Graph A is completely different and
shows tidal effects on earth that are not subject to planetary precessions and is far more accurate in my opinion of maintaining a more precise longer lasting 60 year period.
Not exact matches
While the new study
shows that
tidal effects can account for the overall shape of the moon,
tidal processes don't explain the topographical differences between the near side and the far side.
When it formed from the solar nebula, Venus would have had a much faster, prograde rotation, but calculations
show that over billions of years,
tidal effects on its dense atmosphere could have slowed down its initial rotation to the value seen today.
The present warming phase is now around 15000 years old in its obvious
effects, perhaps 20000 in overall duration, and is leading back, as might a «
tidal effect», running back from the equator returning to the Polar Regions, which are NOW
showing the
effects in an observable manner.
There is also the fact that as LOD is influenced by
tidal effects from the Sun and Moon and ENSO, zonal winds etc are also to some extent modulated by the same
tidal effects the same influence
shows up in both.