase of the fund), a class B share has a back end share has a back end load.
While the company undertook some reforms — for one, scrapping its dual - chief - executive structure in November — the conversations yielded little effect on the company's dwindling share price.
In effect, the non-voting shares are similar to the dual - class share structures that are more common among tech IPOs.
We understand shareholder interest in the structure of our annual cash incentive plan and the long - term performance share component of our stock incentive plan.
Since the company went public in 2008, it's raised its dividend each year and its share price has outperformed gold bullion and gold miners, as measured by the S&P / TSX Global Gold Index, due to its unique structure and debt - free model.
The study analyzed data from employees in seven different office environments, including: «single - room office; shared - room office (2 - 3 workers in the room); small, open - plan office (4 - 9 workers); medium - sized, open - plan office (10 - 24 workers); large, open - plan office (more than 24 workers); flex - office (no individual workspaces); and combi - office (less than 20 percent of the workforce is not at individual workstations, team - based work structure).»
In order to have a greater impact, SBP is working to share its model with other organizations, thereby raising rebuilding capacity across the state, and is advising state leadership on how to structure a prompt, efficient and predictable recovery.
Separate SPVs for each investor work well for transactions with few investors, while the Share Class structure is best when multiple investors participate in a single Mainstream SPV.
Notwithstanding the basic need to trust one another, founders should understand very clearly what it will take to change the shareholders» agreement and the share capital structure in the future.
It can be argued that mega-mutual fund advisors have been drawn into an alliance with the shareholder empowerment movement on the issues of proxy access and dual class share structures created through IPOs like Snap Inc.'s, which resulted in a class of non-voting shares, simply because of the business opportunity such an alliance represents.
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Ferrari, in which Exor has large stakes, both have versions of loyalty structures, under which investors who hold shares for a certain period and register them receive additional special shares giving them additional voting rights.
One of the governance principles is that «Shareholders should be entitled to voting rights in proportion to their economic interest...» In other words, the Group does not favour multi-voting share structures that characterize over 80 companies on the TSX and that have been popular in Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO herein proportion to their economic interest...» In other words, the Group does not favour multi-voting share structures that characterize over 80 companies on the TSX and that have been popular in Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO hereIn other words, the Group does not favour multi-voting share structures that characterize over 80 companies on the TSX and that have been popular in Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO herein Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO here).
But it also creates a dual class share structure, which has given rise to a broader debate about legal protections for outside shareholders and the role that securities regulators should play in Canadian capital markets.
The fund's UIT structure is shared by a few other long - lived ETFs (like SPY), with the most notable effects being a slight cash drag since stock dividends received in between the ETF's distributions can't be reinvested as is typically the case.
«KKR's conversion from a partnership to a corporation is designed to broaden our investor base, simplify our structure and make it easier to invest in our shares,» the two co-CEOs said.
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.
The first is a familiar one: A shareholder group asked Alphabet to scrap its dual - voting structure, proposed four years ago, that clumps most voting power in Class B shares, which are primarily owned by Google co-founders and Alphabet chiefs Larry Page and Sergey Brin.
We know that expenses are important to investors; therefore, in 2016, Harris Associates expanded the Oakmark Funds» share class structures.
Khamovniki District had an 11 % share in September 2016, down from 16 % in the previous three months due to changes in supply structure.
Those talks ended, however, for the same reason Bombardier always has trouble raising private capital — the company's dual class share structure, which cements control firmly in the hands of descendants of company founder Joseph - Armand Bombardier.
Since then, however, Ratner has lost standing with the parent company, long controlled by family members, which in late 2016 announced it was dismantling its two - class share structure and that he would leave the board.
Obviously past performance of these companies does not mean they will continue to outperform in the future and the analysis does not mean that investors should only hold equities with a dual - class share structure.
In a recent blog posting, Dr Richard Leblanc, Associate Professor in Law, Governance & Ethics at Toronto's York University said that Telus» plans to collapse its dual - share structure brought up «red flags»In a recent blog posting, Dr Richard Leblanc, Associate Professor in Law, Governance & Ethics at Toronto's York University said that Telus» plans to collapse its dual - share structure brought up «red flags»in Law, Governance & Ethics at Toronto's York University said that Telus» plans to collapse its dual - share structure brought up «red flags».
The final argument in favour of a dual - class structure that we feel is worth mentioning will resonate more with a retail investor and it is simply that investors don't vote their shares in an «active» manner.
A dual - class share structure essentially renders the voice of «the people» worthless but with many investors not having a particular insight or inside knowledge of a business and management having a lot of skin in the game, this might not be such a bad thing.
Unfortunately, as long as a dual - class share structure is in place, not much can be done to replace the management team.
It was in those first few months that Medibank shares benefited from the structure of the government sale.
Likewise, the NDP called for a higher minimum wage and a tax structure that shares the cost of running a province fairly, both items that are expected to be in today's throne speech too.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z