Sentences with phrase «showing current warming»

In fact, most climate specialists now agree that actual observations from both weather satellites and balloon - borne radiosondes show no current warming whatsoever.»

TJA claims [wrongly] «There is no study [except maybe THIS ONE and also THIS ONE] that shows the current warming is unprecedented in the past 1500 years.»

In fact, most climate specialists now agree that actual observations from both weather satellites and balloon - borne radiosondes show no current warming whatsoever — in direct contradiction to computer model results.»

By implication, the comforting suggestion that Medieval warmth showed current warming to be nothing to worry about was also (if you will pardon the pun) «toast.»

The trend from 1680 was problematic for the IPCC because it showed the current warming was part of a longer natural trend.

Not exact matches

But new models show that at the current rates of greenhouse gas emissions, warming seas will push these foraging grounds much farther south.

However, in light of our substantiation of the effects of «grand solar minima» upon past global climates, it could be speculated that the current pausing of «Global Warming», which is frequently referenced by those sceptical of climate projections by the IPCC, might relate at least in part to a countervailing effect of reduced solar activity, as shown in the recent sunspot cycle.»

This image shows the path of the Kelvin waves that interact with the Antarctic Circumpolar Current and push warmer waters under the ice shelves of the West Antarctic Peninsula.

«The research shows that climate sensitivity was higher during the past global, warm climate than in the current climate.

«Our current observations show that plants in Concord today are leafing out earlier than in Thoreau's time in response to warm temperatures,» she said.

New research shows that the current drought plaguing the American West is likely the beginning of a new trend brought on by global warming.

Current models don't suggest that this factor will increase as the climate warms, but the new study shows that it has in recent years.

It will show Manhattan frozen solid after the warm ocean current known as the Gulf Stream shuts down.

A March study shows that one large swath of the ice sheet sits on beds as deep as 8,000 feet below sea level and is connected to warming ocean currents.

The application of gentle cooling and warming currents inside the ear canal can provide relief for migraine sufferers, new research at the University of Kent has helped show.

Professor Kug notes that further research is needed to obtain a general conclusion on the matter, but this research delivers important implications for climate adaptation because the analysis shows that if current warming trends continue, it is feasible to conclude that the ecosystems in regions affected by the anomalous climate will suffer greater damages due to the cold and dry spells.

The luke - warm success of their IPO reflects continued investor aversion to the shipping sector, which is now into the 6th year of its current downturn (but showing signs of recovery).

Jack Davidson — «love, mistake, promise, auto crack - up, color, petal» the current show at THEODORE: Art in Bushwick, is an exhibit of refreshingly warm and oddly humorous paintings that land on the minimalist side of the painterly spectrum, a paradoxical state of affairs.

The Approach has obligingly extended its wonderful Bill Lynch exhibition to 1 March so you can catch that, have a pub lunch downstairs with a glass of something to warm the cockles, then head over to Herald Street to see Laura Bartlett's current show.

And I've shown you evidence repeatedly, evidence indicating that there has been no long - term warming trend, evidence that the current spate of extreme weather events is nothing new.

As Manny is very aware, 1998 is the current record warmest year and a simple trend plotted from it to the present will always show a cooling trend... until the next record year.

In so far as M&M are trying to distort the climate data over the last 1000 years to show that the so - called «Medieval Warm Period» replicates or exceeds the current warming — and so natural variability could possibly account for that warming — I thought it worthwhile to put out some information about Medieval climate.

I can't claim to be a whiz at statistics but I remember telling some skeptics on another forum, Accuweather / climate change I believe, that the major point and problem with this paper were that the results still showed a «hockey stick» indicating current warming was pretty anomalous and that the authors were not climatologists, nor did they seem to consult any to discuss why certain methods were used over the ones they decided to use.

«Borehole temperatures in the ice sheets spanning the last 6000 years show Antarctica repeatedly warming when Greenland cooled, and vice versa... The phenomena has been called the polar see - saw... Attempts to account for it have included the hypothesis of a south - flowing warm ocean current with a built in time lag... There is (however) no significant delay in the Anarctica climate anomaly...

And while the «hockey team» shows the late 20th century and current warming to be unusual, it is not as important in my view as the current warming trend itself.

So, Jacob, if you can show me a theory that makes as much sense of Earth's climate and makes as many verified predictions as the current consensus model and which doesn't imply serious problems due to warming, I'll be the first to pat you on the back.

