Sentences with phrase «side a person what»

am 5,2 short chuncky wear faletheeth an glasses do nt like to be jugde by my looks it whats in side a person what counts

Not exact matches

«It's what's behind that fortified entryway in terms of the school climate, the culture, the training, the people side of school safety that makes school safety different and more important and meaningful.»
Once you understand what's truly going on on the other side of the fence, and have the other person's needs in mind, the listening has one overarching theme: How can I help the other person?
I once saw a senior leader take the side of the client against his own people who had done what he had told them to do.
Most people screw it up by thinking they already know the other side's position, and so they don't listen carefully to what their counterpart has to say.
When you think about conventional management thinking and practices in a dog - eat - dog, transactional business world, not enough leaders spend the time to do what Watson had to learn over his many years at Chevron: Getting results through the people and relationship side of the business.
The wealthiest and most successful people know that the keys to any negotiation are threefold: First, understand what the other side really wants.
According to McGonigal, the appeal of SuperBetter (which is played by 125,000 people worldwide) is that unlike many medications that treat such conditions, it has no side effects — and people always want to see what works better than current protocols.
Often when a person changes circumstances, he or she quickly forgets what it's like on the other side.
Whether you become a cosmetologist so you can help people feel beautiful, or you become a business consultant who inspires people to reach their dreams, a side hustle may be just what you need to feel a sense of purpose.
They do what they can to keep their side of the street clean instead of reactively blaming their problems on people or circumstances outside of themselves.
Someone once told me that usually when people are arguing, and they can't see the other side, people argue about the what and the why.
People have to look at the side of their screen, which usually is something they do only after they're not able to find what they're looking for.
If you're not sure what the person on the other side of the table really needs, it becomes an uphill battle to find the opening that will convince them to bankroll your project.
«We believe in giving people a voice, which means erring on the side of letting people share what they want whenever possible,» he wrote in a post on his Facebook page.
Cable news, no matter what channel you're watching, has devolved into putting multiple people onscreen while they see who can talk the loudest and longest without ever recognizing that the person on the other side of the split screen may have a point.
(On a side note, what's up with these people who have 3,000 Facebook friends?)
«We really tried to see what makes people tick on all sides of this, that was really important to us,» co-creator Drew Dowdle said.
«It might seem like I built my business overnight, but what people don't know is that on the marketing side, It took me years of building a network of food writers, chefs, magazine editors, and other people in the industry,» echoes Luuvu Hoang, founder of Txiki Plaka restaurant.
My pair skewed a bit on the skinny side, so people can make of that what they will.
A wise people, seeing the situation for what it truly is, would grapple with these harsh truths, determine a way to stop fighting literally on the other side of the world, and seek a settlement, not as victors, but as an honorable people.
On the leadership side, we're looking at what makes people successful leaders and how can we cultivate that.
Allowed me to take the emotion side out and stopped chasing what a lot of people speculated and instead helped me make educational and analytical decisions.
On the positive side, it also allows you to see specifically what people are talking about at your business.
[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetwhat you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetWhat people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetwhat to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetWhat the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetWhat are the overarching principles that bind us together?
Don't take my word for it, let's see what other people (on the buy side) are saying about the state of sales development today.
So, generally, the biggest deltas are, one, a little bit weaker on the handset side; two, a little more conservative modeling of what happens later in the year than what we had, which frankly is not, again, just to drive that point home, nobody knows how many people are going to buy a new handset when it's launched on the market — not us, not our customers, not analysts, or you name it.
I just was sort of interested and talked to a lot of people about what was going on, but I wasn't really interested in looking at the business side of it, so I never was doing that.
The lead designer on the project, Markus McKenna, worked with Steelcase to construct what McKenna refers to as a «cocoon - like space»; a three sided set of privacy screens that work together to obstruct peripheral vision and help block out the sound and vision of people traffic around it.
