You then refer to http://sealevel.colorado.edu/ and say «It clearly
shows sea levels are the same now as they were 4 or 5 years ago.»
The large diagram
shows the sea levels over the past 2000 years.
The graph you linked to
shows sea levels on a steady rise in levels.
«Fossil coral reefs
show sea level rose in bursts during last warming: Reefs near Texas endured punctuated bursts of sea - level rise before drowning.»
According to your article «Sea level rising faster», recent measurements
show the sea level rise since 1993 to be 3...
The first image, based on data from January 1997 when El Nio was still strengthening
shows a sea level rise along the Equator in the eastern Pacific Ocean of up to 34 centimeters with the red colors indicating an associated change in sea surface temperature of up to 5.4 degrees C.
(Parenthetically, tide gauge measurements of sea level are made relative to the adjacent land, and have
shown sea level rises encroaching on the shoreline).
Both El Niños
show sea level anomalies of up to 8 inches across the eastern tropical Pacific (and corresponding drops in other parts of the ocean basin).
Figure 3
shows the sea level not to have been high during the Roman Warm Period and Medieval Warm Period.
As I understand it, Hansen has said that the paleoclimate record
shows sea level rise as much as several metres per century is not unheard of.
This seems like particularly important new research: From CNN «Satellite observations
show sea levels rising, and climate change is accelerating it».
An obvious question is how this acceleration can be possible in light of the satellite data
showing sea level falling over the last 2 years.
# 82, Timo, I can't find that paper, but here are some related charts that
show sea level rises overall, but thermal contraction since 2003, perhaps that's what you were referring to?
The TAR
showed sea level rise curves for a range of emission scenarios (shown in the Figure above together with the new observational record of Church and White 2006).
At the same time, the GRACE gravitational - anomaly satellites, the most accurate method of measurement we have,
showed sea level actually falling from 2003 — 2009.
Also, sea level has been predicted to rise rapidly, but the European Envisat satellite
showed sea level to have risen at a rate of just 1.3 inches per century from 2004 — 2012.
There's also lots of research
showing sea level rise is begining to approach the Early Holocene Sea level Rise.
NOAA tide gauge in the Marshall Islands
shows sea level rising at 1.43 mm / year — less than 15 cm per century *
The tide gauge at Crescent City
shows sea level declining and the ones at Alameda and Monterey show no change in sea level.
Satellites
show no sea level rise along the entire west coast.
Morner presented data that
showed sea level is not rising as a result of AGW at a detectable rate anywhere.
Further sources here
showing sea level rise acceleration, anthropogenic contributions to sea level rise, projections of future sea level rise, etc:
Yes, it continues to
show sea level remains stubbornly well above the trend line, which means 5, 10, 15, and maybe even 20 - year rates re far above the satellite - era trend of 3.4 mm per yr.
Pingback: Latest Data
Show NO SEA LEVEL RISE ACCELERATION Since 1993... Coasts: Less Than 2 Millimeters Annually!
But it wasn't until a 2016 study commissioned by Imperial Beach
showed sea level had already risen significantly along the city's ocean side and bay side, and appeared certain to continue to rise, that the city was confronted by the enormity of the devastation ahead, Haines wrote.
Other areas, such as tidewater Virginia, tidal gages
show sea levels are rising due to land subsidence, primarily from groundwater extraction.
The figure below
shows sea level for the last 24,000 years.
The figure below (Figure 5 a-c) provided by Cecilia Bitz, and similar plots provided by Oleg M. Pokrovsky and the NIC Group,
shows the sea level pressure field centered over the Northern Hemisphere for July 2008, July 2007, and for July average conditions (climatology).
Gavin Schmidt investigated the claim that tide gauges on islands in the Pacific Ocean
show no sea level rise and found that the data show a rising sea level trend at every single station.
If you go to Tamino's thread (previously linked) the next to last graph (easiest to read)
shows sea level as -160 mm in 1880 and +70 mm in 2013.
The blue line in the graph below clearly
shows sea level as rising, while the upward curve suggests sea level is rising faster as time goes on.
In Judith's presentation is a graphic
showing sea level change!
The latest projections
show sea level rising by up to 6 feet during this century.
Bill Innis: Jevrejeva's most recent tide gauge data from 2003 to 2009
shows sea level is actually falling The data will likely become available soon.
tl; dr was: viewing an alignment that
shows sea level rise as suspicious is your good right, but aren't flat or descreasing alignments equally suspicious by the same «rules»?
The accompanying graph
shows sea level rise from the end of the last ice age to the present.
But it wasn't
showing sea level rise until the «adjustments» were made; prior to the re-aligning of the data to show a rise, the raw data showed flat or declining sea levels.
Have you seen a much - fanfared NASA video
showing sea level peaks spreading west from California coast?
The data - adjusters take misaligned and incomplete sea level data from tide gauges that
show no sea level rise (or even a falling trend).
It shows no sea level rise in that part of Alaska.
That shows the Maldives are indeed in need of a sea level adjustment to the raw tide gauges since surrounding sites which are not tiny little islands
show no sea level rise, recently.
These graphs
show sea level pressure anomalies or differences from average sea level pressure in the Northern Hemisphere for April, May, June, and July 2016.
Luke: Tide gauges
show sea level rise has generally decreased over the last 65 years.
If you write that «Latest sea level measurements from benchmark island
shows sea level is dropping», you need to be told, if you are still there, that that is rubbish.
Some regions
show a sea level rise substantially more than the global average (in many cases of more than twice the average), and others a sea level fall (Table 11.15)(note that these figures do not include sea level rise due to land ice changes).
When we add the graphs
showing sea level rise, loss of glaciers, mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica, and upper ocean temperature, we have multiple trend lines all pointing in one direction: A warming world.
Not exact matches
Two new studies
show the current is slowly weakening, so it's not threatening an instant ice age, but rather colder weather in Europe, higher
sea levels on the U.S. east coast, and depleted fisheries.
But research has
shown Guam is among the top five most vulnerable US military installations worldwide due to coastal erosion, extreme weather and rising
sea levels linked to climate change.
Seattle - based map - maker and urban planner Jeffrey Linn has released a series of city maps including one for Vancouver,
showing how rising
sea levels might drastically change coastal living.
Evidence from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
shows that global
sea levels in the last two decades are rising dramatically as surface temperatures warm oceans and...