And in some articles where I have read that it is being observed, often historical data shows those cities and / or regions to have been warmer in the past century, which would seem to indicate (1) the permafrost issue isn't new or necessarily unnatural and / or (2) there is a substantial lag between permafrost melting and rising temps (ie, the current permafrost melt is mostly or all natural).

If it shows a fraction of the current warming, well, then that is interesting too.

Data show that the earth's current warming trend is 200 years old and running.

But the current paper shows that the differences in midcentury warming rates occurred much more rapidly than previously thought (over a few years, not a few decades).

7 - Human use of coal, oil, and natural gas has not harmfully warmed the Earth, and the extrapolation of current trends shows that it will not do so in the foreseeable future.

The figures also show the current «best guess» of the man - made warming to the year 2100, assuming no action is taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Typical temperature reconstructions for the late Pliocene however [see one at the top of this story - 3.3 - 3.0 Ma] already show an Earth in which a warmer climatic state is indeed [through for instance ice albedo feedbacks] relatively strong around the poles, and (on average) weaker around the equator, exactly the pattern that is monitored under the current climate warming.

The Met Office says it doesn't expect temperature records to be broken every year, but «the current situation shows how global warming can combine with smaller, natural fluctuations to push our climate to levels of warmth which are unprecedented in the data records».

His position: • No evidence of increasing lake clarity as a result of secchi measurements since 1946 • The interplay of stratification and plankton productivity are not «straightforward» • Challenges O'Reilly's assumption on the correlation of wind and productivity - the highest production is on the end of the lake with the lowest winds • A strong caution using diatoms as the productivity proxy (it is one of two different lake modes) • No ability to link climate change to productivity changes • More productivity from river than allowed for in Nature Geopscience article • Externally derived nutrients control productivity for a quarter of the year • Strong indications of overfishing • No evidence of a climate and fishery production link • The current productivity of the lake is within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea of declining productivity.

The strength of the Icelandic Low is the critical factor in determining path of the polar jet stream over the North Atlantic In the winter the IL is located at SW of Greenland (driver Subpolar Gyre), but in the summer the IL is to be found much further north (most likely driver the North Icelandic Jet, formed by complex physical interactions between warm and cold currents), which as graphs show had no major ups or downs.

The physical evidence clearly shows that carbon dioxide is causing the current warming trend.

I am not at all surprised to find climate skeptics preferring Mike's description over mine, given that mine tries to fit the current understanding of the impact of rising CO2 on temperature to the data while Mike's uses gross overfitting to show that one does not need CO2 to explain recent global warming.

Tree proxies don't show warming since 1960 so they are claimed not to match current temperatures and not validated against modern measurements.

exactly... i recall seeing a graph produced from ice core samples in which the CO2 content of thousands of years past was measured against tree ring data... what it showed was CO2 levels rising 300 years after rapid vegetative growth (natural warming) and incidently the PPM of CO2 measured higher than current levels.

«The existence of the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period were an embarrassment to the global - warming establishment, because they showed that the current warming is almost indistinguishable from previous warming and coolings that had nothing to do with burning fossil fuel.

I did show longer time scales on the temperature data and proxies not so much to discredit the deceiving hockey stick, but to address the overwhelming belief by the public and policy makers that the current warming is «unprecedented», «dangerous» and nearing a «tipping point».

They explain how, overall, Antarctic sea ice cover (frozen sea surface), for separate reasons involving wind changing in relation to the location of certain warming sea water currents, shows a slight upward trend, though it also shows significant melting in some areas.

In reality, at least 97 percent of climatologists agree that humans cause global warming, and the data show you can't explain the current rising temperatures without human influence.

- Notice, during the current cold phase, there has been permanent ice caps in Antarctica for only 10 million years and at the North Pole for less than 5 million years (demonstrating that ice caps are a rare event in Earth's history, which shows we are in a cold phase)- Notice that the planet has had no ice caps — therefore it has been much warmer than now — for about 80 % of the past 500 million years.

The latter result shows that natural internal variability, as simulated by current climate models, is a highly unlikely explanation for the observed lower tropospheric warming over the satellite era»

It is further shown that the warm phase of the AMO corresponds to a strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) and a weakening of the Atlantic subtropical cell (STC), which both induce an anomalous northward current in the TNA subsurface ocean.

However, the tide - gauge literature data shows the current, rather slow but steady as opposed to accelerating, rate started in 1850, long before CO2 warming could have been the cause.

Any statistically significant trends to the current date show warming.

Referencing a wide array of current political and environmental work, Nordhaus and Shellenberger show how current pop - environmentalism (think Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth) is mired in a «pollution paradigm... profoundly inadequate for understanding and dealing with global warming.»