Not exact matches
It provides that a court shall award
actual damages, and may award punitive
damages, if a SLAPP defendant
shows that the SLAPP was brought to harass, inhibit the defendant's public participation or exercise
of constitutional rights, or otherwise wrongfully injure the defendant.
As to the projected decline in hurricane
damage as a fraction
of GDP, an even casual reading
of the relevant paper
shows that while
actual damage is predicted to increase in most places, GDP is forecast to go up even faster, so that the ratio declines.
I am just speculating,
of course, but I find it easier to imagine the
damage control meeting this morning at Heartland coming up with an imaginary theft scenario and a denial
of the most embarassing
of the documents than to imagine anything comparable happening at a second rank British university which
showed anything but PR and legal agility in the
actual event.
I doubt any
of the plaintiffs can
show actual damages at this time.
So the plaintiffs in this case need to either (a)
show actual damages, or (b) convince the court under the applicable standard
of proof that they will suffer
damages and they are likely to prevail on the merits
of the case, and possibly secure a bond for the losses to the defendants in the meantime.
In order to prove negligence on the part
of a defendant, a plaintiff must
show: (1) the defendant owed the victim a duty to exercise a certain level
of care, (2) breach
of that duty, (3) proximate cause, and (4)
actual damages.
The defendant employer appealed the award
of aggravated
damages given by the deputy judge, arguing that she erred in law when she awarded aggravated
damages when there was no finding by the deputy judge that the employer had conducted itself in a manner that was unfair or in bad faith when it terminated Mr. Walker such as to justify an award
of aggravated
damages; and furthermore, there was no evidence, in any form, to
show that the Respondent suffered any
actual damages as a result
of his termination.
This might be negligence on the part
of the company, which might require that
actual damages be
shown.
To sue a driver for negligence, a plaintiff must
show (1) a duty owed, (2) breach
of that duty, (3)
actual and proximate cause, and (4)
damages.
Though manufacturers are generally strictly liable for the
actual damages caused by their products, punitive
damage awards typically require a higher
showing of reprehensible conduct.
To prove another party's liability for negligence under Maine law, an injured victim must
show that (1) the defendant owed the victim a duty
of care, (2) the defendant breached that duty, (3) the breach caused the victim's injuries, and (4) the victim suffered
actual damages as a result
of the defendant's breach.
The plaintiff must be able to
show that the defendant owed him or her a reasonable standard
of care, which the defendant breached, and that the breach was the
actual or proximate cause
of the injuries and
damages that resulted.
The complainant must
show proof
of a proximate cause and
actual damages.
To establish a private action claim under section 36
of the Act, a private plaintiff must
show that a defendant contravened one
of the criminal provisions
of the Act (e.g., establish all
of the elements
of a criminal price - fixing conspiracy, criminal misleading advertising, etc.) or breached a Tribunal or court order under the Act and has suffered
actual damage or loss as a result
of the conduct.
Without
showing the difference between the negotiation position truly lost (the «better outcome» that «would have» been accepted) and the position a plaintiff actually obtained, any claim
of a causal link to
actual damages should be considered speculative.
To claim for negligence arising from property owner's carelessness, the victim must
show that the owner or manager had a duty
of care towards him or her and that the property owner breached the duty, and that the breach was the
actual cause
of injuries and those
damages arose from the accident.
The chart below
shows actual quotes from six insurers for a female California driver with a clean record and liability coverage limits
of $ 100,000 per person, $ 300,000 per accident and $ 50,000 for property
damage, plus uninsured motorist coverage in the same amounts.