Sentences with phrase «sibling interaction in»

Not exact matches

From having read Siblings Without Rivalry I knew not to set up any situations in which I was getting angry or telling him he was bad for interacting with his brother (even when that interaction was covertly malicious).

Meaningful positive interaction in the form of eye contact, smiling, and physical affection can result in the child bonding with a variety of people, including fathers, grandparents, siblings, or even neighbours.

No matter how much we try to instill a sense of cooperation in our children, we see their competitive natures peek out in sibling rivalry and playground peer interactions.

Through their partnership, Klin eventually persuaded Ramsay to study the younger siblings to identify differences in their vocal interactions with the hope of one day screening for autism using vocalizations.

The effects held up whether the elder brother died in childhood or not, suggesting that the negative outcome is not a result of some direct sibling interaction, such as competition for food, regular beatings or the practice of primogeniture, in which the eldest brother inherits everything.

Consistent with this prediction, longitudinal research (Carstensen, 1992) has shown that frequency of interaction in and satisfaction with relationships with emotionally significant social network members (i.e., siblings, parents, spouses, and children) increases from age 18 to age 50.

Seeing Rululeth's siblings or Nosuri and Ougi's interactions with their father puts Haku's friends in a larger context than being just sidekicks in his story.

When a frustrated Michael, his calm, collected façade all but shattered by an afternoon spent with his mercurial father, asks (to no one in particular) why he can't hold it together and reverts back to a long - dormant, destructive pattern of father - son interaction, he's both uttering a truism - bordering - on - cliché, but also speaking for every member of the audience with a parent, a child, or a sibling (i.e., everyone).

In this exhibition, «sibling rivalry» expands to encompass a dynamic interaction between art practices occurring in the two primary art and culture production centers of the United StateIn this exhibition, «sibling rivalry» expands to encompass a dynamic interaction between art practices occurring in the two primary art and culture production centers of the United Statein the two primary art and culture production centers of the United States.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.

The unstandardized coefficient associated with S1 provides the amount of variance in S2 accounted for by shared environment, and the unstandardized coefficient associated with the interaction between S1 and sibling relationship provides the amount of variance in S2 accounted for by heritability.

Articles discuss issues in sibling relationships, including problem behavior; interactions with playmates and teachers; role of familism; links with individual adjustment; maternal perception of sibling negativity; transition to siblinghood; parental differential treatment; adjustment; adolescent substance use; conduct problems; delinquency training; risk to siblings in abusing families; adjustment to chronic disability; and antisocial behavior.

The second problem is that the environmental factors examined in the studies usually cited as evidence for gene - environment interactions — for example, high family conflict (Bergeman, Plomin, McClearn, Pedersen, & Friberg, 1988), low socioeconomic status (Cloninger, Sigvardsson, Bohman, & von Knorring, 1982), or criminal parents (Mednick, Gabrielli, & Hutchings, 1987)-- can not account for differences between siblings reared together.

In a follow - up study 10 years after the divorce, however, the youngest children were adjusting to their new environments and interactions better than siblings who were older at the time of the divorce.

A child's interactions with technology and media often involve other people in the child's social world (peers, siblings, parents, caregivers, teachers, etc.) so when adults co-engage they should provide support for, and talk with children about the technologies and media present in children's lives (Paciga & Donohue, 2017).

Given that maladaptive family interactions characterize families with depressed parents and are associated with poor sibling relationships, which are associated with poorer youth outcomes, it follows that sibling relationships in families with a depressed parent also may be impaired.

In fact, researchers have concluded that sibling relationships are unique from any other in that they can be as influential as both adult - child relationships and peer - to - peer interactionsIn fact, researchers have concluded that sibling relationships are unique from any other in that they can be as influential as both adult - child relationships and peer - to - peer interactionsin that they can be as influential as both adult - child relationships and peer - to - peer interactions.1

Two important questions for future research are the roles that children's personality traits and early relations with siblings may play in both sibling interaction patterns in adulthood and mothers» preferences for care.

Thus, it is important to understand what leads siblings to have high levels of tension in their relationships when parents need care because even high levels of positive interaction do not buffer stress when they are accompanied by interpersonal stress.

The current study measured outcomes on three levels of evaluation: changes in the family interaction process at the termination of treatment (tertiary prevention); recidivism rates 6 to 18 months following treatment (secondary prevention); and rate of sibling contact with the court 2.5 to 3.5 years following intervention (primary prevention).

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary

Intervention programs addressing problematic sibling relationships are in their infancy, but recent evidence suggests that social skills training can help reduce conflict between young siblings and increase their prosocial interactions.

16 - 911 (5)(C) states that the court should consider «the interaction and interrelationship of the child with his or her parent or parents his or her siblings, and any other person who may emotionally or psychologically affect the child's best interest» and 16 - 911 (5)(H) permits the court to assess «the prior involvement of each parent in the child's life.»

To date, few studies have utilized electronic Ecological Momentary Assessment (e.EMA) as a methodology that allows siblings to record in real time and across everyday settings their patterns of interaction, including rule breaking behavior.

And the best interests standard requires the court to apply the same factors in any custody decision: the wishes of the parents; the need to assure a continuing and meaningful relationship with both parents and which parent would be more likely to facilitate that relationship; the interaction of the child with parents, siblings and other family members; which parent would more likely allow frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with the other parent; the child's adjustment to home, school and community; the mental and physical health of both parents, including any issues of domestic violence; the intention of either parent to relocate; and the wishes of the child, if the child is sufficiently mature to express such wishes.

[FN43] These custody provisions provided the court with guidelines similar to those found in other custody statutes: the wishes of the child; the wishes of the child's parents; interaction with parents, siblings and other individuals to whom the child is emotionally or * 778 psychologically connected; the child's adjustment to home, school and community; and the mental and physical health of all involved.

Sibling interaction was observed in sibling pairs participating in the Iowa Youth and Families Project (IYFP) at baseline; younger sibling use of alcohol was tracked for 3 additional annual assesSibling interaction was observed in sibling pairs participating in the Iowa Youth and Families Project (IYFP) at baseline; younger sibling use of alcohol was tracked for 3 additional annual assessibling pairs participating in the Iowa Youth and Families Project (IYFP) at baseline; younger sibling use of alcohol was tracked for 3 additional annual assessibling use of alcohol was tracked for 3 additional annual assessments.

Most importantly, and in line with our predictions, the main effect was qualified by a significant interaction between sibling type and attachment to the sibling and romantic partner, F (2, 327) = 59.40, p <.001, η2partial =.27; see Figure 1.

In fact, siblings serve as sources of social interaction and support across the life course (A. Rossi & P. H. Rossi, 1990; Campbell et al., 1999; Connidis & Campbell, 1995; Spitze & Trent, 2006; Voorpostel & Blieszner, 2008; White, 2001; White & Reidmann, 1992).

Parent - child feedback predicts sibling contrast: Using twin studies to test theories of parent - offspring interaction in infant behavior

They broke my heart a little with their eagerness for human interaction, so I smiled and nodded during their tales of Telstra woe, siblings being in hospital after a «fall», our cupcakes being too expensive and their desire to wipe out every politician with a machine gun...