Sentences with phrase «show warming rates»

New analyses of balloon - borne and satellite measurements of lower - and mid-tropospheric temperature show warming rates that are similar to those of the surface temperature record and are consistent within their respective uncertainties, largely reconciling a discrepancy noted in the TAR.

Second, as pointed out above, the problems with the satellite data have been adjusted and now «show warming rates that are similar to those of the surface temperature record and are consistent within their respective uncertainties»

The latest 25 - year period shows a warming rate of 0.177 °C per decade versus the a rate of only 0.045 °C per decade over the 150 - year period.

I've simply shown the warming rate presented by the data and half of that warming rate.

Not exact matches

Moving on to the latest employment report, released Friday, that showed a slight decrease in the unemployment rate widely attributed to a drop in the number of individuals looking for work, Gundlach said it was a bleed - off of the temporary increase in employment due to unseasonably warm weather.

David Rendel, the former Lib Dem MP, received warm applause when he told delegates he would be in favour of keeping the 50p top rate of tax even if it were shown that it raised no revenue for the Treasury.

But new models show that at the current rates of greenhouse gas emissions, warming seas will push these foraging grounds much farther south.

The first predications of coastal sea level with warming of two degrees by 2040 show an average rate of increase three times higher than the 20th century rate of sea level rise.

They showed that when these cells experience warmer temperatures and get more nutrients they can double or triple their cell division rates, allowing them to potentially bloom into a large population fairly quickly at sea.

«Warming in the Andes is occurring at a rate nearly twice the global average and it's already impacting water resources as shown in this research.

Complementary analyses of the surface mass balance of Greenland (Tedesco et al, 2011) also show that 2010 was a record year for melt area extent... Extrapolating these melt rates forward to 2050, «the cumulative loss could raise sea level by 15 cm by 2050 ″ for a total of 32 cm (adding in 8 cm from glacial ice caps and 9 cm from thermal expansion)- a number very close to the best estimate of Vermeer & Rahmstorf (2009), derived by linking the observed rate of sea level rise to the observed warming.

The results, presented here at the AAAS annual meeting on 14 February, showed that when the sea surface warmed off the coast of Peru in 1997 - 98, during El Niño, there was a marked increase in rates of cholera infection in Lima and nearby cities.

Recent studies have shown that the Arctic is warming at around twice the rate as the rest of the world, with permafrost already starting to thaw across large areas.

For global observations since the late 1950s, the most recent versions of all available data sets show that the troposphere has warmed at a slightly greater rate than the surface, while the stratosphere has cooled markedly since 1979.

Above the surface, global observations since the late 1950s show that the troposphere (up to about 10 km) has warmed at a slightly greater rate than the surface, while the stratosphere (about 10 — 30 km) has cooled markedly since 1979.

Fu himself adjusted his methodology in response /» rebuttal» and showed results much closer to those of Christy and Spencer in a subsequent publication (although Christy and Spencer still think there are errors in the methodology) and still lower than surface warming rates.

I'd say a warming trend showing - up in one set of data no later than 1850 (significant enough to cause measurably increase rates of glacier melt) vs a warming trend not showing - up in another set of data until later than 1900 is a conflict that is well beyond a «bit silly.»

Climate models show that the rate of warming is consistent with expectations (5).

This approach allowed them to compare the rate and distribution of warming predicted by models with those shown in observations.

The blue area shows the rate of ocean warming.

The 11 - year (132 - month) running mean temperature (Fig. 3b) shows only a moderate decline of the warming rate.

The scientists concluded in the paper that their findings, combined with projected ongoing warming, show that even if rates of climate pollution are reigned in, that «may not be sufficient to avoid significant impacts» of acidification on coral reef regeneration.

Research has shown that what you need pre-exercise is a warm - up that gets your heart rate up, sending blood to the muscles you will use in your workout.

Dr. Amy Muise *, a social psychologist, revealed a study that showed offering a hot cup of coffee as opposed to an iced - coffee to someone, positively influenced the opinion of the receiver of the beverage... the person who was offered something warm (soup, a beverage, whatever) rated the person who offered the warmth as more «friendly» and «trustworthy» as opposed to the participants who were offered something cold.

