Primarily because we do not find the same benefits in better - designed studies —
sibling comparison studies and the PROBIT randomized controlled trial.
Not exact matches
A
comparison group of 210
siblings without cancer also responded to the survey and were used as a control for the
study.
Siblings in the current study rated themselves as more prosocial, and teachers rated siblings as more likeable, than compariso
Siblings in the current
study rated themselves as more prosocial, and teachers rated
siblings as more likeable, than compariso
siblings as more likeable, than
comparison peers.
The purpose of the current
study was to provide a more comprehensive quantitative examination of the social functioning of
siblings of children with cancer by contrasting them with matched
comparison peers across a range of measures completed by multiple informants (peers, teachers, parents, and self) in the school and home settings.
Miriam Evensen, Torkild Hovde Lyngstad, Ole Melkevik, Arnstein Mykletun; The Role of Internalizing and Externalizing Problems in Adolescence for Adult Educational Attainment: Evidence from
Sibling Comparisons using Data from the Young HUNT
Study, European Sociological Review, Volume 32, Issue 5, 1 October 2016, Pages 552 — 566, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw001
With regard to the
sibling effect, relatively little attention has been devoted to the role of
siblings and their impact on one another's development, in
comparison to the wealth of
studies on parent - child relationships (Howe & Recchia, 2006).