Sentences with phrase «show further thought»

Not exact matches

Further, the survey showed that most employees of small business believed the primary role of WorkSafe was to provide information and advice, which was double the proportion who thought its role was one of prosecuting breaches of safety standards.

While you might be thinking you'd love to work from home in your pajamas in front of the TV, the study goes on further to show that telecommuters put in longer hours and have more ambition.

Rush Limbaugh is so far from Christian it is difficult for me to believe that anyone would think that listening to his show would do any good for their soul.

This is our reality: All day long God is reaching into our condition, sending certain thoughts and desires, arousing certain emotions and calming unhealthy patterns, calling us further towards love / life, showing us that he is to be experienced in every piece of His creation and known in every ordinary fraction - of - a-second.

Prime Minister David Cameron said: «I think we will be able to show - if we can secure what's in this document, finish off the details and improve it still further - that on balance Britain is better off, more secure, more prosperous, has a better chance of success for all of our families and all our people inside this reformed European Union.

The fact that so many of the posters here think that Obama is a Muslim just shows how ignorant far too many Republicans and other right - wingers are.

It would have been a far better article, showing some self awareness and critical thinking, if TJ had looked at parallels between then and now.

I did consider telling you who I got the email from, but since they haven't shown up here yet (as far as I can tell), I don't think it would be appropriate to drag him into the conversation unwillingly.

I think of the book of Hebrews, where the author is intent to show that Jesus Christ is far superior to anything which was offered under the Mosaic Law, and after we have Jesus, to go back to such things is sheer folly.

As for failure to show that God exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just what kind of «evidence» are you looking for, and just how long do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?

I mention this not to ridicule Whitehead for his ignorance of Aristotle — nothing could be farther from my mind - but to show how in his own thought a Platonic cosmology may be seen, in the pages of Process and Reality, turning into an Aristotelian» (IN 170).

And I then heard students respond positively, even as the professor was showing how far Mullins departed from what classic Christianity thought its God - talk had been about.

While some praised the Netflix show for its daring depiction of mental health struggles and substance abuse issues, others thought it went too far, was unfair to its subjects and even damaging toward its viewers.

As far as I have been able to determine this is the first fully warranted solution which is able to show how the consequent nature can be prehended.1 I must confess that prior to her essay I really did not think it would be possible.2

As Professor Hartshorne has brilliantly shown, the consequences of this analysis for our thought of God's relationship to the world are far - reaching.

Taking advantage of recently recovered liturgies, architectural discoveries, and artistic reassessments, Stephen Shoemaker has encapsulated decades of research into a book that finally shows Mary to be far more present in the foundational years of Christianity than we had thought, well before the Council of Ephesus that confirmed her as Theotokos.

Thus far in this part of our discussion I have been trying to show that Paul's thinking about the work of Christ is predominantly eschatological: In virtue of an obedience which man, who stood simply in the succession of Adam, could not give, and of a victory which man could not win, the human situation has been radically transformed.

The whole thing rests upon one author — Michael Prescott's — highly selective excerpting and chopping up of a private [i.e., thinking out loud without clarifications] journal written when Rand was barely out of her teens, fresh from the blood bath of 1920s Soviet Russia — and still made it very clear that her read on the personalities of the observers showed that they were not appalled by Hickman's crime — she said there had been far worse, without the same spectacle of glee — but by his flamboyant and mocking defiance of society.

But whether and how this may be thought can be shown only by further discussion.

Paul shows me, I think, what the prophet has in mind about «seeking the Lord while he is near,» for the interests of my neighbor are always near: But like the prophet and parable, he also reveals how far these thoughts are from being mine.

As far as the prayer breakfast comment goes, I think Obama was just showing that he too could play the Christian game (tedious as it is)

Although they cite the Baptist theologian Timothy George in a way that shows his awareness of the ground - breaking work of the World Conference on Faith and Order at Montreal in 1963 on «Scripture, Tradition, and traditions,» Noll and Nystrom make no systematic use of his insights; they also neglect to note the phraseology of Pope John Paul II when he called for further study on «the relationship between Sacred Scripture as the highest authority in matters of faith and Sacred Tradition as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God» (Ut Unum Sint, 79)» a formulation that I think may hold the best promise of resolving the question since the sixteenth century.

