Perhaps Jay would not defend higher education here, asserting instead that if we just
shift teacher prep to school districts or to private providers, they could all do it smarter or better.
Not exact matches
So as a result of the policies being pushed by Commissioner Stefan Pryor, Connecticut
teachers and students spent thousands of hours during the past school year
prepping and taking the Connecticut Mastery Test and state and local taxpayers spent tens of millions of dollars paying for the Connecticut Mastery Test but the man in charge of the entire testing scheme now says that «some of the more pronounced decreases in lower grades may be due to the
shift to the Common Core curriculum... [and]... Students using the new curriculum haven't covered some of the areas in the test.»
Alongside
teachers, I am curious how continuing annual testing in grades 3 - 8 and once in high school reduces «the burden of testing on students and
teachers, making sure that tests don't crowd out teaching and learning» and how the continued significance of student test scores (despite the law's important
shift to include multiple measures of success for students) will alter a test -
prep culture that narrows the curriculum.