Sentences with phrase «showing animals of»

She spent her childhood involved in 4 - H, showing animals of all types from horses and pigs to dogs and poultry.

The purpose was to encourage and cooperate with the numerous exhibitors and breeders endeavoring to keep the Springer a hunting dog as well as a show animal of good conformation.

Not exact matches

The show, which takes place in a world in which animals are interchangeable with humans, tells the story of a talking horse, BoJack, who used to have a sitcom and now lives a pathetic life in Los Angeles.

They will also have to show proof of the animal's health and up - to - date vaccinations 48 hours in advance.

«Tonight,» says Leah Nathan, a friend of Petersan's from the animal protection community, «we showed everyone veganism is not just about weirdo food.»

The company showed different versions of the same commercial featuring various animals.

What better way to show you where to sit at your next business meeting than through the chaos of an animal photo shoot?

The animal - welfare standards, along with the company's sustainable - seafood policy (it sells no fish at low levels of abundance), Responsibly Grown ratings, and decision to become the first national grocery chain to label whether products contain genetically modified organisms, all show a bit of Mackey's libertarian streak.

No allergic reactions were reported, and unlike other recent meat recalls, neither type of hot dog was shown to contain horse, mule, donkey, pony, unicorn, or any other four - legged animal that wasn't listed on the label.

Beginning March 1, the airline will require customers seeking to travel with a pet to provide additional documents that show the passenger's need for a support animal as well as proof of the animal's training and vaccinations 48 hours prior to the flight.

«When you place animals in an alien environment, they show signs of stress.

He also states, «While history clearly shows that... government meddling in monetary affairs... leads to financial market booms and the inevitable busts that follow, mainstream economists either deny that financial bubbles can occur or claim that the «animal spirits» of market participants are to blame.»

[2] Quotes out of context, which is a ploy used by the less able [3] Shows a marked desire to escape moral accountability and [4] Relegates man to animal status

Even if we accept that all of the animals were vegetarian (show me a vegetarian frog or snake...), the amount of food to feed them for a year would be absolutely massive.

I disagree «humanity» by and large are caring, compassionate, social animals and when they act this way they are healthy and happy, but the media and other sources continue to show us the worst side of people thus making the impression that we are mean and hateful.

There are even studies with pre-verbal children (haven't been socialized to religion yet) and other but non-human social animals that show that morality, if you accept that a sense of fairness and preferring «nice» over the opposite are proto - morals, then indeed it is evolution that makes it so.

New research shows that humpback whales are basically the ocean's superheroes, regularly intervening on behalf of other animals to protect them from killer whales.

The Culture We Deserve by jacques barzun university press of new england, 185 pages, $ 19.95 «I have got materials toward a treatise,» Jonathan Swift wrote to Alexander Pope in September 1725, «proving the falsity of that definition of animal rationale, and to show it would be only rationis....

Here's the rest of it:»... Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.

His homegrown, Americana brand of folk recalls greats like Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen, but on 2006's The Animal Year's, Ritter showed that he is in different class than the «70s ballad writers.

There is no scientific evidence that man evolved from animals, and all the evidence we have shows that the idea of evolution is not true.

The point is that evolution shows we have a common origin with the rest of the animal kingdom.

Ernst Cassirer in his Essay on Man designates man as «animal symbolicum,» and shows that all of the typically human functions stem from this fundamental ability to formulate and communicate meanings.

Then, because God had already shown them the «right» way, He pulled Cain up on his «non-blood» vegetable offering as not doing what is «right», as it wasn't shedding the blood of an animal (which was essentially a type and shadow of Christ's sacrifice, as well as being the pattern already set by God in front of Adam and Eve in the Garden).

Second: modern biology shows there to be an extraordinary similarity between the biochemistry and physiology of all animals.

It is often taught that after the first sin was committed, God wanted to show Adam and Eve that sin has consequences, and so He slew an animal in front of them, and made clothes for them from the hide of the dead animal.

In 1555 an early French zoologist, called Belon, showed from the comparison of the skeletons of a bird and a man that there was such a remarkable similarity, that man carried about in his own body the proof of his connection with the animals.

For animals too say men wrote it shows zero understanding of anything above animal.

