Quick
show of hands if you're into the idea of Vince Vaughn, one of Hollywood's most charming and funny leading men, taking a hard right turn into Hillbilly Elegy territory.
When I give talks since the book has come out I ask people, you know, by
show of hands if they've seen or read Cymbeline.
Not exact matches
So
if voting isn't meant to break a tie, what's the purpose
of getting a
show of hands on an issue that's holding up your meeting?
According to notices from the New York State Board
of Law Examiners and the Colorado Supreme Court, users who
show up with a Touch Bar - equipped model in those states will have to write their answers by
hand, but they will be allowed to re-download the ExamSoft software to another machine for free
if they do it in advance.
And here again he
showed more
of his
hand — once again refusing to confirm
if Facebook will implement «the exact same regulation» for North American users, as some consumer groups have been calling for it to.
Though Buffett doesn't easily
show his
hand regarding individual purchases or the details
of his calculations, he has always been very clear about what drives his assessment
of value: stocks should be valued as
if you were purchasing the whole business.
We, on the other
hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events
of the past few days
show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule
of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated wealth
of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip
of a switch
if things go wrong in the process obliterating the welfare
of billions (
of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.
I'll tell you what...
if Copperfield (or anyone else) can publicly die at the
hands of impartial (i.e. they don't care who their victim is) professional executioners and then come back to life —
showing his injuries, allowing any doubter, named Thomas or otherwise, to place his or her
hand in the wounds, then you've got something other than «parlor tricks.»
The mythical friend Gabriel was the mythical friend
of Jesus the Messaih accompanying him all time as per the Quran readings... this mythical friend is the right
hand for God and was sent to nearly all messengers
of God to deliver teachings from God to his messengers and Gabriel is the only Angel that has minimum number
of wings reaching the sixth heaven as a limit... as per my readings and narrow knowledge... Reality you are playin with fire here
show respect even
if you are agnostic about all as you are only human and do not know the unknown
of see the unseen or touch the untouched or feel the unfelt because even when you are alone you are not alone.
Some time fears and acts
of fears leads people to what you fear most to happen... so it is how it will be played that will determine the future... so as BO said that to
show good feelings and give a helping
hand will make you less enemies than
if go on the bases
of power and superiority...
On the other
hand,
if the pluralism is simply an ad hoc collection
of exegetical tools, then, for all their several excellencies, these essays do not
show much
of anything about whether there is a useable process hermeneutics.
On the other
hand, his adult life
shows a commitment not to a transferable Anglican «ideal» — as
if one could live as an Anglican while belonging to a Baptist, Methodist, or Presbyterian church — but to the concrete life
of, first, the Church
of England and then, subsequent to his relocation, to the Anglican Church
of Canada.
If 50,000
showed up, how long would it take for all
of them to feel the prints
of the nails in his
hands and feet and the wound in his side?
I think most
of the Americans are in lost... as most
of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even
if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside
of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like
if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite...
if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front
of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending
of both
hand... some
of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll
shows a huge number
of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name
of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure
of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave
of material things...
If, on the other
hand, the assertion is construed subjectively, as asserting that God is the eminent subject
of experience, because the only individual who experiences all things as their primal source and final end, it, too, can be
shown to be true necessarily, although neither literally nor analogically, but only symbolically, on the understanding that it is nevertheless really and not merely apparently true, because its implications can all be interpreted in the concepts and assertions
of a transcendental metaphysics, whose application to God, as to anything else, is strictly literal.
Deniers, as both Lipstadt and Vidal - Naquet
show, seem to have an endless supply
of polemical tricks and dodges: they simply discount Jewish testimony out
of hand as lie or fantasy; inculpatory testimony from the Nazis themselves is said to have been coerced by the triumphant Allies; documents confirming such testimony are said to be forgeries; Nazi statements and memoranda about the Final Solution are taken at face value
if they are euphemistically phrased, but are interpreted as hyperbolic or figurative
if they are blunt and explicit; photographs and films
of executions are dismissed as fakes.
If, on the one
hand, this assertion is construed objectively, as asserting that God is the eminent object
of experience, because the only individual other than ourselves whom we experience directly and universally, it can be
shown to be true both literally and necessarily, on the understanding that such immediate experience
of God can become knowledge
of God, or even experience
of God as God, only through the mediation
of concepts and terms.
