Not exact matches
To be eligible for this tax break the corporation must not design a plan that
benefits only the
shareholders / owners.
Noble says the restructuring plan, which has the backing of over 83 percent of its senior creditors, will
benefit all stakeholders and an insolvency is the
only alternative if
shareholders do not approve its proposal.
Known as the limited - liability company (LLC), this structure offers the best of all corporate worlds for many new businesses: personal - asset protection (normally available
only to
shareholders of C corporations), elimination of corporate - level taxes (a
benefit normally reserved for partners or S - corporation owners), and flexible ownership rules (which S corporations in particular lack).
In other words, a corporate tax cut would
benefit investors and
shareholders, with
only a small effect on wages.
[25] A rational
shareholder will expend the effort necessary to make informed decisions
only if the expected
benefits outweigh the costs of doing so.
Because the company has a call option that it can (and will) use to its own
benefit (and to the
shareholder's detriment as its counterparty), preferred shares end up offering all of the potential price downside of long - term fixed income securities, with
only a small amount of the potential price upside.
«If you were to sell the business through an IPO you wouldn't be able to give the (capital gains tax) rollover relief
benefit to
shareholders, the CGT rollover relief is
only available through a demerger.
The
only people
benefiting from the new stadium will be the owner and the the main
shareholders when they sell up.
The
only people that will
benefit are
shareholders and owners.
It means we have to end the situation where the chief executive wants to make decisions which will
benefit his company in five years, when some of his
shareholders are
only interested in results in the next two months.
The
benefits of gender balanced boards are well documented, not
only do women serve to better represent the needs and wants of
shareholders, but they bring a fresh dynamic and a skillset that enriches the boardroom.
But investors obviously aren't prepared to give management any
benefit of the doubt here, and to date the company's cash pile has been inaccessible (& therefore «worthless» in many respects)-- realistically, a decent return from here is
only going to be delivered via a sale or liquidation of the company, with the cash pile returned to deserving
shareholders (now the
only logical step, with acquisitions killed off & presuming the restructuring ensures profitability).
The Firm may submit a
shareholder proposal on behalf of an Investment Fund
only if permitted by the Investment Fund's governing documents or by agreement between the Firm and the Investment Fund and if the Firm believes that the proposal would provide a substantial overall
benefit to the Investment Fund.
The Court indeed starts by recalling its case - law according to which «in order to assess whether the same measure would have been adopted in normal market conditions by a private investor in a situation as close as possible to that of the State,
only the
benefits and obligations linked to the situation of the State as
shareholder — to the exclusion of those linked to its situation as a public authority — are to be taken into account.»
A
shareholder needs
only one share to have standing to sue a B corporation for failing to serve its specified public
benefit.
The ABS, its owners and its
shareholders may not access privileged client information without express client consent and then
only for the client's
benefit;