Sentences with phrase «sic et»

Karl Barth understood this well when he wrote: «Strange as it may seem, it is still true, that those who fail to understand other churches than their own are not the people who care intensely about theology, but the theological dilettantes, eclectics, and historians of all sorts; while those very men who have found themselves forced to confront a clear, thoroughgoing, logical sic et non find themselves allied to each other in spite of all contradictions, by an underlying fellowship and understanding, even in the cause which they handle so differently and approach from such painfully different angles.

One of his more famous books was Sic et Non (Yes and No).

Peter Abelard's seminal work, Sic et non, which quoted Church Fathers on both sides of a series of theological questions, set the tone for the Questions genre of the Middle Ages, The writer set out a Question, stated the best arguments on both sides (thesis and antitheses), made a determination (synthesis), and then rebutted each of the antitheses in detail.

This effort was in a measure successful but it is interesting to note that in the Middle Ages Peter Abelard was nevertheless driven to write his Liber Sententiarum sic et non citing over one hundred and fifty subjects on which the early Fathers were in considerable disagreement with one another!

Not exact matches

Outer space, courtly love, casual sex, alien abduction, et sic in infinitum, with comics by Lala Albert and Jack Teadle.

«In summary, the error in my interpretation of the Lin et al lapse rate trends does not alter the conclusions in Pielke and Matsui 2007 (sic) and Klotzbach et al. 2009.

Human engineering is back in the news with a report from UNEP being puffed here http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/feb/20/climate-change-overconsumption Authors Paul Erlich, Bob Watson, James Hansen et al say: «To transition (sic) to a more sustainable future will require simultaneously redesigning the economic system, a technological revolution, and, above all, behavioural change.»

Cook et al. is -LCB- sic -RCB- not trying to claim that the science is settled because there is a consensus.

«Modelers defend this situation... by arguing that aerosols have cancelled [sic] much of the warming (viz Schwartz et al, 2010)... However, a recent paper (Ramanathan, 2007) points out that aerosols can warm as well as cool»

Peter Lang fantasizes «Researchers [Marcott et al.] should go to goal [sic gaol?]

The Physical Science Basis (sic)(Solomon et al. 2007) is the complete absence of any science — it never shows the chemical formula for combustion of a hydrocarbon fuel, yet that combustion is what it demonises, even though it has been the basis for the huge improvement in global living standards since 1750.

dhogaza: Tamino outed himself as Grant Foster at RC when as «guest poster (sic)» on 16 September 2007 he proceeded to plagiarise (if he was not one of the authors) the paper by GF, Annan, Schmidt and Mann which had been submitted to JGR on the 10th; the paper attacked Stephen Schwartz» paper in JGR before that had even appeared; Tamino's graphs required direct access to the data in GF et al, and it would certainly be very odd for Gavin Schmidt to commission the guest posting if not from his co-author, who at one point uses the term «we» confirming that «Tamino» was the lead author.

Perhaps while I am waiting for Max to suggest what is missing from the PDO correlation with temperature trends over the last 160 years I may take the liberty of suggesting that in respect of the overall upwards trend in temperature, despite the PDO oscillations [sic], that ENSO asymmetry adequately explains the [slight] temperature increase over that period; see the David Stockwell comment on the McLean et al paper for an overview of such non-linear asymmetry:

«Schmith et al. also raise the possibility of «nonsense correlations,» that is, real correlations that do not have a causal basis [sic].

To make matters worse, if you use the «Reflex Record» on the Court of Appeal's page, you get, not the dismissal of application of the leave to appeal, but a reference to «a related decision», Superintendent of Financial Services v. National Bank of Canada, Informal Committee of Noteholders and Ernst & Young Inc., in it's [sic] capacity as Court - Appointed Monitor, Qit - Fer et Titane Inc. and Bank of Nova Scotia, 2007 CanLII 15978 (S.C.C.) where leave to appeal another decision was given!

Thirdly, and finally, many attorneys thus promote the use of many antiquated phrases, historical metaphors, and latin terms as «short - hand» methods of explaining legal concepts, however, ipso facto, these attorneys may obfuscate the terms about which they seek clarity, et sic porro.