Not exact matches
The Amsterdam - based InterAcademy Council — a group that represents 150 national scientific and engineering academies — released a report this week detailing how countries can
shift from burning coal and other greenhouse - gas emitting fuels to cleaner energy while also introducing modern forms of energy to the billions worldwide who rely on charcoal, firewood or even dung as their fuel.
The good news: the U.S. is making a tectonic
shift from burning coal to produce the majority of its electricity to using cleaner natural gas.
Cap - and - dividend assumes that the decreasing supply and rising price of carbon will
shift private investment
from new
coal burning plants to wind, solar, conservation and efficiency, and that public investment will not be needed for these purposes.
[Andy Revkin — The price differential between renewable energy sources and
coal burning is
shifting, but a 10 - year transformation is hard to foresee given the incredibly small base
from which solar is growing (see the solar link in the previous annotation) and the long timeline for boosting geothermal generation, among other issues.
Steven Davis of the University of California, Irvine, and Robert Socolow of Princeton (best known for his work dividing the climate challenge into carbon «wedges») have written «Commitment accounting of CO2 emissions,» a valuable new paper in Environmental Research Letters showing the value of
shifting from tracking annual emissions of carbon dioxide
from power plants to weighing the full amount of carbon dioxide that such plants,
burning coal or gas, could emit during their time in service.
A
shift away
from burning coal to cleaner natural gas and renewable sources has seen power sector emissions trend downwards since 2007.
In an apparent first salvo in a public relations campaign to
shift blame for the Kemper power plant boondoggle away
from himself and corporate management and onto state regulators, Southern Company chief executive officer Tom Fanning admitted that the Kemper plant is not economically viable as a
coal -
burning power plant.
It comes after emissions declined four out of the six years since their 2007 peak, due to efficiency gains and a
shift from using
coal to cleaner -
burning natural gas.
Given that emissions
from burning coal are the single biggest human source of climate changing greenhouse gases, the communique says that, the push for Coal is a betrayal of the commitment and obligation of governments under the United Nations to address climate change and shift to sustainable pathways.&ra
coal are the single biggest human source of climate changing greenhouse gases, the communique says that, the push for
Coal is a betrayal of the commitment and obligation of governments under the United Nations to address climate change and shift to sustainable pathways.&ra
Coal is a betrayal of the commitment and obligation of governments under the United Nations to address climate change and
shift to sustainable pathways.»
And when the energy - short 1970s turned into the energy surplus of the 1980s, RFF's angst
shifted to issues surrounding a human influence on global climate, primarily
from carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
from the
burning of
coal, oil, and natural gas.
In an apparent first salvo in a public relations campaign to
shift blame for the Kemper power plant boondoggle away
from himself and corporate management and onto state regulators, Southern Company chief executive officer Tom Fanning admitted this week that Kemper plant is not economically viable as a
coal -
burning power plant.
In an apparent first salvo in a public relations campaign to
shift blame for the Kemper power plant boondoggle away
from himself and corporate management and onto state regulators, Southern Company chief executive officer Tom Fanning admitted this week that the Kemper plant is not economically viable as a
coal -
burning power plant.