Sentences with phrase «side crash tests without»
But don't be surprised to find that most cars fare poorly in side crash tests without side - impact airbags.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/ Not exact matches
Cons: Fuel economy, turning radius, poor crash test scores without side airbags.
Cons: Road noise, models without side airbags scored poorly in side impact crash tests, no trunk release on the remote, some interior materials are not of top quality (e.g. carpet).
In the side - impact crash tests, the 2004 - 2008 models without side airbags received three stars for both the front and the rear seat.
In the side - impact crash tests, the 2003 - 2006 Mazda 6 without side airbags received three stars for the front and four stars for the rear passenger protection.
Rewind to 2004, and you'll discover that North American crash tests saw similar discrepancies, when vehicles were tested without side airbags as standard equipment.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) rated the 2002 - 2006 Toyota Camry «Good» for frontal crash protection, however models without optional side airbags received «Poor» rating in side crash test.
A week ago the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety released results of its crash tests on small SUVs and basically found that vehicles with side air bags provide a lot more security than those without them.
The impact tests performed by IIHS is considered severe and is a very reliable testing method to determine what good side protection is required for the driver and the passenger to survive this severe crash without inflicting serious injuries.