Sentences with phrase «shares global government»

50 % in VWRL (Vanguard Global Stock ETF), 50 % in IGLO (I shares Global government bonds), rebalance annually and just leave it there until I hit 55.

Not exact matches

Of course, in the post-Snowden era, global corporations must walk a fine line when it comes to sharing information with the U.S. government, as battles around privacy, encryption and regulatory oversight continue to bubble below the surface.

Global miner Barrick Gold has announced a deal with the Tanzanian government that involves a 50:50 sharing of benefits from its operations in the country, prompting sharp price movements in local stocks exposed to the region.

These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).

Share: FacebookTwitterLinkedinGoogle + email VICTORIA — The global shift to electric cars is well underway, bringing with it big changes for drivers, industries and governments around the world.

In fact, China is seen to expand its share of the global EV battery market to 70 percent over the next three years, with the notable help of the government.

S&P Global Ratings senior analysts will share their views, answer questions and engage in discussions focused on State and Local Government credit trends and outlooks for 2018.

Given associated government revenue shares in GDP, the latter achievement would also unlock an additional $ 1.4 trillion in global tax revenue, most of it ($ 940 billion) in emerging economies, suggesting the potential self - financing effects of additional public investment into closing global gender gaps.

Dec 28 Indian shares were little changed on Thursday ahead of expiry of derivatives contracts and on lingering concerns over government borrowing exceeding target, but metals stocks such as Vedanta Ltd rose tracking global commodity prices.

Half a century after Independence, as of now, we have the largest population of poor people in the world, one third of our rural population is below the poverty line and despite the UN agencies» massive aid projects, the development assistance of the World Bank, bilateral aid, the Center and State governments» intervention, the gap between the rich and the poor has doubled in the last three decades - fifteen years ago the lowest 20 per cent of global population received 2.5 per cent of global wealth whereas at present, the share has been reduced to less than 1.3 per cent.

Government monopolies over information and technology are being broken down as scientists, engineers and visionaries share their dreams and discoveries via the global network of modern communication.

Speaking at the opening ceremony, Dr. R.R.A. Wijekoon, Director General of Agriculture, Government of Sri Lanka, said «This will strengthen rice research development activities in the country especially to ensure food and nutrition security and sharing of global innovative technologies for the country's successful rice production.»

This annual conference allows students, academic researchers, industry professionals and government agents to network, share ideas and brainstorm new initiatives for improving global food security policies.

Every year, experts from retail, manufacturing, food service industries, governments and service providers meet at the Global Food Safety Conference to share knowledge and promote collaborative approaches to managing food safety.

The theme «Towards a Common Future» will afford Heads of Government in the Commonwealth the opportunity to address the shared global challenges we face and agree on actions on how to create a better future for all.

Those proposals include a $ 500 million investment in broadband Internet access in rural upstate areas, the creation of an infrastructure bank, using $ 500 million from the state's surplus to further provide incentives to local governments to consolidate and share services and the Global NY initiative, meant to promote overseas trade of state businesses.

A statement signed by Director of Communications at the Presidency, Eugene Arhin, indicates the weeklong meeting will afford Heads of Government in the Commonwealth the opportunity to «address the shared global challenges we face, and agree actions on how to create a better future for all».

The event which begins April 16, 2018 and ends April 20, 2018 under the theme «Towards a Common Future» will afford Heads of Government in the Commonwealth the opportunity to «address the shared global challenges we face, and agree on actions on how to create a better future for all».

But David Karoly and Clive Hamilton note that the Australian government also agreed to do its fair share to keep global temperature rise below 2 °C, which is a key objective of the Paris accord.

Such scaremongering is especially painful to me because even though I do not think that government - approved GMO foods pose meaningful health risks to consumers, and even though I believe strategic genetic engineering can be an important tool to ease human suffering on our warming and resource - constrained planet, I share the concerns of many environmentalists about the homogenization and consolidation of the global food system — trends that are accelerated by the spread of industrially produced GMOs.

As those schemes are disconnected from each other, governments have proposed launching a framework to unite them under a single voluntary platform to share ideas, with a view to eventually launching a global market to battle climate change.

Meanwhile, the episode prompted the U.S. government to rapidly restart a long, moribund process aimed at tightening oversight of so - called «dual use» research — and WHO to complain that the deal could imperil a carefully negotiated global agreement to share flu viruses and research results.

As president of MIT, he was active in science, technology, and innovation policy; building partnerships among academia, government and industry; and championing open, global scientific communication, travel, and the sharing of intellectual resources.

