But I do agree with the Breakthrough point that an overemphasis on current events as the reason to pursue the decades - long task of
shifting global greenhouse emissions trajectories can backfire, and in more ways than they describe.
Not exact matches
«As business leaders, it is our belief that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweigh the costs of not acting... a sufficiently ambitious, international and comprehensive legally - binding United Nations agreement to reduce
greenhouse gas
emissions will provide business with the certainty it needs to scale up
global investment in low - carbon technologies... the
shift to a low - carbon economy will create significant business opportunities».
So if Australian smelters
shifted anywhere else,
global greenhouse gas
emissions would fall.
(Gothenburg, Sweden, 7 May, 2015): WWF's flag ship business programme Climate Savers is marking 15 years of corporate leadership in reducing
greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions by introducing a new measuring standard, reflecting the
global shift in the role of business in fighting climate change.
WWF: Corporate leadership is moving to match climate science; now we need governments to do their part (Gothenburg, Sweden, 7 May, 2015): WWF's flag ship business programme Climate Savers is marking 15 years of corporate leadership in reducing
greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions by introducing a new measuring standard, reflecting the
global shift in the role of business in fighting climate... Read More»
Limiting
global temperature rise to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels will require billions of dollars in investments each year to mitigate
greenhouse gas
emissions and
shift to low -
emissions development pathways.