In somewhat the same vein, put up a hand if you're in favour of a new rule of lawyer's professional conduct which states that lawyers acting for the winning
side in a law suit are allowed to comment on the merits of the result for the media — print, electronic, and otherwise — only if the lawyers concede, on the record, that the decision is wrong on the facts and the law, and that they were surprised (nay, astonished, flabbergasted, etc) that any of their arguments were accepted by the judge.
Not exact matches
Principals can collectively play a key role
in the shaping of such
laws, but individually, the judicial odds generally depend on which
side of the
suit the principal is.
Would you hire your spouse's Attorney
in a divorce battle, or if someone brought a
law suit against you would you hire the opposing
side's attorney, hell no!
«On the Other
Side of the
Law», Yazan Khalili's first solo exhibition in Dubai, follows suit in visibilising the fine line between taking advantage of loop holes in the law and universal notions of justice in the highly contested contexts of settler coloniali
Law», Yazan Khalili's first solo exhibition
in Dubai, follows
suit in visibilising the fine line between taking advantage of loop holes
in the
law and universal notions of justice in the highly contested contexts of settler coloniali
law and universal notions of justice
in the highly contested contexts of settler colonialism.
On the solicitor
side, it leads to desperate fee cutting leading to corner cutting and incompetence (assuredly not mitigated, but worsened, by the evil of title insurance), while on the barrister
side it leads to churning and dragging out, often unreasonably, of files and engaging
in ever more frivolous
law suits.
As a
side note, the
suit was filed by the
law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, which specializes
in litigation, is representing Motorola against Apple on multiple fronts, and is known for its closeness to Google and long - standing relationship with IBM.
The personal injury lawyers at the McArthur
Law Firm are an experienced and aggressive legal team you want on your
side in a dram shop liability
suit, because they provide several benefits, including:
In civil cases such as personal injury or medical malpractice, depositions occur during the discovery phase, which is the period of time after the
law suit is filed and the initial papers are exchanged between the two
sides.
Both
sides involved
in a
law suit must attend the mediation.
So, what the learned, but possibly biased (remember, the 50/50 rule pro or con here) Judge has publicly stated as reasoning for the continuance of Dale's
suit is,
in «my» own words, that... «In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s
in «my» own words, that... «
In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s
In my mind (according to how I personally see things
in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s
in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the
law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s
in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both
sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s
in this dispute,
side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s):