Johnson outlined in the Guardian the view that tuition fees allow the Government to reconcile its three policy objectives for undergraduate higher education: to reduce inequality, to fund institutions on a level which facilitates global competitiveness, and also to share the cost «between the individual student benefitting from a graduate earnings premium and taxpayers in general, most of whom will not have attended university.»

Compare Putnam funds in FundVisualizer: Select a Putnam fund to compare Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund Putnam Pennsylvania Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Putnam PanAgora Risk Parity Fund Putnam Global Sector Fund Putnam Putnam PanAgora Managed Futures Strategy Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Putnam Putnam PanAgora Market Neutral Fund Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Putnam Global Equity Fund Putnam Equity Spectrum Fund Putnam George Putnam Balanced Fund Putnam Global Income Trust Putnam Global Health Care Fund Putnam Short Duration Income Fund Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Putnam High Yield Fund Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund Putnam New Jersey Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2060 Fund Putnam Multi-Asset Absolute Return Fund Putnam Government Money Market Fund (A Shares) Putnam Equity Income Fund Putnam Europe Equity Fund Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Putnam New York Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund Putnam Retirement Income Fund Lifestyle 1 Putnam Ohio Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam International Equity Fund Putnam Small Cap Value Fund Putnam Massachusetts Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Diversified Income Trust Putnam Convertible Securities Fund Putnam California Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Global Financials Fund Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund Putnam Global Consumer Fund Putnam International Capital Opportunities Fund Putnam International Value Fund Putnam Global Telecommunications Fund Putnam Global Natural Resources Fund Putnam Money Market Fund (A Shares) Putnam Global Technology Fund Putnam Global Industrials Fund Putnam Tax - Free High Yield Fund Putnam Capital Opportunities Fund Putnam Global Utilities Fund Putnam Research Fund Putnam Minnesota Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Putnam AMT - Free Municipal Fund Putnam Absolute Return 100 Fund Putnam Short - Term Municipal Income Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund Putnam International Growth Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2045 Fund Putnam Intermediate - Term Municipal Income Fund Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund Putnam Income Fund Putnam Sustainable Future Fund Putnam Emerging Markets Income Fund Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Putnam Investors Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2020 Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund

Given the large push the Chinese government is making to open up mainland China shares to the global investing population another potential USD 3.8 trillion of investable market capitalization could be accessible for inclusion in the global benchmarks.

Compare Putnam funds in FundVisualizer: Select a Putnam fund to compare Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund Putnam Pennsylvania Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Putnam PanAgora Risk Parity Fund Putnam Global Sector Fund Putnam Putnam PanAgora Managed Futures Strategy Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Putnam Putnam PanAgora Market Neutral Fund Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Putnam Global Equity Fund Putnam Equity Spectrum Fund Putnam George Putnam Balanced Fund Putnam Global Income Trust Putnam Global Health Care Fund Putnam Short Duration Income Fund Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Putnam High Yield Fund Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund Putnam New Jersey Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2060 Fund Putnam Multi-Asset Absolute Return Fund Putnam Government Money Market Fund (A Shares) Putnam Equity Income Fund Putnam Europe Equity Fund Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Putnam New York Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund Putnam Retirement Income Fund Lifestyle 1 Putnam Ohio Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam International Equity Fund Putnam Small Cap Value Fund Putnam Massachusetts Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Diversified Income Trust Putnam Convertible Securities Fund Putnam California Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Global Financials Fund Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund Putnam Global Consumer Fund Putnam International Capital Opportunities Fund Putnam International Value Fund Putnam Global Telecommunications Fund Putnam Global Natural Resources Fund Putnam Money Market Fund (A Shares) Putnam Global Technology Fund Putnam Global Industrials Fund Putnam Tax - Free High Yield Fund Putnam Capital Opportunities Fund Putnam Global Utilities Fund Putnam Research Fund Putnam Minnesota Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Putnam AMT - Free Municipal Fund Putnam Absolute Return 100 Fund Putnam Short - Term Municipal Income Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund Putnam International Growth Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2045 Fund Putnam Intermediate - Term Municipal Income Fund Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund Putnam Income Fund Putnam Sustainable Future Fund Putnam Low Volatility Equity Fund Putnam Emerging Markets Income Fund Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Putnam Investors Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2020 Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund

For example, at Global Pet Expo, APPA coordinates Government Affairs subcommittee meetings featuring guest speakers who are experts in their field to share their knowledge in areas that will help APPA members grow their businesses.

It's one thing for anti-whaling campaigners, at great risk and cost, to dog Japanese vessels to chronicle the slaughter of whales on the shared global ocean — far beyond the ability of governments or media to track.

