Another missive from Jim Stanford in the Globe prompted this post from Stephen that leads to some interesting points of comparison between the Nordic model and the Canadian status quo: Welfare states can be competitive Jim Stanford sets aside
our shared scepticism about the WEF -LSB-...]
He's confident voters
share his scepticism rather than Mr Murphy's «desire for ever closer integration».
I'm pleased someone
shares my scepticism about the cherry - picked data and warped methodology of the New School Network's «research» into the alleged characteristics of the top - performed and worst - performing schools.
I share the scepticism that it will replace them.
Not exact matches
Investors viewed the StarBev deal with
scepticism, sending
shares down 5 % the day the purchase was announced.
This deep
scepticism regarding the elitist nature and the technocratic paradigm of the European project was
shared by a range of European thinkers ranging from Habermas to Solana and Delors.
Mr Crabb
shares with his predecessor a long stated
scepticism about the value of devolution, calling it in the past a form of «constitutional vandalism», and he will thus face legitimate questions about his commitment to the devolved settlement and his desire to take it forward.
This
scepticism led one primary school head to state: «You start worrying me when you say
shared».
Sweden has its
share of
scepticism about running schools for profit.
I hope you will not think too poorly of Brisbane, most people I talk to here, including science academics,
share a degree of
scepticism as well.
It is not because most climate scientists do not
share your level of
scepticism, and are probably more focused on the detailed observations of forcings during the climate model era (the last 30 - odd years).
When you write «most climate scientists do not
share your level of
scepticism» it worries me.
The few I know of still
share the view that AGW is basically correct — it is in aspects of the intricacies of the technical arguments that they have some
scepticism.