Sentences with phrase «show about a court case»

Earlier this month, I was asked to be an expert witness on the Swift Justice show about a court case between a Seeking Arrangement Sugar Daddy member and two Sugar Babies.

Not exact matches

By contrast, I have heard of cases pertaining to some newer member states where the state in question would not even send a representative or written arguments to the court (here again I think it was about prejudicial questions, not infringement proceedings but it shows how specific countries approach EU litigation in general).

The President of the European Humanist Federation (EHF), David Pollock, said: «The European Court of Human Rights is an essential bastion of equality and non-discrimination but has shown signs of being politically intimidated — for example in the case about the Italian law compelling schools to display crucifixes.

The lead counsel for the 1,000 plaintiffs in the new round of Love Canal litigation has asked state Supreme Court Justice Richard Kloch Sr. to remove himself from the case, claiming he showed bias in remarks about past Love Canal cases in a newspaper article written by Kloch's daughter, and seemed to act a little too favorably to the local attorney for Occidental Chemical Co. during a past court sesCourt Justice Richard Kloch Sr. to remove himself from the case, claiming he showed bias in remarks about past Love Canal cases in a newspaper article written by Kloch's daughter, and seemed to act a little too favorably to the local attorney for Occidental Chemical Co. during a past court sescourt session.

Albany, NY — On this week's show, Alan talks with the executive director of New York's School Boards Association, Tim Kremer, about the status of the state's public schools, the long - running Campaign for Fiscal Equity court case, and their opinions on Education Commisioner Richard Mills and NYC Schools Chancellor Joel Klein.

A large presence of parents and community members at the argument will show the court that people care about this case and send a message that they need to move the case forward as quickly as possible.

And please, let's not bother talking about NAMA, court cases etc... For years now, REO's had terrible corporate governance, far too much leverage, and pretty much promised to totally fuck investors... And so it has come to pass, and shareholders don't even have a luxury Moroccan get - away to show for it...

When I began my intensive search for anything showing the «reposition global warming» memo in its full context, what I found in just the first day was essentially wall - to - wall quotes about Ross Gelbspan's big revelation of it to the world — except for one lone exception, which was a March 13, 2008 US News & World Report article noting phrase was part of Kivalina v Exxon court case documents (more on that separate problem here) which themselves led me to the New York Times revelation of the phrase and the ICE campaign, over six years earlier than any accolades about Gelbspan's exposé.

(That is, give out - of - court spoken testimony — see the «Discovery» discussion for more about this) In this case, the couple was able to settle after depositions showed their story was backed by the evidence.

A recent high - profile case about Crocs before the General Court of the European Union shows that those who wish to apply for design registration in the EU have to be on their guard.

You'd be forgiven for thinking that this was the case, because before making an application to court for a child arrangements or financial order you have to find a mediator and show that you have thought about mediation.

Rather than being about self - regulation, I see these cases as showing the importance of administrative law and the Charter to the Law Societies and the role of the courts with respect to Law Society decisions and with respect to the Charter.

According to court records in the case, the question was whether the trial court erred, even though the evidence tended to show the plaintiff, as a business invitee, knew about the dangerous condition on the floor.

People who watch TV shows about injury or accident cases sometimes feel that they can represent themselves in court.

While the Supreme Court has talked a good show about freedom of thought, its precedents say little about how the Amendment would apply to a case implicating free thought but not expression.

Official court statistics for 2006 show that the conviction to acquittal rate for all jury deliberated cases is just about 70 % to 30 %.