In the Pleistocene period over 100 species of large animals disappeared, probably, as Paul Martin has shown, because of wasteful hunting methods.

And as for the origin of species and evolution in terms of the scientific method, that scientific method has given us the ability to decode the DNA genome of many animals, and to show where, back in time, the various relatives of man and modern apes, for example, branched off into separate species.

What God is looking for is repentence and a turning to him rather than a turning away from him.God instituted the animal sacrifices to show just how bad sin was so we would be sorry that we greived him.For us to be made right there has to be a choice to turn from sin and follow him and out of that decision there should be a desire to walk in his ways.Under the old law part of that obedience was to make offerings however it was by faith in God that made the person righteous and not the blood of animals.

Even though it does not describe vividly in Genesis 3 about God required sacrifice to replace Adam and Eve sin, but God showed Adam and Eve how to replace them as the one who should die because of their sin, by killing an animal and make the clothes for them.

The lower animals are not demonstrably righteous or wicked, but they too can be bored or the opposite, they show signs of experiencing conflicts or harmonies of their feelings or impulses.

Wellhausen, Kraus, Rowley and other Old Testament scholars have shown that the flesh of animals was not intended to be eaten, but to be, first, a sacrifice to God.

Unfortunately, as a former Christian, well acquainted with sin and confession and the whole bloody business of sacrifice to appease Someone who thinks that shows «love,» I question the whole ancient story, all the animals killed, all the trees cut down (for temples and churches and crosses and «holy books») and all the human beings left to feel separated again and again from the universe, Nature, each other and their «gods.»

Its experience of the extent to which human brutality can go, of the fury that can be unleashed when the human animal is attacked, its acceptance in wry cynicism of the venality of great and small; its acceptance, too, of a psychological analysis that tends to show how slight the power of reason, how great the strength of obscure passions; how corrupting of children the possible love of mothers and the wrath of fathers; its portrayal of men and mankind in bitterly disillusioned novels and in shuddering chronicles of man's inhumanity to man — in all this the 20th century has perhaps gone beyond anything that Edwards said in dispraise of men, individually and in the collective.

Animal control showed up and took care of the snake at the firm, but that's just one snake.

Experiments in animal cells have shown that although these genes are required to form pluripotent stem cells during development, they are not powerful enough on their own to overcome the epigenetic programming of a mature cell and convert it to a pluripotent stem cell directly.

Speaking of 8th grade, do you know that carbon dating of archeological finds show that animals have existed millions of years as opposed the Bible version of a few thousand?

By naming the animals Adam shows his power over them and puts them in their place within the order of Creation.

The fossil record shows without a shadow of a doubt there were transitions between primitive animals to present animals and the evidence keeps mounting, so there's no faith involved, but cold hard facts.

There is no such «direct» evolution: animals, bacteria, and algae have a common ancestor from which they have diverged, as can be shown by aligning and comparing amino acid sequences of proteins and nucleotide sequences of homologous ribosomal RNA molecules that are found in both bacteria and vertebrates.

Domestic and farm animals of course do show affections even sympathy towards their masters, owners / farmers.

To show how tyrannical any country that aimed at achieving perfect justice — even at the expense of family, friendship, and the self - consciousness of persons born to love other persons and die as particular persons — would be, Socrates turned the rulers into gods and most people into animals to be controlled.

The bones are the earliest found that show signs of the animal having been a «load bearing» animal, a sign of domestication.

The empirical appearances of outward shape and form and of biological mode of life may show such very gradual transitions between animal and man, that in this respect it may perhaps not be possible at all to succeed in indicating concretely and unmistakably, where the dividing line runs between animal and man.

Also the media will usually show this as a clash of Sikhs and make it seem like we are all animals when in fact it is the just fighting back the radicals, so again the media plays to the unfounded fears of the public about Sikhs.

Animals can respond to a spiritual presence, too, whether showing fright in the presence of evil, or becoming docile and peaceful in the presence of holiness.

This excitement shows him a new side of himself — the power side, the animal side, the side that moves vigorously into contact — and he begins to realize something of what he has been missing in life.

The writer is on the trail of something that shows itself at the level of torpid intelligence, loss of purpose, and the decay of common animal decency.