One can visit a lot
of national monuments after hours: no crowds, no tourist trams, no hawkers, plus I could try my
hand at night photography (hope you don't mind
if I
show a couple results, dedicated to Lincoln and King).
«When two men are fighting and the wife
of one
of them intervenes to drag her husband clear
of his opponent,
if she puts out her
hand and catches hold
of the man by his privates, you must cut off her
hand and
show her no mercy.»
Here agrarians join
hands with the ecologists who have
shown us that interdependence, even
if its nature is not fully understood, is the law
of life.
On the other
hand, the polls
show that most people still think abortion is wrong, and, as Lincoln said
of slavery, «Like every other wrong which some men will commit
if left alone, it ought to be prohibited by law.»
Studies
of brainwashing have
shown that
if a person can be made to feel frightened or guilty enough, he becomes putty in an authority figure's
hands.
If he; s running the show then he's got a hand in all the «natural» terminations and miscariages; what if abortions are just another of his tool
If he; s running the
show then he's got a
hand in all the «natural» terminations and miscariages; what
if abortions are just another of his tool
if abortions are just another
of his tools?
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock
of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of GOD
if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy
of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment
if that country provide these things because
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk
of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying
hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to
show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest
of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of all.Love for GOD and man.
If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans
of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.
If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care
if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work
of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the KINGDOM
OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
OF GOD.
If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.
If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and
if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
If two men, a man and his countryman, are struggling together, and the wife
of one comes near to deliver her husband from the
hand of the one who is striking him, and puts out her
hand and seizes his genitals, then you shall cut off her
hand; you shall not
show pity.
On the other
hand,
if people envisage social reforms to take care
of the needy and marginalized, history
shows us that the actual implementation
of these enticing social visions has also led to massive sufferings for other innocent people.
Agreed: «don't let the left
hand know what the right
hand is doing...» Those who «
show» their faith, whether through their profession (Pastor, Missionary) or pious works (church board, conference speaker), can only be assessed as more sincere
if there is evidence they were religious / pious / faithful when no one was looking (Pope John Paul II never confirmed this, but as a young priest, it was reported he worked in the Polish underground to save many Jewish children from the Nazi's, years later, he was visiting Israel and a woman who claimed he was the priest who saved her from the Nazis stepped forward to meet him, he blessed her, yet never did confirm or deny
if he had played the part
of a hero).
Scriptural references to these sexual practices, both before and after Leviticus,
show God's displeasure with them whether or not any ceremony or idolatry is involved.Response # 2: Despite the UFMCC's contention that the word for abomination (toevah) is usually associated with idolatry, it in fact appears in Proverbs 6:16 - 19 in connection with sins having nothing to do with idolatry or pagan ceremony: There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable [an abomination or toevah] to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue,
hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.Idolatry plays no part in these scriptures; clearly, then, toevah is not limited to idolatrous practices.Response # 3:
If the practices in Leviticus 18 and 20 are condemned only because of their association with idolatry, then it logically follows they would be permissible if they were committed apart from idolatr
If the practices in Leviticus 18 and 20 are condemned only because
of their association with idolatry, then it logically follows they would be permissible
if they were committed apart from idolatr
if they were committed apart from idolatry.
If this is the case (and this has been expounded in the foregoing, where it was
shown that the immediate contemporaneity is merely an occasion, but not in the sense that the condition was presupposed as already present), what becomes
of the problem
of the disciple at second
hand?
But it wasn't as
if the skies opened up or a chorus
of angels started singing when they shook
hands, which just goes to
show that when you meet your hockey soul mate, it doesn't always leave an impression.
because from where I am sitting it looks like Vardy is doubting
if he wants to join us and Arsenal has
showed their
hand and lost control
of the process.
If we show an interest, he may well hand in some sort of request if he really is unhappy.
If we
show an interest, he may well
hand in some sort
of request
if he really is unhappy.
if he really is unhappy...
