We've seen
the shelter intake per capita drop year over year since we first started in Austin.
Today, the best estimates are that we have only one - fifth or less
shelter intake per thousand people as we had in 1970.
Not exact matches
Peter's analysis of the impact of targeted spay / neuter services states that spaying or neutering five animals
per 1,000 people in low - income areas will reduce
shelter intake by as much as 33 percent over a five - year period.
The Montgomery County Animal
Shelter confirmed that since TLC opened, we have reduced the cat and dog total intake at the shelter by almost 600 animals per month during their peak intake
Shelter confirmed that since TLC opened, we have reduced the cat and dog total
intake at the
shelter by almost 600 animals per month during their peak intake
shelter by almost 600 animals
per month during their peak
intake months!
Michigan's
shelter intake in 2015 was about 14 animals
per 1000 people, which puts it on the low end of the average range of
intake.
After two years,
per capita
shelter intake was 3.5 times higher and
per capita
shelter euthanasia was 17.5 times higher in the nontarget area than in the target area.
Villa Michelle has an
intake of around 8,500 animals
per year, making it one of the largest
shelters on the island.
Of the No Kill
shelters I've studied, the ones that have
intake per 1000 people of 40 or 50 or more generally seem to use transports a lot, or adopt animals to people outside of their own jurisdiction, in order to get to a 90 % or better live release rate.
By comparison, average
shelter intake today is estimated to be about 22
per 1000 people.
Shelter intake relative to human population back in the 1970s was about 110
per 1000 people, if not more.
In 2016, our
shelter intake was 49.2 animals
per 1,000 Chaffee County residents.
Intake at the
shelter can be as high as 37,000 animals
per year.
Together with our Maddie's Fund Community Partners, we work closely with Alachua County's municipal public
intake shelter, Alachua County Animal Services to reduce the euthanasia rate from over 7,000
per year to under 1,000.
With around 25 full - time staff members and an annual
intake between 4,000 and 5,000 animals
per year, the
shelter has excelled at making relatively limited resources go a long way toward saving lives.
The average Pets
Per Thousand People (remember this is really «
shelter intake» not «pets») in the United States is estimated at 15 to 30.
As the animal
shelter exclusively responsible for service to the City of Camden, as well as one of the top treatment providers in the County, we
intake approximately 5,000 animals
per year from 18 municipalities in Camden County.
I don't think there is anything significantly wrong with the data going in, because the average
intake for the
shelters I list was 33
per thousand people, and that is near the estimated average for the United States of 15 to 30 pets
per thousand people.
We have also reduced the
intake at the Conroe Animal
Shelter to 700 animals
per year which is a 14 % reduction from last year.
(Average
shelter intake in the United States is thought to be 15 to 30 pets
per thousand people.)
The Fulton County
shelter is an open admission
shelter with an average
intake of 30 new animals
per day.
The two boroughs without full service
shelters, the Bronx and Queens, will maintain
intake facilities for «lost, stray or homeless dogs and cats» 7 days
per week, 12 hours each day.
Average
shelter intake in the United States is estimated to be around 22 dogs and cats
per thousand people, although it varies widely from one location to another.
For example, a city of 600,000 people served by a
shelter that has
intake of 10,000 cats and dogs
per year has an IPTP for cats and dogs of 10000 / 600 = 17.
It is calculated the same way as IPTP, except that the number of
shelter adoptions
per year is used instead of the
intake number.
The
shelter had an
intake rate of 14,000 animals
per year and disastrously low adoption rates.
Background
Per capita
shelter intake and euthanasia have been in a steady decline nationwide for the past several decades.
First, because
per capita
shelter intake and euthanasia are in decline due to a variety of reasons, it is impossible to determine the effect of an MSN law without comparing a community's trends in
shelter intake and euthanasia for several years before and after the law was enacted to trends in adjacent, similar communities without MSN legislation.
Conduct housing
intake and assessments,
per family; service 70 families, met monthly targets, successfully met
shelter turn over rate