Not exact matches
Even just a cursory Internet search
shows that breastfeeding promotion materials framed in terms of «the
risks of formula feeding» are currently being used by some state breastfeeding coalitions, two hospitals, two private corporations, the Departments of Public
Health in California and New York, the City of New York, as well as The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) programs in at least five states... The United States Department of
Health and
Human Services» Office on Women's
Health publishes a 50 - page guide
to breastfeeding that points out that «among formula - fed babies, ear infections and diarrhea are more common».
Epidemiologic research
shows that
human milk and breastfeeding of infants provide advantages with regard
to general
health, growth, and development, while significantly decreasing
risk for a large number of acute and chronic diseases.
Just as research has
shown that smoking has a serious negative effect on
health and the world's
health organizations now strongly recommend against it, not breastfeeding has been
shown to have definite
health risks and consequences, and breastfeeding is now clearly understood
to be the normal way
to feed a
human baby.
A growing number of
human studies suggest that a low plasma Aβ42 / Aβ40 ratio is a
risk factor for major depression, 45, 46 dementia47 and higher mortality.48 The Framingham Study also
showed that increased plasma Aβ42: Aβ40 ratios are associated with decreased
risk of AD and dementia.13 Thus, the higher Aβ42 / Aβ40 ratio observed in regular meditators at baseline and the increase in this ratio from pre -
to post intervention in the novice meditator and vacation groups may be salutary
to brain
health.
Kennel Cough was once thought
to not be a
human health risk, but recent studies
show that one of the agents that causes it, Bordetella bronchiseptica, may cause disease in people with compromised immune systems and young children.
Like other foods containing allicin, chives have been
shown to protect heart
health in
humans and some other animals; they may be able
to help reduce bad cholesterol levels, which can directly lower heart disease
risk.
Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
show that cats are rarely a source of disease, and that it is unlikely for anyone
to get sick from touching or owning a cat.3 «Feral cats pose even less
risk to public
health than pet cats because they have minimal
human contact, and any contact that does occur is almost always initiated by the person,» says Ackerman.
False Statement: «Science
Shows Feral Cat Colonies Pose No Disease
Risk to Humans — The
health risks that catch and kill advocates most often blame on cats are intestinal parasites, rabies, flea - borne typhus, and toxoplasmosis.
The studies, which covered all areas of concern, have «not
shown any new
risks to human health or the environment, beyond the usual uncertainties of conventional plant breeding.
Perchlorate is well - known
to pose
risks for both
human health and wildlife and has been
shown to arise from many natural and anthropogenic sources, including ammonium perchlorate and lightning discharges.
Triclosan and triclocarban are common additions
to liquid hand soaps and a wide range of skin care products and are supposed
to perform antibacterial functions, but CELA's study in the Great Lakes region has
shown that they pose serious
risks to the environment and
to human health.