Sentences with phrase «side is in question»

Though some of the factors may differ depending on which side is in question, it's safe to say that each party has their fair share of stressors.

Not exact matches

«After years in which Republicans were more confident than Democrats in debating gun - control questions, the issue now energizes each side's coalition,» political analyst Ron Brownstein wrote in the National Journal in January.

And, on the flip side, if you know you are materially better than your competitors in certain areas the customer desires, answer questions with answers you know will far outshine those of your competitors.

One school of thought says she should just plow ahead with her environmental agenda; history will be on her side in the end, since no one today (outside of maybe a few U.S. Republicans) doubts that the question of phasing out fossil fuels is not a matter of if but when.

Going PC by PC to retrieve e-mail in the event of a lawsuit is time consuming and expensive — and if you can't produce relevant e-mail because it was accidentally deleted, the other side could use it to raise the question of whether you maliciously deleted things you didn't want them to find, Larrivee says.

«There are going to be tough questions on both sides, questions the Supreme Court has not directly answered before in cases, that this court may not hesitate to stay clear of,» says Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at University of California, Los Angeles.

Many politicians on both sides of the aisle are raising questions about Facebook following revelations about its role in the 2016 election and, more recently, in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

In a sometimes heated exchange with reporters shouting questions, Trump said, «You also had people that were very fine people on both sides.»

And they are useful in figuring out what the other side's logic is — meaning that you should ask questions even when you think you know the answer.

The company is facing questions from lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic about how it handles personal user data after a pair of weekend reports by The Observer newspaper in the U.K. and The New York Times alleged research firm Cambridge Analytica improperly gained access to the data of more than 50 million Facebook users.

But, with criticism of the media from all sides continuing to mount in the wake of the election, the question is: will networks like CNN reshape their political and election coverage going forward?

She goes on to offer general but valuable advice like «gather good information» and «anchor with options,» but the real goldmine in her piece might just be a side bar in which she tackles the most fundamental question of all — what exactly do you say to get what you want?

The jury does pay attention to witnesses when they're in the witness chair, not only on the substantive responses to a question but the body language, the demeanor, and how they respond to cross examination by the other side's lawyer.

In that regard it is a pity that Conservative MPs on the ethics committee were apparently uninterested in hearing from Mr. Wright, but then there are still two questions on the order paper that the government side might deign to respond to before the House rises for the summeIn that regard it is a pity that Conservative MPs on the ethics committee were apparently uninterested in hearing from Mr. Wright, but then there are still two questions on the order paper that the government side might deign to respond to before the House rises for the summein hearing from Mr. Wright, but then there are still two questions on the order paper that the government side might deign to respond to before the House rises for the summer.

And while there is no legal requirement that underwriters like Mr. Thiel reveal their involvement to the opposing side or the jury, it is considered fair game for lawyers to ask questions about financial backing — something that Gawker Media did on Wednesday in court as part of its efforts to overturn the Hogan judgment.

The top question in investors» minds is, according to the sell - side firm: what»...

In Question Period, Deputy Premier Carole James said, «Well, it's incredible to hear the other side and the rhetoric that is coming forward.

If we assume that hysteresis is in fact present to some degree after deep recessions, the natural next question is to ask whether it might be possible to reverse these adverse supply - side effects by temporarily running a «high - pressure economy,» with robust aggregate demand and a tight labor market.

Adena Friedman, Chief Executive Officer of Nasdaq, in a televised interview with CNBC was questioned about the decision taken by Nasdaq's board and the side she believes on these cryptocurrencies, particularly as a service provider.

In fact, there have been several times when the prices have tried to break through either side of the range but each and everytime, there has been a failure which brings us to the question of what, if anything at all, could bring about a breakout in the rangIn fact, there have been several times when the prices have tried to break through either side of the range but each and everytime, there has been a failure which brings us to the question of what, if anything at all, could bring about a breakout in the rangin the range.

The question of women's ordination is regarded as church - dividing, at least from the Orthodox angle... Consequently I think we on the Lutheran side have to think about whether progress in dialogue is to be expected at all.»

One side will look down on him for acknowledging faith and the other will question any Christian who is not in church every Sunday.

Well, it goes back to the same question: Since both sides and their fans all generally pray to the same God for victory, is making an obvious point of thanking God for favoring your team because of your better performance just rubbing it in, thus const.ituting poor sportsmanship?

The problem is that their «Jesus» doesn't ask them any hard questions; but is more like a child's «invisible friend» who is always on thier side whenever they find themselves in a conflict with others.

The question now is whether there is any point of contact on the side of liberation theology for the concerns of process theologians in areas to which liberation theologians have paid less attention.

The other problem I think (and this is not the result of the manic depressive side of my profession as someone who works in «Asile» (refuge), an organisation dealing with migrants) is that we must add to the central preoccupations of our thinking the question of refugees and asylum.