In contrast, mid latitude glaciers, such as the South Cascade Glacier shown in the photos is very warm (ice temperature is about zero celcius all year round), and snowfall rates are also high.

I'd say a warming trend showing - up in one set of data no later than 1850 (significant enough to cause measurably increase rates of glacier melt) vs a warming trend not showing - up in another set of data until later than 1900 is a conflict that is well beyond a «bit silly.»

# 46 ZH I am merely pointing out that your commentary on the temperature record points out that 2010 is not significantly warmer and is not an unamgiguous new record in the last decade, whereas the Foster and Rahmstorf while admitting their analysis shows «no sign of a change in the warming rate during the period of common coverage»

Some models actually show a slight cooling of the southern oceans for a while, and all show it not keeping up with the rate at which the waters to the north warm — for a somewhat longer period of time.

An analysis of GISS global tempertures shows an increase of the linear rate of warming since 1980 up to 2007 (see red trace on graphic here — usually 2 clicks to download your attachment) which strongly suggests a global slowdown can not have begin before that time.

But the sheer rate of increase over just the past 55 years shows how fast global warming could hit us in the future — and the present — and underscores how much we've failed as a planet to slow down carbon emissions.

While RealClimate has called into question the soundness of the paper's quite narrow conclusions of discrepancy between model predictions and measurements of the relative rate of warming of different levels of the atmosphere over the tropics, this paper is being touted by the deniers as showing that the models are wrong to predict any warming at all, and that predictions of future warming and climate change can be entirely discounted.

Connolley and Bracegirdle (2007) show that expected trends in a much larger sample of models are very varied (though the ensemble mean warms at about the rate seen in the Steig et al paper).

Since the satellites now clearly show that the atmosphere is warming at around the rate predicted by the models, we will report on his no - doubt imminent proclamation of a new found faith in models as soon as we hear of it...

I agree that our paper did give the impression of weaker warming on the Peninsula, and I agree that the rate of warming there shown by O'Donnell — one of the fastest rates of warming anywhere on the planet — is almost certainly more accurate.

Yet O'Donnell et al.'s results — if correct — suggest that is is warming quite fast at the surface there; at the rate they show, we could be seeing significant summer melting in that region within a few decades.

Climate models show that the rate of warming is consistent with expectations (5).

Our own (as yet unpublished — so you don't need to believe me) simulations also show NH oceans warming at a slightly faster rate than the SH including all of the forcings we have discussed.

In 1990 this key cause of global warming was rising at a rate of 1 ppm; by 1998 it was increasing by 2ppm; and by 2003 instruments at Mount Zeppelin showed it was growing by 3ppm.

At any rate, the GISS dataset * shows 2007 was second - warmest on record.

3) the Antarctic (with the notable exception of the West Antarctic peninsula) shows low rates of warming, whereas the high Arctic is the most rapidly warming part of the planet --

However, while most «skeptics» agree we are in a warming trend, for most, the main challenges are (i) that it is not shown to be at unprecedented levels or rates (for the last millenium or so) and (ii) that it is not shown to be principally manmade.

That said, the independent ocean and land data show roughly consistent warming rates.

Not really, the paleo has never shown warming at the rate we are currently experiencing.

(Tamino, 2009) clearly shows that surface temperatures north of latitude 60o are warming at an accelerated rate in the past few decades.

Computer model simulations tend to capture the slow rate of warming in the western Pacific over the last few decades, but they show the warm pool heating rapidly in the future.

But the current paper shows that the differences in midcentury warming rates occurred much more rapidly than previously thought (over a few years, not a few decades).

Computer simulations of the atmosphere and ocean, when run with rising greenhouse gases, show the warm pool heating at the same rate as other ocean regions, in contrast to what has been observed there so far, the researchers said.

Yet that dataset, which, like all the surface datasets, was recently adjusted to deliver the global warming that measurements did not show, now indicates a warming trend over those same eight years at a rate equivalent to more than 1.5 degrees / century.

But that's unphysical: basic physics show that the anthropogenic warming rate should be higher after 1950.

University of Alabama - Huntsville climate scientists John Christy and Richard McNider found that by removing the climate effects of volcanic eruptions early on in the satellite temperature record showed virtually no change in the rate of warming since the early 1990s.