Sentences with phrase «share tax system»

CVH has chapters in NYC, Yonkers, Newburgh and Poughkeepsie and organizes around a truly affordable housing, a just social safety net, good jobs and access to them, a participatory democracy, and a fair share tax system to fund critical programs for low - income families.

Not exact matches

Another curiosity of the accounting system: when companies issue shares to employees exercising their options, the company can take a tax deduction as compensation expense.

Budgetary revenues as a share of GDP are projected to decline from 14.8 per cent in 2015 - 16 to 14.4 per cent in 2025 - 26, as higher personal income taxes, resulting from the progressivity of the tax system, are more than offset by stability or declines in the other taxes.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the Company; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; disruptions in information technology networks and systems; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's dividend payments on its Series A Preferred Stock; tax law changes or interpretations; pricing actions; and other factors.

Examples of forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make regarding the Company's plans, assumptions, expectations, beliefs and objectives with respect to store openings and closings; product introductions; sales; sales growth; sales trends; store traffic; retail prices; gross margin; operating margin; expenses; interest and other expenses, net; effective income tax rate; net earnings and net earnings per share; share count; inventories; capital expenditures; cash flow; liquidity; currency translation; growth opportunities; litigation outcomes and recovery related thereto; the collectability of amounts due under financing arrangements with diamond mining and exploration companies; and certain ongoing or planned product, marketing, retail, manufacturing, information systems development, upgrades and replacement, and other operational and strategic initiatives.

In 1966 the 6 - volume report declared that fairness should be the foremost objective of the taxation system; the existing system was not only too complicated and inefficient, but under it the poor paid more than their fair share while the wealthy avoided taxes through various loopholes.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the business and operations of the Company in the expected time frame; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; tax law changes or interpretations; and other factors.

The wealthy, paying more taxes, would nevertheless share in the benefits of an efficient taxation system.

These results mean that the GOP's individual income tax cuts made the income tax system more «progressive,» with higher earners paying a larger share of the overall burden.

With Obama's historic victory in November, I began to dream of a new order — of acres of new wind turbines silently generating clean energy, of sleek bullet trains seamlessly linking our great metropolises, and of a modernized tax system under which the rich would finally pay their fair share.

The justice that comes through enforced sharing (found in the tax and benefit systems of welfare states) is higher - since it reflects a consensus of social solidarity - but still not enough.

Demand that their political leaders enact a no - nonsense, no - loophole income tax system which insures that all pay their fair share.

The park system operates on revenue received from the district's share of real estate property taxes, user fees and grants.

These conditions persist because the tax system of most developed countries was set up in an era when «hot assets» were a fairly marginal share of the economy and most assets could be easily associated with a physical location.

All that campaign cash has helped buy a state and local tax system that's regressive — where the wealthy actually pay less than the poor and middle class, and nowhere near their fair share

At the Oct. 19 Delegate Assembly, the first since the summer break, UFT President Michael Mulgrew reported on principals abusing the teacher evaluation system, the dysfunctional Special Education Student Information System and the need to make the state's richest pay their fair share of system, the dysfunctional Special Education Student Information System and the need to make the state's richest pay their fair share of System and the need to make the state's richest pay their fair share of taxes.

The Hedge Clippers analysis argues that the massive sums from the hedge fund industry have helped create a system where wealthy individuals pay «nowhere near their fair share» due to tax policies that favor the rich, including a low tax bracket on upper - income earners and on «carried interest» profits, as well as the recent elimination of the «alternative minimum tax.»

Comparisons have to proceed from the (nominal or effective) tax rates for a given bracket / income, the fact that a given share of revenue comes from the richest doesn't make a system progressive.

The real problem, in Magee's eyes, is that wealthy New Yorkers are trying to dismantle the publicly funded school system — complete with the powerful teachers unions — because they don't want to pay their «fair share» in taxes to support the education of all children, not just the «elite.»

The next parliament could see cherished progressive liberal aspirations realised: a proportional electoral system; wider and better - defended civil liberties; a new, internationalist approach to foreign affairs and immigration; reform of the tax system to share wealth and curb carbon emissions; and an assault on the vested interests of the financial sector.

This, of course, should concern all New Yorkers; the lion's share of the tax money coming from these facilities has been designated for the state's education system.

But he said that the system is «still rigged» and said that the day will come when health care is a right for all Americans, the wealthy 1 percent pay their fair share in taxes and college everywhere «is actually debt - free.»

