Sentences with phrase «showing small correlations»

Not exact matches

«Our explicit calculations show that though the correlations start off very small, they grow in time and become large enough to change the outcome.»

(Interesting note, there has been a correlation shown between consumption of simple carbohydrates and increase in small, dense LDL)

(2) Natural factors (volcanoes, solar cycle) influencing the trend are very small in comparison to anthropogenic CO2 (as e.g. standard correlation analyses show, see for example Lean and Rind 2008, Foster and Rahmstorf 2011).

Completely independently of this oceanographic data, a simple correlation analysis (Foster and Rahmstorf ERL 2011) showed that the flatter warming trend of the last 10 years was mostly a result of natural variability, namely the recently more frequent appearance of cold La Niña events in the tropical Pacific and a small contribution from decreasing solar activity.

None of the correlations showed an r2 > 0.24 (highest in August), and most were much smaller (especially during the key spring period where the variance explained was less than 5 %).

Hunter, All that you say may be true but the combined effect of all of these factors is so small that, as is shown, an excellent correlation with the measured average global temperatures is obtained when they are ignored and the only factors considered are time - integral of sunspots and a temperature oscillation (the oscillation is probably from ocean turnover).

MWMT and MAP had relatively small effects on tree growth (less than 40 % of the analyzed groups showed significant correlations), whereas the effect of MCMT on tree growth was mostly negative among the detected significant groups (Fig. 3B).

The correlations over the full period 1900 - 2004 are here: and The latter still shows some correlation, but a huge change in temperature of halve the scale has a small influence on CO2 levels, while the total change in temperature over 104 years should have a huge influence.

Apart from the small number of observations on which Salby bases his theory, the main error is in jumping from showing a correlation between temperature and short term fluctuations in CO2 to concluding that the long term trend must also be attributable to temperature.

The same hurricane damage database that is too small a sample to show a correlation with the Atlantic basin, annual total PDI is perfectly able to show a very strong statistical relationship with another climate index, the annual ASO Nino 3.4 temperature anomaly index.

It is that the ice core samples CAN NOT actually STATISTICALLY show any «Population correlation», they are too small, and so be indicative OF a «Population behavior».

Making more money, which law school you went to, the corresponding debt load, making law review, or the ranking of your law school itself — all of them — «showed zero to small correlations with lawyer well - being.»