Not exact matches
But the trade - off of this focus on
shareholder value is spending that
benefits other stakeholders,
like employees and customers, said Bill George, the former CEO of medical - device company Medtronic.
Likewise, unless there is a clear
benefit in some terms other than pure business (
like marketing or potential tax breaks), no board of directors will risk
shareholder wrath on new tech either.
I understand market cap in ownership sizing are the likely factors but does it still to invest for the
shareholders»
benefit in a company,
like, Seritage that might have a significant upside and where are you putting your personal to work?
The folks at Seafarer argue that they would
like as many
shareholders as possible to
benefit from lower expenses, so they're trying to manage an arrangement by which their institutional share class might actually be considered the «universal» share class.
The issuing company might not
benefit at all because the shares are offered for sale by private
shareholders, such as directors or other insiders (
like venture capitalists) looking to diversify their holdings.
And
like those structures, REITS have some great
benefits, including tax free status if they pay out 90 % of their earnings to owners (
shareholders).
You'll want to include information
like: the name and contact information of the person (s) organizing the corporation; the name and a description of the corporation, including its primary activities, business address, and any known details
like the expected annual revenue; information on the terms of the board of directors; rules on stock ownership and purchases; the contact information for the corporation's president, vice president, secretary and treasurer; the contact information and positions of key employees; how
shareholders can approve corporate action; any
benefits offered by the corporation; and more.
Conceptually it is a lot
like someone suing himself (yes I know the companies are different legal persons, but still); one could argue that the
shareholders did
benefit from the fraud while it was ongoing yet no customer can sue them.