That war shows what people are capable of doing... on each side of the spectrum.
Both people of faith and atheists should stop worrying about what the other side believes and just follow your own beliefs.
But I am okay, and if people believe that is going to be all good once they are Christians, what they will probably find is that life will get hard and seem impossible regardless, but somehow in the mix, after we are spit out the other side of the tough stuff, we notice He is still there, and in «that» there is hope.
Churches warn people about the dangers of education oneself least they discover that what their ministers have been telling them is deceptively one - sided.
I wonder what would happen over there if the world's people were to finally see the truth and realize that religion is being used to delude them into thinking world wars are the way of life — something that has to happen in order for... their glorious ascension into heaven or hell --(depending on who's side — re: religion — god — whatever — you are on).
This is the thing: when you start to hit 28 or 30, everything starts to divide, and you can see very clearly two kinds of people: on one side, people who have used their 20s to learn and grow, to find God and themselves and their deep dreams, people who know what works and what doesn't, who have pushed through to become real live adults.
What Fermi wrought in physics, and what Watson and Crick made possible in the new genetics, are accomplishments that most serious people recognize as having potential shadow - sides: nuclear warfare, in the one case; a brave new world of manufactured and stunted humanity in the otWhat Fermi wrought in physics, and what Watson and Crick made possible in the new genetics, are accomplishments that most serious people recognize as having potential shadow - sides: nuclear warfare, in the one case; a brave new world of manufactured and stunted humanity in the otwhat Watson and Crick made possible in the new genetics, are accomplishments that most serious people recognize as having potential shadow - sides: nuclear warfare, in the one case; a brave new world of manufactured and stunted humanity in the other.
How sad to claim to be a chaplain and not be able to tell a dying patient anything about the specifics on the other side of the veil; what will happen to a person who has died, what they will be doing, what is the exact nature of God and those who depart from this life.
Because what I just described is not a fantasy institution — it is the real Wheaton College that so few people know about, as difficult for many to imagine as a round square or a four - sided triangle.
Vic On the opposite side of the spectrum lies fascism, which is what many people fear the Tea Party will lead America.
I'm sorry if you are so incompetent to take what he says seriously and people base their votes on his input, that is their problem, there are really stupid people on both sides of the isle.
Considering some of the flack people are posting, I guess this is a sort of article like what I was hoping to see, but the ridiculousness of a Jewish FB clone called «FaceGlat» is sort of on the lame side.
And then, when it's your turn, and you end up on your ass with a cracked tailbone, you start asking what kind of pain killers these people are taking and if there are any side effects.
What I can't imagine is people like Dement and Kyl expressing love and respect for leaders on the other side, like Pelosi and Reid.
After all, these are people who I walked alongside as we talked of love and forgiveness and reconciliation... But what kind of reconciliation is it to choose one side because they are more beneficial to you, having the skills you need to promote your own agenda, while leaving the person on the other side lying in the dirt?
People are not asking her what happened and they don't even want her side of anything because the one with position and power spoke.
In the graciousness of the book (something often lacking when people engage Emergent, no names but...), in its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to read.
It is adorable though that you have some sympathy for Hitler, I'm sure you're going to fall on the right side of history this time, because for the lat 60 years you've got the shaft, what with the whole wanting to kill people and hating on others.
But the theological error that underlies this idealization of violence leads them into a new, a sociopolitical Manicheanism which (like the earlier, metaphysical Manicheanism) is also an idealism, a simplifying resource to help people participate in a complicated world where, they know, they had better do what the powers that be recommend and take sides.
A person on the other side, or who hasn't made up his or her mind on an issue, observes a protest and asks: «If they win, what would it be like to live in a community in which their side is ascendant?»
Its just plan stupid and a waste of time, if you believe in god or buddah or allah or anyother good thats great for you and if you do not believe in a god thats great too, Whats one big problem that i cant understand is why people are so narrow minded on both sides of the specturm and even within different religions.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z