The visitors occasionally took their chances on the counter, but were more concerned with keeping their shape and didn't produce a single
shot on target in the match.
The Blues have not allowed their opponents a
single shot on target in four games this season; no other side has stopped opponents on more than two occasions.
It was a very tight game, they created very little number
of shots on target, one more than us, that's all.
2nd best and then take a quick corner to take the lead with their
only shot on target in the game so far.
Last season, we averaged 4.8
shots on target per game; this season, we're at 4.5 — so you might well argue that no, it's not superior at all.
We were lucky to get to half - time with a clean sheet, but we didn't get even one
shot on target which is simply not the way Arsenal play.
In a big game he hasn't been able to come up with a goal, or even a
good shot on target, despite many chances.
The total came from only 27
shots on target giving him an excellent conversion rate of 40 %, with a shooting accuracy of 54 %.
Too many CM in a team will only allow you to pass pass pass pass and pass with no goals or
shot on target recorded.
If it was reversed, with them creating 20
+ shots on target and owning possession overall, with us scoring three goals from three chances created on target.
We had 1
shot on target vs a team without a recognized striker for half the match at home.
But I think that we should have had more opportunities to score or at least place more
shots on target through our counter attacks.
Despite being on the top 4 of chances created 43 we have only managed to convert less than 5 % that is
inclusive shots on target.
Do we have a good amount
of shots on target and do we stop them flooding forward and having lots of shots themselves.
You play against a team with 23 per cent of the ball and they create more chances, have
more shots on target.
There were only two
shots on target from the home side and both of them ended in goals with the keeper possibly at fault for the first one at the near post.
What we can say though is that Liverpool's performance for this early part of the 2016/17 season has basically matched that of the best Premier League team statistically (in terms of
shots on target at least) from the last eight seasons.
82 ′ — Chelsea did not have their first
shot on target until the 82nd minute in their 3 - 0 thrashing at Arsenal on Saturday.
I really don't care that Juventus had more possession and just as
many shots on target as Fiorentina.
Newcastle were in the relegation zone prior to kickoff in North London, but had equal possession and twice as many
shots on target as the now - outright Premier League leaders.
It's only fair to point out that at this early stage of the campaign there are other teams with better
shots on target ratios than Liverpool; Southampton have posted 70.8 %, and Everton a remarkable 76.5 %.
Gray, with nine goals, had the most
shots on target with 19 but his ratio of a goal every 2.1 shots trails Slimani's return of one every 1.85 shots.
Van Gaal's side were unable to find the net against their London opponents, and indeed, only mustered one
shot on target during the course of the match.
Wenger's new signing scored the equilizer and the Chelsea side most put faith in couldn't
even shoot on target in the shoot out.
They aren't helping themselves out in being the side which has conceded the
most shots on target against them than any other Premier League team and they have conceded the joint-most amount of penalties.
Phrases with «shot on target»