So, in that case, the question is about how much of the gender difference is nature versus nurture, and I tend to fall on the side of nurture.

Browning does not disown the recent past, but without question he wants to go beyond the stance that he and Oden shared then: «The preoccupation with therapeutic acceptance and Christian forgiveness characteristic of the 1960s, especially of the work of Paul Tillich, Seward Hiltner, Daniel Day Williams, Thomas Oden and myself, was not so much wrong as one - sided in its emphasis» (p. 104).

Questions such as whether torture is permissible in Tolkien's world view, whether war is glorified (with a side - debate about how the films differ from the books in this respect), and how victory and defeat are characterised, are worth considering and will encourage readers to think more deeply about LOTR and appreciate how nuanced Tolkien's treatment of these issues is.

If employing the suggested possibilities would actually help Ogden with his stated intention of being more adequate to the «objective» side of faith assertions about Jesus, and if these possibilities are inherent in the process philosophy which Ogden employs, the question raises itself as to why Ogden has not developed his position along the suggested lines.

We Catholics, however, should like to be allowed to ask one pertinent question about the whole problem of ecumenism, not in order to manoeuvre the other side into an unfavourable position, but because it simply can not be avoided.

On the pluralism side, the proposal here is, quite simply, that a theological course of study would be much more adequate to the «pluralism of pluralisms» characterizing the Christian thing if every course in it were deliberately and explicitly designed to address one of the three questions invited by Christian congregations and the array of types of congregations were broad and rich.

Since these three ideas are now identified as within the spectrum of legitimate Christian belief, a Mormon can hope that, the next time the question is raised in these pages, these three beliefs held by the Latter - day Saints will be moved from the down side to the plus side of the answer.

On the unity side, the proposal here is, quite simply, that a theological course of study would be unified if every course in it were deliberately and explicitly designed to address centrally one of the three questions about the Christian thing in and as Christian congregations (What is it?

The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.

Whether in private conversation, group discussion, a sermon or a speech, or in the interaction within the community, the question is whether there is, on the one side, conviction about what the gospel means and, on the other side, unqualified readiness to hear the other people and see the world from their point of view.

The question of how to reconcile indiscriminate and all - embracing love with siding with the oppressed is one that Douglass gave attention to in his May 12,1846 speech at Finsbury Chapel in Moorfield, England.

The titles of the biographies of Christian boxers, God in My Corner (George Foreman; Thomas Nelson) and Holyfield: the Humble Warrior (Evander Holyfield; Thomas Nelson), raise a whole host of questions, not least whether God can really be on a particular boxer's side in a fight.

To yet another side, or perhaps underneath all these issues, lie the questions of value: whether reality exhibits worth independent of interpretation, whether interpretation inevitably is valuation, whether political life which contests values is a struggle about reality or about the intentions in interpretations or merely about getting along socially.

It's not just life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»?

As the author notes in the beginning, this volume is not intended as a homily, but rather as a companion; and like a trusted companion, it does not simply conduct a one - sided soliloquy over history and texts, but behaves dynamically: telling stories, empathizing with human frailty, and anticipating questions.

Looking at this side of the ambiguity, we see a church in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its due; a church where changing jobs for the sake of peace and justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.

Then building on these two chapters side by side, in the next two chapters I will draw out what happens when theological schooling is focused through the lens or within the horizon of questions about congregations.

A temporary victory has been declared in a part of the debate conducted on the terms of the other side» the question of utility.

Such questions are basic to understanding a Biblical position regarding women in the church and family and are answered variously by each side in the debate.

fishon: i could repeat all the questions, but in your preferred forms... example: «Is it possible to dwell together without one or the other side making you choose a side?»

Therefore two prehensions may have the same spatio - temporal standpoint but still differ if the subjects in question differ in the unity of their subjective immediacies.73 But though in this he sides with Cobb, Ford faults Cobb on the very point Wilcox raises.74 For while God, in Cobb's view, is omnispatial, he is not omnitemporal.

In traditional Christian faith there is no hesitation in affirming constantly that a «word» has been sent to us, that things are not one - sided, that our questions and pleas are not projected into a vacuuIn traditional Christian faith there is no hesitation in affirming constantly that a «word» has been sent to us, that things are not one - sided, that our questions and pleas are not projected into a vacuuin affirming constantly that a «word» has been sent to us, that things are not one - sided, that our questions and pleas are not projected into a vacuum.

question by Sinsinawa Dominican Sister Erica Jordan, who not - so - subtly suggested that Ryan's approach to healthcare reform, tax reform, and welfare reform was in conflict with the Church's social teaching, the very Catholic Speaker replied that he completely agreed with Sister Erica that God is «always on the side of the poor and dispossessed»; the real question was, how do public officials, who are not God, create public policies that empower the poor and dispossessed to be not - poor and not - dispossessed?

On the other side of the question, we hear, even today, that most gay men are not really interested in marriage.