I loved the part in the movie «Galaxy Quest» where the far - away space aliens received the transmissions of a Star Trek - like TV show... thought it was real and that the characters were gods who could save them from anything.

Having got himself so well launched, Whitehead now goes on to try and distinguish (actually not very well, since he is bound by his own work with Russell in writing Principia Mathematica) between what thought asserts that the world is like, and what sense - awareness shows it to be like, and I think he has far too narrow a notion of thought.

When people think they can, the result is well intentioned but ridiculous explanations that only show how far we are from really understanding these things.

That is, far from thinking of friendship as grounded simply in utility, they pointed to the mutual helpfulness of friends in order to show what a wonderful bond it was.

It was shown by far funnier means, I think.

I think this kind of thinking is what we should embrace for all ages (no need to sit in the corner and pout with meals that are far less than stellar), and I think meals that make others take notice are easily achievable — as you've shown!

I think that this premium might end up becoming further enticing to a new or unintended target of Chinese consumers that enjoys making large ticket purchases at the aim of being a status symbol or «showing off» their wealth.

«We are so far away from the U.S., and so far to think that playing with the best players in the world is possible — now I want to show them that it is.»

I think we all have a bunch in common, and love shooting the shit here on FTF, that just goes to show how far things have fallen when we willingly step away

«If you think Trevor Francis was the first guy for # 1m [in 1979] and it looked unreasonable, it shows you how far football has come, beyond calculation and rationality.

And while Wenger may have been forgiven for thinking that the performance of his midfield star Mesut Ozil at Villa Park would have vindicated him, a Metro report shows that some fans have taken it as further proof of his poor managerial skills.

All four of them have obviously struggled at different points throughout the Season, but I really do think that the talent in each case is far greater than the win / loss record would show.

Do you not think though, as some including me, surely do, that over these six games he has shown far more discilpline and maturity in his play?

The Spuds victory has done us a favour really as the top of the table has become a bit closer for us, and has shown that Pep Guardiola's side is not as invincible as people thought they were so far.

Ozil reminds me alot of Berbatov — ghosts around, has moments of brilliance and sometime very frustrating, doesn't seem to play with any fire in his belly, i was very disappointed in him today, but on the plus side i thought Wilshere and Sanchez were excellent and Welbeck showed som encouraging moments and i thought our attack looked as dangerous as we have this season so far!

We could have been up front... it goes to show that we are not too far but need to add quality and Wenger needs to stop thinking that he will uncover that gem for under the market price that will lead us all the way with WC quality they don't all turn out that way.

I think this season so far has shown that we maybe have 2 world class players and the rest are just good premiership players and as a whole we aren't as good as we sometimes think we are.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

I don't think any team at the moment are far and away superior at the moment, unless it's shown City's defeat was a one - off.

Wenger is getting worse, those big defeats last year, the fact that we as fans weren't thinking of a win at the Chelsea game but hoping for a small defeat shows just how far off the pace Wenger is.

i can, t believe that this post had been allowed to be posted on this site!anyone connected with arsenal does know that despite his flaws and he has a few WENGER does what he thinks is best for the club, fans and aslo thinks he is still the right man to lead us something im sure many will disagree with but to go as far as calling him an old man, deluded, a sorry excuse of a manager, calling for him to be booted out of the club and not be allowed near it again is out of order, and also shows how clueless & ignorant you are!!

Further, we're bottom of our CL group, with extremely poor results against Zagreb and Olympiakos, so the fact many fans think the AKB has been vindicated shows only how low their standards and expectations are.

talk about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I don't think Vlade is an idiot, don't hate the guy, just think he shouldn't have a job as a GM because I don't see anything so far that shows he has a great eye for talent.

I thought he showed a lot of improvement when he returned last season, and so far from what I've seen he's been a prominent figure in our attack, created a lot of our better chances and seems a lot more intent on making things happen.

However, I think T.O.'s emotional outbursts were far more negative than anything Dez ever showed.