By: Cara Condit, Director for Arctic Study and Policy, U.S. Coast Guard Academy The U.S. Coast Guard Center for Arctic Study and Policy (CASP) organized the recent «Governing Across the Waves Workshop: Global Insights for Transboundary Waterways Management in Sensitive and Congested Maritime Spaces,» which aimed to support the ongoing efforts by the U.S. and Russian governments to achieve the shared objectives in the Bering Strait region of safe, secure, and environmentally responsible maritime traffic.

It is not clear from the letter whether these senators will refuse to support any legislation that does not require sanctions of any government that refuses to reduce its GHG emissions to levels agreed to by the US or only those governments that are already exceeding their fair share of safe global emissions.

The equity debate has taken on some new life lately, particularly in India, where the government is actively reconsidering its position on fair - shares approaches to global climate diplomacy.

As DeSmogBlog has revealed, Charles Koch is a long - standing member of the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS)-- a global group of industrialists, academics and economists who share the «neoliberal» ideology of limiting government control.

Here's what is required (leaving aside Theresa May's electorally hamstrung inability to deliver much of it): The entire cabinet and every business leader the government's black book can muster, on stage for the launch of the new strategy; an explicit declaration that this, full decarbonization of the economy, is the post-Brexit economic strategy; clear and attractive retail policies, such as a diesel scrappage scheme, tax breaks for green investment, new apprenticeships, a green home building program; an open invitation to all opposition party leaders to share a platform to support the plan with a declaration that while they may not agree on every component they fully endorse the over-arching goal; a willingness to shame those party leaders who play party politics and refuse to turn up; a fortnight - long program where each day sees a new cabinet member explain how the plan will transform parts of the economy; a Royal Commission on the flaws of GDP as an economic measure and the viability of alternative quality of life metrics; and, yes, a brave assertion that carbon intensive industries will have to transform or be scaled back, backed by a decarbonization adaptation fund to help affected communities respond to this global trend.

These governments «share a common goal to develop breakthrough technologies and substantial cost reductions to enable the global community to meet our shared climate goals,» said the White House.

Global Witness, the International Transport Workers» Federation (ITF), and the UN Panel of Experts on Liberia are critical of the murky nature of the new agreement, whose draft terms of reference state that all information, including notes and final assessments, are the sole property of the government of Liberia and can not be shared without direct approval (ii).

If the total society - wide cap, before it is allocated among emitters within the jurisdiction of the government allocating the cap, is less than the government's fair share of safe global emissions, then the cap is not environmentally just particularly to those who are vulnerable to climate change.

The conventional belief that global warming would soon melt the Arctic, and make economic the large - scale infrastructure needed to operate in its inhospitable environment, had many in the oil industry — and in governments — gearing up to claim their share of this new frontier.

This is so because in addition to the theological reasons given by Pope Francis recently: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.

(Brown, 2009) Because each nation or government has a duty to reduce its emissions to its fair share of safe global emissions (Brown et al, 2006), justice requires that caps be consistent with the government's ghg reduction obligations.

This is so because: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.

These features include: (a) it is a problem caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of ghgs in one part of the world who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people and who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, and, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people, nations must act quickly to limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions.

When you argue that nations such as the United States or states, regional, or local governments, businesses, organizations, or individuals that emit high levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) need not reduce their ghg emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions because of scientific uncertainty about adverse climate change impacts:

Sustainable Energy for All, a global coalition of governments, the private sector, civil society, and international organizations, aims to achieve this while also doubling the amount of renewable energy in the global energy mix from its current share of 18 percent to 36 percent by 2030.

However, a counter argument can be made that a regime is just if total emissions from the area within the jurisdiction of the government are below the government's fair share of safe global emission regardless of whether some emitters are not covered by the government's ghg allocation because governments have the right to make decisions distributing the burdens and benefits of government policies within their jurisdiction.

If the allowances that entities are allocated by the government are not sufficient to assure that the entity's emissions are no greater than its fair share of safe global emissions, an argument can be made that their individual allocation is unjust.

All nations, sub-national governments, businesses, organizations, and individuals must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions.

Those nations, sub-national governments, organizations, businesses, and individuals that are emitting greenhouse gases above their fair share of safe global emissions have obligations, duties, and responsibilities for the costs of adaptation or damages to those who are harmed or will be harmed by climate change.

Because it has been scientifically well established that there is a great risk of catastrophic harm from human - induced change (even though it is acknowledged that there are remaining uncertainties about timing and magnitude of climate change impacts), no high - emitting nation, sub-national government, organization, business, or individual of greenhouse gases may use some remaining scientific uncertainty about climate change impacts as an excuse for not reducing its emissions to its fair share of safe global greenhouse gas emission on the basis of scientific uncertainty.

There also may be regional and local governments, organizations, businesses, and individuals in developing countries that are exceeding their fair share of safe global emissions.