But I do agree with the Breakthrough point that an overemphasis on current events as the reason to pursue the decades - long task of
shifting global greenhouse emissions trajectories can backfire, and in more ways than they describe.
Not exact matches
Despite a rise in clean, renewable energy supplies in certain countries, and a partial
shift from coal to natural gas in others,
global greenhouse gas pollution continues to rise — and at an increasing pace in the most recent years.
BEIJING — Having covered China's stance on
global warming since 1988, I've gotten attuned to the need to tread carefully when something is said that feels like a
shift in the official position of this
greenhouse gas giant.
«As business leaders, it is our belief that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweigh the costs of not acting... a sufficiently ambitious, international and comprehensive legally - binding United Nations agreement to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions will provide business with the certainty it needs to scale up
global investment in low - carbon technologies... the
shift to a low - carbon economy will create significant business opportunities».
But that would betray an ethical gap that extends far beyond the Beltway, to all of us — the tendency not to act in the common interest (limiting the
global buildup of
greenhouse gases that is raising the odds of disruptive climate
shifts), but instead mainly when a threat is right in our faces.
Global warming from the human - driven buildup of heat - trapping
greenhouse gases is seen by virtually all Arctic scientists as playing a growing role in driving the
shift in summers toward a largely open sea at the top of the world, with plenty of variations along the way.
«Future projections based on theory and high - resolution dynamical models consistently suggest that
greenhouse warming will cause the globally averaged intensity of tropical cyclones to
shift towards stronger storms,» Knutson et al. (2010); Grinsted et al. (2013) projected «a twofold to sevenfold increase in the frequency of Katrina magnitude events for a 1 °C rise in
global temperature.»
So if Australian smelters
shifted anywhere else,
global greenhouse gas emissions would fall.
By 1977, the Electric Power Research Institute, funded by the industry, was testifying in Congress that the
global warming consequences of
greenhouse gases could force a
shift away from fossil fuels, especially coal, a message that the group repeated in its house publication that year.
We must forget the obsession with
global anthropogenic
greenhouse warming alone plus the implementation of draconian
global mitigation actions and
shift our attention to local and regional climate and weather - related issues and any actionable adaptation measures that can be planned and implemented in order to avoid potential problems.
(Gothenburg, Sweden, 7 May, 2015): WWF's flag ship business programme Climate Savers is marking 15 years of corporate leadership in reducing
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by introducing a new measuring standard, reflecting the
global shift in the role of business in fighting climate change.
But many climate experts say that the problems are deep - rooted, and that a clearer picture of the local and
global impact of coming climate
shifts will emerge only if there is a substantial shuffling of the scientific bureaucracy and permanent support for basic monitoring of climate - influencing factors like the ebb and flow of
greenhouse gases.
The 1976 divide is the date of a widely acknowledged «climate
shift» (e.g. Trenberth, 1990) and seems to mark a time (see Chapter 9) when
global mean temperature began a discernable upward trend that has been at least partly attributed to increases in
greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere (see the TAR; IPCC 2001).
WWF: Corporate leadership is moving to match climate science; now we need governments to do their part (Gothenburg, Sweden, 7 May, 2015): WWF's flag ship business programme Climate Savers is marking 15 years of corporate leadership in reducing
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by introducing a new measuring standard, reflecting the
global shift in the role of business in fighting climate... Read More»
Limiting
global temperature rise to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels will require billions of dollars in investments each year to mitigate
greenhouse gas emissions and
shift to low - emissions development pathways.
Global Warming is the build up of carbon dioxide (
greenhouse gases) in the atmosphere trapping heat and causing increase temperature and
shifting weather patterns.
The 1976 divide is the date of a widely acknowledged «climate
shift» (e.g. Trenberth, 1990) and seems to mark a time (see Chapter 9) when the
global mean temperatures began a discernable upward trend that has been at least partly attributed to increases in
greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere... The picture prior to 1976 has essentially not changed and is therefore not repeated in detail here.
It is still called
global warming, a good description of the general
shift in average
global temperatures due to the
greenhouse warning effect of the addition of 35 billion tons of CO2 into the air each year from burning fossil fuels.