HARTFORD — State lawmakers arriving for the start of the 2016 legislative session Wednesday have just 13 weeks to deal with a slew of complex proposals, from regulating and taxing home - sharing services such as Airbnb to establishing a system of paid leave for new parents to dealing with opiate...

«Cities that are considering the implementation or expansion of bicycle share systems must keep in mind that although they require a major investment at the beginning, the combined benefits from such systems, including an increase in property taxes, might well outweigh the initial costs.»

Kentucky must equalize spending among school districts, revise its tax system, and significantly boost its share of school revenues if it is to fulfill its obligation to children under the state constitution, an advisory committee appointed by a state trial judge has concluded.

We have a tax system that does not ask those who have the most wealth and resources to pay their fair share — even with passage of Prop 30, wealth and income have been massively redistributed in California and the nation over the past three decades in the wrong direction.

1973 — A complete tax base equalization program is enacted that provides a much higher appropriation of equalization aid to relieve local property taxes; discontinues general flat aids; institutes a power equalizing program providing for «negative aids»; and separates the shared cost into primary and secondary levels with a two - level system of state aid in which school costs which exceed the statutory ceiling of aidable costs are supported at a lower level of state aid to serve as a disincentive to high levels of spending.

One key difference, however, is that the Barefoot - Hise proposal would order traditional school systems to share myriad funds currently not accessible to charters, including gifts, sales tax dollars and federal grants and reimbursements, at least one pool of which is used to offset the costs of school lunch programs, even though many charters do not participate in such programs.

As I have stated before, it is time for all Indiana public school systems to stand up and share with local taxpayers the real value of where their tax dollars should be going, and that is into INDIANA PUBLIC SCHOOLS!

Among its provisions, Tillman's rewrite would require public school systems to share more pots of money with local charters, including sales tax revenues, gifts and grants and funds received for «indirect» costs.

High - income taxpayers may garner a large share of an income tax cut, but the tax system could still end up more progressive if their share of the tax cut is much smaller than their share of overall tax liabilities.

A more accountable system would see a huge penalty for not paying your share — the tax should be $ 10,000 per person or more.

Filed Under: Taxes Tagged With: Current Tax System, Fair Share, Government, Income Tax, Tax Dollars, Tax System, Value Added Tax Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, or other advertiser and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Using either system, you may end up with a lower tax liability from the sale of your shares than the IRS would assume using the first - in, first - out rule.

Earlier in 1990s, he propounded many important suggestions that had been adopted by the central government, for example, establishing tax share distribution system between central and local government (1993), reducing the disparities of regional development (1994), prohibiting the army of engaging in commerce (1994), creating jobs as most priority goal of economic development (1997), balance between social development and economic development (2000), new conception of development based on people - centred (2000,2004).

Offshore tax havens African Policy Group had proposed three topics for the G8 agenda, a global system of tax information sharing /

Safavian shared findings from a survey of American retailers conducted earlier this year on the impact of the border adjustable tax and the provisions of the House Republican Tax Reform Blueprint in their entirety (i.e. 20 % rate, full expensing, territorial tax systetax and the provisions of the House Republican Tax Reform Blueprint in their entirety (i.e. 20 % rate, full expensing, territorial tax systeTax Reform Blueprint in their entirety (i.e. 20 % rate, full expensing, territorial tax systetax system).

Under the political banner that each corporation should pay «its fair share» of corporate tax, the final reports from the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) working groups that were released in October1 call for «bold moves by policy makers to restore confidence in the system and ensure that profits are taxed where economic activities take place and value is created.»

Despite the apparent consensus in the BEPS Reports, each country's view of «fair share» will be different Paying a «fair share» is a difficult concept in a «rule of law» tax system like Canada whose courts have eschewed «substance over form» in their decisions.

In some cases, they are also raising revenues by sharing the tax base with federal and provincial governments through a regulatory framework for First Nation tax systems.

The new system raises additional difficulties, especially for small cryptoexchanges, since «The new system also requires cryptocurrency exchanges to share users» transaction data with banks, a move that could potentially allow the government to impose taxes down the line.»

In late November, HFS executed a definitive agreement to acquire Jackson Hewitt Inc. (JTAX), the second largest tax preparation service system in the United States, with locations in 41 states, for approximately $ 480 million cash or $ 68 per common share.

My thinking is that by sharing the system and process, and then in future columns sharing some actual stories / cases that followed the steps of the process with success, I will be able to help you remove the fear and intimidation factor from taxes.

Get free consumer brochures to share with your clients on financing, property taxes, carbon monoxide detector requirements, septic systems and much more.