Not exact matches
Despite a mounting body of research
showing that
high rates of divorce and out - of - wedlock
births pose serious threats to the well - being of children, mainline Protestantism has had remarkably little to say in recent years about the nature, health and prospects of the family.
No matter that it comports with the data from Oregon that
shows that PLANNED homebirth with a LICENSED homebirth midwife has a death rate 9X
higher than comparable risk hospital
birth or that MANA has found that its own members have such hideous death rates that they have been desperately hiding them for years.
A more recent study
showed that low risk
birth (home or hospital) with a Dutch midwife has a
HIGHER perinatal mortality rate than
high risk delivery with a Dutch obstetrician.
The following quote from the article above puzzles me to no end: «The latest CDC figures (publicly available on the CDC Wonder website)
show that planned homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a mortality rate 600 %
HIGHER than low risk hospital
birth.»
CDC data
shows that neonatal mortality is about half as
high with CNM and «other» midwives (there's no direct entry of homebirth category) as it is for MDs for all
births, as well as by weeks gestation.
The latest CDC figures (publicly available on the CDC Wonder website)
show that planned homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a mortality rate 600 %
HIGHER than low risk hospital
birth.
The data from the Netherlands
shows that low risk
birth with a Dutch midwife has a
HIGHER death rate than
high risk
birth with a Dutch obstetrician.
As the recently released statistics from Oregon
show, planned homebirth with a licensed homebirth midwife has a mortality rate 800 %
HIGHER than term hospital
birth.
A study published in the Dec. 2015 issue of
Birth showed that, although Home
Births After Cesarean (HBAC) have
high success rates, when a uterine rupture does occur, perinatal death is more likely.
Studies
show that the breastfeeding relationship has fewer challenges and a
higher rate of success when it is initiated in the first hours after
birth.
So far, the scientific literature
shows that babies who lose greater than 7 % of their
birth weight are at
highest risk of developing excessive jaundice and hypernatremia to levels that can cause long - term developmental disability.
Flint and colleagues suggested that when midwives get to know the women for whom they provide care, interventions are minimised.22 The Albany midwifery practice, with an unselected population, has a rate for normal vaginal
births of 77 %, with 35 % of women having a home
birth.23 A review of care for women at low risk of complications has
shown that continuity of midwifery care is generally associated with lower intervention rates than standard maternity care.24 Variation in normal
birth rates between services (62 % -80 %), however, seems to be greater than outcome differences between «
high continuity» and «traditional care» groups at the same unit.25 26 27 Use of epidural analgesia, for example, varies widely between Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, and the North Staffordshire NHS Trust.
Your midwives saw to it that was maintained as well by not warning you that all of the data on homebirth in the US
show a 3 - 8x
higher risk of the baby dying in homebirth than in hospital
birth.
The study
shows a VERY
HIGH neonatal mortality rate, 400 %
higher than comparable risk hospital
birth.
That book is full of misinformation, for example he cites the Johnson & Daviss study saying «any remaing doubts about the safety of home
birth were conclusively erased» by said study — which isn't even remotely true (the home
birth data from that study actually
shows that neonatal mortality is 3 TIMES
higher at home):
Second, the authors ACTUALLY
showed that homebirth with a CPM in 2000 had a mortality rate 3X
higher than comparable risk hospital
birth in 2000.
The latest data from the CDC (available on the CDC) Wonder website
shows that homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a neonatal mortality rate more than 7 times
HIGHER than low risk hospital
birth.
Most studies of homebirth in other countries have found no statistically significant differences in perinatal outcomes between home and hospital
births for women at low risk of complications.36, 37,39 However, a recent study in the United States
showed poorer neonatal outcomes for
births occurring at home or in
birth centres.40 A meta - analysis in the same year demonstrated
higher perinatal mortality associated with homebirth41 but has been strongly criticised on methodological grounds.5, 42 The Birthplace in England study, 43 the largest prospective cohort study on place of
birth for women at low risk of complications, analysed a composite outcome, which included stillbirth and early neonatal death among other serious morbidity.
This concurs with the Birthplace in England study, 43 which
showed a
higher rate of normal vaginal
birth when women gave
birth outside of a hospital environment.
Unfortunately, the ACOG, the American College of OB - GYN does not endorse or support home
births because their studies
show that there is a
higher incidence of potential harm to the baby in home
birth.
POTTERAnd that there really isn't evidence to
show globally that that is necessary, that we have the third
highest Cesarean section rate in the world, that we have 50 percent of all first - time mothers being induced in the United States really leads us to question what can we do to integrate some of the practices that are successful in home
birth into models in hospitals.
You weren't told that the CDC statistics
show that homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a death rate anywhere from 3 - 7X
higher than comparable risk hospital
birth.
The largest studies of a million term
births failed to conclusively
show that
high cesarean rates are saving the lives of term babies (Pasupathy JAMA 2009).
