The strikingly clear and
sharp screen looks great any time, but it really comes into its own when watching films.
Not exact matches
The 5.5 - inch Full HD (1080p)
screen looks sharp and bright, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 and 2 GB of RAM make it fairly fast, the 13 - megapixel camera takes respectable photos, and the software is clean Android that's upgradeable to Android 7.0 Nougat right now.
The latter's 6 - inch
screen packs more pixels (1,280 x 800) than the Fire, so it
looks considerably
sharper.
If you've programmed an iPhone app, you know that it doesn't
look any
sharper until you reprogram it for the
sharper screen.
«Our technique distorts the image such that, when the intended user
looks at the
screen, the image will appear
sharp to that particular viewer,» said Barsky.
In theory, standard - res graphics on a high - res
screen look exactly as
sharp as they always did, thanks to pixel doubling.
On the
screen of my camera they
looked pretty
sharp, but on my computer they turned out not to be as
sharp as I thought.
The thing that hits you first about this film is it
looks sharp, the opening credits are damn nice and Murphy
looks his coolest since «Beverly Hills», its a slow builder for sure but with Wincott as the baddie with his raspy devilish voice it keeps you glued to the
screen.
About Photo # 3926103: Amiah Miller and Andy Serkis
looked sharp at the
screening of their new film War for the Planet of the Apes tonight!
Amiah Miller and Andy Serkis
looked sharp at the
screening of their new film War for the Planet of the Apes tonight!
Whether on a 4K TV or the Switch's handheld
screen, it
looks sharp and detailed.
It's easy to forget that the baseline attractiveness of Hollywood is so ridiculously high when you spend all day watching TV shows and movies, but The Disaster Artist throws this into
sharp relief: if you don't
look just right in real life, you'll
look totally wrong on the big
screen.
With the practical, the objects or aliens on
screen look sharp and very believable.
We do like Cadillac's large nav
screen with its
sharp -
looking graphics, and the ATS coupe further burnishes its tech cred with Powermat wireless charging of compatible devices, located in a hidden cubby behind the motorized CUE panel.
But as modern and cool as the whole thing seems, and as sleek as it
looks (the graphics are very
sharp), it requires more eyes - off - the - road time than more conventional solutions, particularly given the small touch points for some of the on -
screen functions.
A testament to the size of this car, the 12.3 - inch touchscreen
looks tiny nestled into its perch on the dashboard, the
screen itself is fairly responsive and features
sharp graphics, but its recessed position makes it a bit harder to reach.
Sorry,
looks boring, the old model
looks sharper... also I hate cars that have stick out
screens, shame that BMW is copying Audi in this regard
The two 12.3 - inch
screens (one for the instrumentation and one for the infotainment) have been merged into a single unit and honestly speaking with its stunningly
sharp and clear graphics, this
screen looks class apart.
The dash - mounted rev counter feels and
looks flimsy but the optional seven - inch floating sat - nav
screen looks sharp and the menu system is easy to navigate.
At the back, the new, steeply raked
screen and
sharp LED tail - lights give the Estate a sportier
look than you'd expect from a car measuring 4,856 mm in length — 23 mm more than the hatch.
The dual
screen infotainment system itself is hugely clever,
sharp to
look at and instantly impressive.
While it doesn't have the same, easy - on - the - eye e-ink display as a dedicated ereader, the HD
screen is
sharp and text
looks good.
The Aura is great, but the
screen in my opinion is dimmer than other readers when I don't use the front light indoors, I'm
looking for something also with a
sharper text, this is why I was thinking to switch to Kindle PW2, but I like the Kobo flexibility more.
Standalone video files played well in full
screen mode and
looked extra
sharp, particularly with 720p and 1080p files; DivX and XviD files were also no problem.
Built for reading Designed to
look and read like real paper, Kindle's E-Ink
screen uses ink particles and hand - built fonts to display
sharp, dark text that reads like a printed page.
It has a pin -
sharp, backlit,
screen and
looks fantastic.
I would say the
screen transitions were
sharper, and animations — which are tough to do on E-ink in the first place —
looked a bit smoother.
The most striking feature is its gorgeous 1920 x 1080 display, which
looks even
sharper than normal on the smaller device — it's a really good
screen, but it creates some consequences.
Furthermore the e-Reader has a large 8 - inch
screen to make reading that little bit easier, and the display manages to make the text
look impressively
sharp.
Revolutionary electronic - paper display provides a
sharp, high - resolution
screen that
looks and reads like real paper.
On an LCD
screen like the Tab Pro, things are
sharp enough but
look a little washed - out and bloodless.
im most
looking for a tablet for videos, youtube and mainly XBMC, which of theses 3 tablets would be most suitable and which has the
sharpest and most vivid
screen and most smooth performance?
it comes with a
sharp, high resolution electronic paper display
screen that
looks and reads like real paper.
Another slight advantage for the Nook is the fact that the
screen looks a bit clearer and
sharper than the
screen on the Kindle Paperwhite.
The retina
screen does what it's supposed to; graphics
looks sharp and bright, while small text becomes clear and readable.
Side by side the Voyage
screen looks sharper due to the contrast.
Text is incredibly
sharp, no matter the font size, and images
look great, so comics really pop (though keep in mind you're still working with a black - and - white E Ink
screen).
The high resolution (265ppi) E Ink
screen looks great, text is clear and
sharp, and the frontlighting is evenly distributed across the
screen.
Some users also find that the Oasis
screen image
looks washed - out compared to the amazingly
sharp contrast of the Voyage.
The 4.3 - inch, 540 - by -960-pixel qHD capacitive touch
screen looks rich and
sharp; it's a PenTile display, which some people vehemently dislike, but I didn't mind it.
Compared to the Kobo Aura, the Nook's
screen looks better to me because it is less yellow and more white, and text appears
sharper and clearer.
To the Nook Tablet's credit, Netflix videos
looked much
sharper on its
screen; scenes from The Expendables showed noticeable pixelation on the Fire.
The
screen is 300DPI, which makes it one of the
sharpest on the market, and really helps with making the letters appear clearer on the display... kind of important if all you're going to be doing is
looking at words while using this thing.
HTC's Sense UI 2.1
looks sharp and friendly, with upgraded apps, seven customizable home
screens, and strong contact management.
The 1024 x 768 plastic eInk display
looked really
sharp and was a pleasure to
look at as text popped of the
screen like bold letters typed onto paper.
In an LCD phone a 720p display would offer a pretty
sharp image, but thanks to the phone's PenTile - type OLED
screen, it
looks a little fuzzy.
The Amazon site states: «Revolutionary electronic - paper display provides a
sharp, high - resolution
screen that
looks and reads like real paper.»
Its colors are perhaps not as vibrant as some
screens, but graphics
look sharp.
Its 800 x 400 WVGA resolution may not be as
sharp as the qHD displays (960 x 540) on other phones such as the HTC Sensation 4G, but the Galaxy S II's
screen looks great.
The 3.7 - inch display uses what I'd call the minimum resolution for a high - end Android phone, 800 × 840, but the Super LCD
screen looks sharp and bright, both indoors and out.