We have seen the Court of Appeal's rejection of the appeal in the case of British Airways and the employee wanting to wear a cross necklace in defiance of the company's dress code (Eweida v BA plc [2010] EWCA Civ 80, [2010] All ER (D) 144 (Feb)-RRB- and also that court's decision in the Buckland case which was widely reported in the press in terms of «Professor wins case about dumbing down university degrees» but which was of much greater legal significance for ridding the law on constructive dismissal of the heresy that the range of reasonable responses test applies to such dismissals, under which the ex-employee could only succeed in showing constructive dismissal if he could prove that the employer's behaviour was so bad that no reasonable employer could possibly have behaved in that way, ie that the employer had not just behaved as too much of an Alan (B'Stard) but as a grade one Olympic standard Alan (Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] EWCA Civ 121, [2010] All ER (D) 299 (Feb)-Court of Appeal's rejection of the appeal in the case of British Airways and the employee wanting to wear a cross necklace in defiance of the company's dress code (Eweida v BA plc [2010] EWCA Civ 80, [2010] All ER (D) 144 (Feb)-RRB- and also that court's decision in the Buckland case which was widely reported in the press in terms of «Professor wins case about dumbing down university degrees» but which was of much greater legal significance for ridding the law on constructive dismissal of the heresy that the range of reasonable responses test applies to such dismissals, under which the ex-employee could only succeed in showing constructive dismissal if he could prove that the employer's behaviour was so bad that no reasonable employer could possibly have behaved in that way, ie that the employer had not just behaved as too much of an Alan (B'Stard) but as a grade one Olympic standard Alan (Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] EWCA Civ 121, [2010] All ER (D) 299 (Feb)-court's decision in the Buckland case which was widely reported in the press in terms of «Professor wins case about dumbing down university degrees» but which was of much greater legal significance for ridding the law on constructive dismissal of the heresy that the range of reasonable responses test applies to such dismissals, under which the ex-employee could only succeed in showing constructive dismissal if he could prove that the employer's behaviour was so bad that no reasonable employer could possibly have behaved in that way, ie that the employer had not just behaved as too much of an Alan (B'Stard) but as a grade one Olympic standard Alan (Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] EWCA Civ 121, [2010] All ER (D) 299 (Feb)-RRB-.

His lordship would apply the principles in Allied Maple Group to the instant case as follows: the claimants had to show on the balance of probabilities that, had they received proper advice, they would have adopted a different negotiating stance, and, if they showed that, the court had to assess the chance of that bringing about a response from the Swedish companies that on the balance of probabilities the claimant would have accepted by way of settlement of the dispute.

Sir Igor Judge, President of the Queen's Bench Division, has defended court judges criticised for imposing «unduly lenient» sentences as newly released statistics showed sentences were increased in just over 100 out of about 80,000 cases dealt with by the crown court last year.

The key in such a case is to ensure your letter conveys the facts that are relevant to the cause of action, so you can show the judge, «See, they knew about the problem and refused to do anything about it, so I was forced to come to court.»

Custody Evaluations - What are they, what you need to look out for and how to combat bad evaluations Custody Agreements - Clauses you need to avoid conflict and not have to go back to court over and over Child Support - Learn how different states handle child support and what you can do to not be taken advantage of Restraining Orders - How to avoid them and deal with an unexpected restraining order False Allegations - Learn how to avoid false allegations and protect yourself when accused Parental Alienation - Recognize the signs and learn how to combat alienation Co-Parenting - Learn about co-parenting and if it will be possible in your situation Parallel Parenting - Parallel parenting can be implemented in high conflict custody situations Child Protective Services - Learn your rights when CPS shows up on your doorstep Domestic Violence - Allegations of domestic violence is often used in custody cases, learn how to protect yourself Contempt of Court - Denied visitation ricourt over and over Child Support - Learn how different states handle child support and what you can do to not be taken advantage of Restraining Orders - How to avoid them and deal with an unexpected restraining order False Allegations - Learn how to avoid false allegations and protect yourself when accused Parental Alienation - Recognize the signs and learn how to combat alienation Co-Parenting - Learn about co-parenting and if it will be possible in your situation Parallel Parenting - Parallel parenting can be implemented in high conflict custody situations Child Protective Services - Learn your rights when CPS shows up on your doorstep Domestic Violence - Allegations of domestic violence is often used in custody cases, learn how to protect yourself Contempt of Court - Denied visitation riCourt - Denied visitation rights?

«I'm always nervous about a presumption,» Townsend says, noting that if such a law is passed, parents who don't want a shared custody arrangement would have to bring evidence to show the court why it shouldn't apply in their case, and that could add to the cost of litigation.

There is a growing body of case law on parental alienation that shows that the courts are becoming ever more sophisticated about how to deal with the problem.