We found only one other study, conducted in the United States, on mortality associated with breech, twin, and post-term
births at home.9 This study
showed excess mortality in such home
births and voiced concern about the trend to encourage midwives to engage in
high risk practice.
Earlier today I gave a brief overview of the results (Homebirth midwives reveal death rate 450 %
higher than hospital
birth, announce that it
shows homebirth is safe).
All the existing scientific evidence, as well as state and national statistics
shows that American homebirth has an increased risk of death of at least 3 - 9 times
higher than comparable risk hospital
birth.
Water
births show a
higher rate of
births «without injuries», first and second - degree perineal lacerations, vaginal and labial tears.
It seems counterintuitive to think that Vitamin A would be harmful to a developing fetus, but studies have
shown that
high levels of Vitamin A, like those found in some acne treatments, can cause serious
birth defects.
Just 4 months after giving
birth to twins, Rumi and Sir, Beyoncé was seen
showing off in
high - waist pants and crop top, baring her abs!
Mother's milk after a premature
birth is much
higher in certain nutrients, and studies
show superior growth and head circumference in low - weight infants fed milk from preterm baby mothers.
The data also
show that early term babies delivered by cesarean section were at a
higher risk — by 12.2 percent — for admission to the NICU compared with full - term babies and at 7.5 percent
higher risk for morbidity compared with term
births.
In 2004 the
birth of sextuplets, six children, to Pennsylvania couple Kate and Jon Gosselin helped them to launch their television series, originally Jon & Kate Plus 8 and (following their divorce) Kate Plus 8, which became the
highest - rated
show on the TLC network.
The authors concluded that the findings of this study
showed a significantly increased total and early neonatal mortality for home
births and even
higher risks for women of 41 weeks or longer and women having a first
birth.
In fact, the latest statistics from the CDC
show that planned homebirth in 2007 with a homebirth midwife (often called a certified professional midwife, CPM, or licensed midwife, LM) had a newborn death rate more than 7 TIMES
higher than low risk hospital
birth.
«There's a large body of research that
shows that home
birth is safe in other
high - resource countries... but there's been some ongoing question about whether those data can actually transfer to the United States,» Melissa Cheyney, an associate professor of Medical Anthropology at Oregon State University, told The Huffington Post.
Research has also
shown that boys have
higher cortisol levels (the stress hormone) after a traumatic
birth where they were separated from their mothers, or their caregiver was unresponsive.
In - hospital Attended by MD / DO / CNM Gestation 37 weeks and up (it's hard to make this correspond, as MANAStats didn't give gestation lengths, but only 2.5 % of their mothers «
showed clinical signs» of preterm
birth) Singleton and twins (MANAStats didn't include any
higher order multiples) Vaginal and c / s Death from < 1 hour to 28 days of life
I think the closest I've seen was the Birthplace study done in the UK, which
showed, for ultra low - risk women in the UK who had a previous vaginal
birth, homebirth could be almost as safe as hospital (first - time moms had
higher incidences of perinatal mortality and neonatal brain injuries).
because a study
showing a
higher homebirth death rate should * absolutely * be spun in a way to encourage women to give
birth at home.
One quick google search will
show that the neonatal death rate in the United States is 6.37, NOT 0.38, making the hospital death rate 320 %
HIGHER than the home
birth rate you cited.
To summarize, the MANA statistics
show that homebirth as practiced in the US has a death rate 450 %
higher than hospital
birth.
So questions popped up when I read some of those studies that actually
showed a
higher (although barely but still a
higher) perinatal rate with hospital
births.
Homebirth midwives reveal death rate 450 %
higher than hospital
birth, announce that it
shows homebirth is safe
Show evidence that only 2.7 % of pregnancies and
births are
high risk, or admit you were wrong.
He notes the importance of understanding that children who co-sleep with their parents routinely from
birth may take longer to transition into solitary sleeping; however the trade off is that in the long term, research has
shown that these children tend to develop
higher levels of resilience and self - sufficiency, be comfortable being alone when necessary, be effective problem solvers, and make friends easily.
While
high testosterone levels have been linked to aggression, extroversion, and risk - taking, drops in testosterone have been linked to fathers» responsiveness to their children, Other research
shows that the hormones prolactin and cortisol (both connected with pregnant women) rise significantly in the three weeks before
birth is due.
Research has
shown that the possibility of fatality for mothers undergoing c - sections is three times
higher compared to those who opt for natural
birth.
In another study in which expectant fathers were sampled for T multiple times during their partners» pregnancies and after the women gave
birth, those men with
high T during the pregnancy
showed a significant decline in the first week after
birth (40).
In Oregon, baby death when using nonhospital midwives
shown to be 6 - 8 times
higher than hospital
birth: Judith Rooks» report to the Oregon State Legislature
Yesterday I gave a brief overview of the new MANA statistics paper (Homebirth midwives reveal death rate 450 %
higher than hospital
birth, announce that it
shows homebirth is safe) and pointed out that the fact that MANA waited 5 years to release the results demonstrates that Cheyney at el.