Sentences with phrase «shows substantial interest»

This shows substantial interest in blockchain in China's part and an upswing in research considering they nearly

Businesses have already shown substantial interest in the potential applications.

Not exact matches

... Without a clear showing of substantial harm to the tangible interests of others, speculation or mere moral objections alone should not override the moral right of infertile couples to use those techniques to form families.

Also noted in Miranda's round - up: Google search trends show a substantial spike in interest in Teachout and Wu in New York, especially down - state.

Once again, since equity doesn't show up on your credit report or require monthly payments, the savings in interest alone could be substantial.

«Research has shown huge decreases in fees, especially late fees and over-balance fees, with no substantial increase in interest charges (or perhaps decreases).»

The writing is universally great, and while the prose may come across as somewhat... er, overdone at times, showing a clear need for some substantial editing, there's no denying that they all carefully help to craft an interesting world.

More than thirty years after her death, the oeuvre of American painter Alice Neel attracts ever greater interest, and seems only ever more relevant: the substantial and moving exhibition of her paintings currently at the Gemeentemuseum in The Hague is the latest indication of this groundswell of attention, including various shows and catalogs in addition to a fine biography by Phoebe Hoban and a biographical film directed by Neel's grandson, Andrew Neel.

For now, get along and take advantage of the chance to see this substantial show of new work that is particularly interesting in relation to positions taken by artists working here such as Helen Marten and Magali Reus.

to property, a plaintiff must show: (1) an invasion affecting an interest in exclusive possession; (2) the act resulting in the invasion was intentional; (3) reasonable foreseeability that the act could result in an invasion of the plaintiff's possessory interest; and (4) substantial damage to the property.

Modification of custody based upon custodial parent's relocation is determined under the general modification statute; substantial change in circumstances must be shown and that modification will serve the best interests of the child.

It would introduce a statutory defence of responsible publication on a matter of public interest, protect those reporting on proceedings in Parliament and other issues of public concern, and require claimants to show substantial harm and corporate bodies to show financial loss.

A number of studies have shown that while a substantial number of individuals or couples indicated initially — pre-IVF treatment — that they would be interested in donating their surplus embryos for third - party reproduction or research, the vast majority did not follow through when asked again to make a decision following treatment.

(c) The court shall determine all matters relating to parenting and time - sharing of each minor child of the parties in accordance with the best interests of the child and in accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, except that modification of a parenting plan and time - sharing schedule requires a showing of a substantial, material, and unanticipated change of circumstances.

According to Vermont child custody law, the court will only consider a modification if there is a real and substantial showing of a change of circumstances that threaten to harm the child's best interests.

Before the court will authorize a modification, a substantial and material change affecting the best interests of the child must be shown.

But in order for a judge to grant the changes, you have to show that there was a «substantial, unanticipated» change of circumstances and that changing the plan will be in the best interest of the child.

You must be able to show the court that circumstances have changed in a substantial, material and unanticipated way, and that the modification you are requesting is in the best interests of your child.

--(2)(c) The court shall determine all matters relating to parenting and time - sharing of each minor child of the parties in accordance with the best interests of the child and in accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, except that modification of a parenting plan and time - sharing schedule requires a showing of a substantial, material, and unanticipated change of circumstances.

Once the initial custody determination has been made if either parent wants to change the custody arrangement they have to show the court, first and foremost, that there has been a substantial change in circumstances which effect the best interests of the child.

You must show that it is in the child's best interest to modify the order, and demonstrate a significant or substantial change in circumstances since the original order was made.

Section 16 - 911 (a-2)(4)(A) states that modification or termination of a custody order can occur only upon a showing that there has been a substantial and material change in circumstances and that a modification or termination is in the best interest of the child.

In order to receive an injunction, a party must show: a substantial likelihood that the party will prevail on the merits; the party will suffer an irreparable injury unless the injunction is granted; a showing that the threatened injury outweighs whatever damage will be caused to the other parties; and finally, a showing that the injunction would not be against the public interest.

To regulate lawful, non-misleading commercial speech, the government must show: that it has a substantial government interest in regulating the speech; that the regulation advances the governmental interest; and that the regulation goes no farther than necessary to advance the governmental interest.

To regulate commercial speech, the Village must show: 1) that it has a substantial government interest in regulating the speech; 2) that the regulation of the speech advances the governmental interest; and 3) that the regulation goes no farther than necessary to advance the governmental interest.