Sentences with phrase «shareholders returns even»

I am sure most investors who follow Indian markets know of many more examples of companies with long duration CAPs, which have, in the past, delivered exceptional long - term shareholders returns even if entry prices were «seemingly high».

Not exact matches

Shareholder returns at family - controlled corporations significantly outperform those of widely held public companies, even though family - controlled boards tend to break governance rules, such as having a certain number of independent directors.

Even worse, fund managers pursuing this strategy typically saw their new category underperform their old one, further hurting returns for shareholders.

We can expect an even bigger return of capital to shareholders this year with the resumption of buybacks in October.

Overall, cash returned to shareholders is much lower today — even with the recent surge instigated by activist campaigns — than in decades past when the economy enjoyed much more robust growth.

Some investors argue that massive share - price increases in 2014 mean that even future successes won't produce strong returns for shareholders buying in at today's prices, but the demand among top pharmaceutical companies for promising drug candidates to add to their pipelines shows few signs of slowing anytime soon, and that could bode well for the sector in the coming year.

CEO Richard Davis admits it's merely to please shareholders hungry for loan growth, even if it'll fall short of the bank's 15 pct return of equity.

Even though cheap high - quality companies buying back their stock produces great returns for their shareholders, it doesn't mean that Johnson & Johnson will choose to allocate capital in this manner.

Given present market conditions, shareholders can be certain that I will continue to take an even - handed approach to both the risks and potential returns of the markets.

Stronger iPhone prices and hints by Apple Inc on Thursday that it could return more than half of its $ 285 billion in cash to shareholders eased concerns among investors, even as the world's biggest technology company gave a disappointing revenue outlook for the current quarter.

Shareholders pay taxes on the income through their personal tax returns, even though it is not distributed.

There's also the possibility that companies connected to donors may benefit through related party transactions or even, as admitted by Wey Education PLC, that its charitable «vehicle» operating academies would help establish a business «capable of making a return to shareholders».

I'll be honest: Even though the term is widely used, I don't like «returning cash to shareholders» when it is applied to buyback programs.

Through a combination of increasing dividends and aggressive share repurchases, Chubb's high shareholder yield allows it to give investors good returns even without core growth, and in this case, the company would have roughly doubled your money if you had invested seven years ago and reinvested all dividends.

Also of importance for investing purposes, the dividends are paid even when the stock price falls — so many times it is the only positive return for the shareholders.

To clarify even further, two companies generating the same earnings growth will tend to produce similar long - term returns for their shareholders.

So for this wonderful business, even paying 25 times earnings worked out to a stellar return for shareholders of around 13 % annually for 15 years even as the P / E multiple contracted from 25 all the way down to 10, which would be a very low multiple for a great business like this.

Once (or should I say if) this pension / labour dispute is put to rest, I'd actually expect a rapid & substantial improvement in shareholder value — this might be a substantial return of capital or a tender offer (to distribute surplus cash), and / or a potential new partnership or even a takeover offer..?!

In other words don't count on that cash being returned to shareholders or even invested in passive investments (private or public equity) for the benefit of shareholders; A liquidation valuation really isn't of interest here as Glassbridge is set to be an ongoing business and I can see an operating cash bleed for 3 - 5 years depending on how long it takes the company to attract enough AUM to cover operating (read staffing) costs.

Even when a fund manages to beat the market in a given year, expenses often eat up a substantial portion of its returns, leaving little net profit for shareholders.

Even with very modest sales growth, a dedicated focus on margins, cash flow, and frequent & substantial returns of capital (via buybacks & tenders), will almost invariably produce superior long - term shareholder returns.

If the returns on production are falling, or even loss making, it may be more valuable for shareholders to just leave the oil in the ground for the moment — and to maximise future pricing / profits.

Management has proven they are shareholder friendly, not giving dilutive options and share grants, conserving cash and even returning cash to shareholders that they feel they can't deploy (a $ 1 / share — equivalent to $ 10 post reverse split — dividend in December 2009).

Surely TVC shareholders deserve even a tiny slice of any future action in return for their unstinting generosity over the years?!

You should probably have a tax professional help you with that (generally advisable when doing corporation returns, even if its a small S corp with a single shareholder).

Otherwise, the company retains the fire - power to repeat the exercise (with another tender offer, and / or open market buybacks), and create / return even more value to shareholders.

Going back a bit further, No Mother 3 or even the second, and much better, Fire Emblem DS title just feels «soulless» to me as small risk, likely limited - return projects that would nevertheless be unlikely to lose money... Perhaps they are too concerned with weighing down the divisions ROI figure, a curt nod towards shareholders over customers: / All that said, Tom, it is probably too early to write off a brand new platform.