If he can re-find those killer balls he used to have he can really add a lot... I really don't mind if people still think we should sell Wilshere... Wenger pretty emphatically turned any notion of the sale down when he said «we are no longer in a position where we have to sell our best players» which was a hands off warning as well as showing how highly he still rates hi
If he can re-find those killer balls he used to have he can really add a lot... I really don't mind
if people still think we should sell Wilshere... Wenger pretty emphatically turned any notion of the sale down when he said «we are no longer in a position where we have to sell our best players» which was a hands off warning as well as showing how highly he still rates hi
if people still think we should sell Wilshere... Wenger pretty emphatically turned any notion
of the sale down when he said «we are no longer in a position where we have to sell our best players» which was a
hands off warning as well as
showing how highly he still rates him.
This from Opta
shows just how much
of a task United have on their
hands if they're to catch their rivals Man City
Cutting the squad down for wage reasons is important but loans can cover partial wages and
if AFC
show the appearance
of not needing to sell
if they can loan then they have a stronger
hand in negotiations and asking for more for our players.
, i mean fans going out there to protest, no going for games, fans
showing the board we are arsenal fc no arsenal fbc (football banking corporation),
if wenger isn't doing well it in the
hands of the board to tell him, don't you think something is fishy, don't you think they tell wenger what to do in order to keep his fat paycheck, damn, those Americans are gonna eat our club dry, Americans out!!!! Thumbs up board out, thumb down wenger out
Regardless
of what Juventus offer at the moment, I'm sure Arsenal are likely to
show them the
hand; however
if it becomes clear that Alexis has no intention
of signing a new deal, then much like the RVP case, it would probably be better to sell with a year left, rather than risk losing him for free next year.
Naturally, the Merseyside giants and Jurgen Klopp will be desperate to keep hold
of him as he has
shown real improvements and development over the last year or so, but it may well be out
of their
hands if they can't get him to agree to a new contract.
The Gunners have a big job on their
hands but the return
of Alexis Sanchez should be enough for them to
show their overall quality, even
if Spurs run them pretty close.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo...
if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better
show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see
if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind,
if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the
hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even
if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable
if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
They may have won the battle but the war is in the
hands of the fans, and sorry to say looking at the stress
of Europa and nothing to
show transfer market (you did be damned
if you expecting a gud window... I just pray we don't lose Sanchez) another shambolic season is on the horizon....
Lemar is a bit
of a sticky wicket... we don't get him without letting Sanchez move on and how disturbing it would be
if we end up paying more for Lemar than we get for Alexis on the open market, especially since many
of predicted big spenders have already made some big money moves and / or
showed their
hands... don't get me wrong, the tape on Lemar is full
of hope but Sanchez he is not.
Again like the GMU / Florida game, the sharps have yet to
show their
hand but we expect a wave
of UCLA money closer to game time
if the tournament betting trends continue.
Now,
if the champions
of England want to gain the upper
hand in this race, it has been become quite evident that Conte needs to
show some patience and keep trying to get a move done, prior to deadline day.
United are in good
hands, the three trophies, two
of them major last season have
shown just what Mourinho has brought to the club over the past year and
if that success continues, United could be back on the road to glory, which is something we all want to see, especially to
show the ABU's (anyone but United brigade) that Manchester United are back and normal service has resumed.
The nurses & LCs were pretty good about helping with getting bfing started, they
showed me a variety
of ways to hold the baby,
hand express some milk onto the nipple to get her started (she didn't want to suck, although positioning was perfect & she'd suck on a finger
if it was put in her mouth) One nurse tried sugar water on my nipple, which I wasn't okay with, but it was the middle
of the night, I was overwhelmed and frustrated, and baby blues had set in.
There was also subtle pressure - the random older woman in a restaurant who asked me
if I would be breastfeeding; the infant care classes where formula feeding wasn't even mentioned; the nurse on my maternity ward tour who warned us that we'd be woken up every two hours to nurse, and asked for a
show of hands: how many in the group were going to be breastfeeding?
Also call your doctor
if your child
shows any
of the classic signs
of dehydration, including decreased urination, excessive sleepiness or fussiness, cool and discolored
hands and feet, or extreme thirst.
I try to always have a few
of these ingredients on
hand so I can quickly whip up some food
if my child is
showing an interest.
Right photo: Twist as
shown by grasping both sides
of the diaper at the same time, left
hand palm up, right
hand palm down (opposite
if you're left
handed).