Sentences with phrase «showing real observations»

Or, if you are conducting experiments in class have students create an interactive report, narrating their actions and showing real observations with video.

Not exact matches

«We weren't sure why it was there, but it was unique enough that we thought it should show up in observations, too, if it was actually real,» said Ross, now a postdoctoral research associate, Princeton University.

He had his first solo museum show at the Museum Haus Lange in Krefeld in 1970, but in 1973 his real identity was discovered and he was thereafter dogged by visits from the Stasi and kept under observation.

The works shown have clear connections to the Post-war aesthetics of phenomenological works in the style of Alberto Giacometti (1901 - 1966) with real - life observations of life and nature.

«The idea [for «The Real Thing»] grew out of the observation that we at Flowers could do more to promote female photographers as our current roster of photographers is a bit male dominant,» show curator and coordinator Brent Beamon tells CH.

A simple comparison of observations with projections based on real world climate forcings shows a very close match, especially if we take natural unforced variability into account as well (mainly ENSO).

It would please me so if it turns out that my observations are shown to be fatally flawed and Brian's perceptions of what is somehow real are altogether proven to be the correct ones.

It appears that real world observations and not the wishful thinking of «uncertainty» shows that if anything, problems are arising faster than anticipated.

This essay is an attempt to link real world observations (the failure of surface temperatures to rise in tandem with atmospheric CO2) to basic physics and thereby show why the radiative characteristics of Greenhouse Gases can not increase the surface temperature of a planet when atmospheric mass, the strength of the gravitational field and the power of insolation at the top of the atmosphere remain the same.

These facts were enough for an NAS panel, including Christy, to publish a report Reconciling Observations of Global Temperature Change which concluded that «Despite differences in temperature data, strong evidence exists to show that the warming of the Earth's surface is undoubtedly real, and surface temperatures in the past two decades have risen at a rate substantially greater than average for the past 100 years»

It shows up well in their Figure 1a about which they state ``... you can see how well the POGA H global average surface temperature matches the observations...» It matches well the phony eighties and nineties and would be off the mark if the real temperatures were substituted.

However, before they should be provided to the impacts communities as anything more than a model sensitivity study, they must be shown to have skill with respect to real world observations.

What the CERN / CLOUD result did show was that soluble organics, sulphides and NHx complexes are required for the formnation of cloud condensation nuclei at the rate seen in observations of the real atmosphere.

It should be interesting to watch as real science turns on these misguided few and grinds their phony advocate propaganda science up, based on observations which have begun to show, and I believe will continue to show, their erroneous overprediction of future warming.

This topic calls for a much more thorough treatment, but from the sidelines there are many large and small observations that can be made which seemingly in the real world always come out to show renewables underperforming and conventional technology over performing.

Show me the empirical data, based on real - time physical observations or reproducible experimentation (NOT climate model runs), which support the premise that GH warming requires decades or even centuries to reach «equilibrium».

One could argue that real SST measurements aren't quite so well - behaved, but it is possible to show (see Figure 11 of the HadSST2 paper, Rayner et al. 2006 for details) that the standard deviation of grid box averages falls roughly as one over the square root of the number of contributing observations and that the standard deviation for gridbox averages based on a single observation is a lot less than 10 degrees.

Less than 2.5 percent of model runs show that global warming is really global luke warming to the degree that real - world observations indicate.

There are no real - world physical measurements, empirical observations, or controlled scientific experiments that show that varying CO2 in volumes of 0.000001 over a body of water causes heat changes in that body of water.

Only the GIGO models predict global harm from that essential trace gas, while real world observations show that CO2 is harmless.

I was under the impression (from a quick read of the paper) that the paper showed that IPCC models and real satelite observations don't match because IPCC models are wrong.

My own goal is to have readers (and maybe even but not necessarily Graeme) understand the invalidity of his argument asserting that (essentially) one sea level time series observation at one coastal location that (allegedly) doesn't show much change in several decades does not imply that the sea level changes have been the same at all other coastal locations (give or take 100 mm)- which implies that any observed variations exceeding this level in sea level rise at different locations around the world are «not real» and hence sea level rise due to global warming isn't anything to worry about.

(This one includes the dynamite John Christy graph showing the rapidly growing divergence of climate model global temperature forecasts with real world observations.)

The real - world observation I cited shows that it does not].

Yet, real observations show the opposite — temperature has declined as carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas of most concern to the IPCC, increased.

«If the models are unreliable, then there is little basis for concern, since real - world observations show that the climate change of the past century falls well within natural variability.

http://www.batonrougerealestateappraisal.com/ — Baton Rouge Real Estate Observations: Southwest Baton Rouge Market Shows Strong Comeback into 2010 Wow, what a difference 6 months can make in a housing market.