Sentences with phrase «side of a disagreement»

They are not designed to support one side of a disagreement about the nature and purposes of theological schools against the other side.

Any person casually acquainted with the theories of conflict studies and research knows that when individuals or groups in conflict do not have credible facts to defend their side of disagreement or conflict issues, they resort to odious personal attacks and / or the assassination of the character, honour and integrity of their opponents as a cover for their inability to rebut the objective issue in conflict.

The Interpersonal Reactivity Index, a well - known questionnaire, taps empathy by asking whether responders agree to statements such as «I often have tender, concerned feelings for people less fortunate than me» and «I try to look at everybody's side of a disagreement before I make a decision.»

Be willing to laugh together and see the funny side of your disagreement, even if you're angry, too.

The Perspective Taking subscale measures the cognitive tendency to adopt another's psychological perspective (7 items; «I try to look at everybody's side of a disagreement before I make a decision»).

Not exact matches

«As another of the government's self - imposed deadlines for securing a deal slipped away, disagreements between the two sides on budget targets persisted,» is another one of those sentences about the Greek crisis that could have been written almost any Monday over the past few months, and that you'll probably read again next Monday.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

There are disagreements in which both sides have a plausible case, but there is no plausible case to be made that Benedict, a man of genteel and old - fashioned liberality, is a fanatic and extremist.

Regarding the events of the last few weeks... this is about as balanced of a summary you are going to find when you are faced with a disagreement and one side refuses to speak and instead tries to actively repress the speech of the other.

Rebecca Solnit is frustrated that so many liberals are letting occasional policy disagreements blind them to the fact that Obama is the only candidate who's even trying to be on their side, which to her mind should earn him at least a little bit of loyalty and ideological slack - cutting.

Disagreements arose about what the Bible actually taught, until eventually, both sides of a doctrinal debate condemned and excommunicated their opponents.

A tenet of Nord's theory holds that a neutral government must never take «sides on matters of profound disagreement» within the nation.

This season Aubameyang has still being scoring well for the German side, but he had his disagreements and had been suspended by the club for missing training before one of our games.

One area of disagreement, however; although I am a side sleeper, I find the side lying position uncomfortable for nursing.

We can search for areas of agreement, firm up the consensus, and then see if the remaining areas of disagreement could be put to one side for a moment while we pursue them.

Disagreement among the sector on de Blasio's new charter effort is sure to be a welcome side effect of the speech for the de Blasio administration.

For all their disagreements, scientists on both sides of the fracking debate agree that it is very unlikely that microfracturing of rock formation itself contributes to the vertical migration of gases.

Despite disagreements with Church doctrine, Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer sides with the Vatican on one issue: the right of Catholic pharmacists to refuse to dispense birth control.

If someone at work you are trying to date and you described to them about your STD you know that there is the probability entire office in the final analysis to explain minute you will obtain to the poor sides of this face or the disagreement.

The first half concerns Brooklyn high - school student Chantel (Ariyan Johnson) as she deals with academic disagreements with her teachers (at one point getting into shouting match about the Holocaust), takes advantage of her boyfriend's wallet to go on a shopping spree, and confronts yuppies in the Upper West Side gourmet shop where she works.

After the briefest of introductions to flesh out which side everyone is on, the deal swiftly goes south over a minor disagreement.

From where I sit, though, most of this sense - making (at least in the world of education) has felt one - sided, pedantic, and uninterested in exploring honest disagreements or seeking ways to bridge them.

But the partisan nature of the disagreement makes it unlikely that the sides will compromise,...

Also, her mother's lack of support for Zelda, seeming to take Scott's side in most of their disagreements.

One of the main advantages of science is that it can show disagreement (just remember the bet on black holes by Hawking and Kip Thorne) and be proud of it, as long as both sides are willing to give in on superior arguments and evidence.

It's like when both sides blame the «MSM» for creating public opinions with which they are in disagreement with, when they can't even quantify the impact of the «MSM» on public opinion.

If it is «settle (as in a disagreement)...», then I would think there is no hope of this unless the key players from «either side» are present.

Though, to be fair, there are rarely just two sides to a scientific disagreement: interpreting data can be tricky and nuanced, and oftentimes a certain amount of expert judgment is required.

I've only read a subset of a subset of the papers and am not qualified to comment on much of the science, but where there is so much disagreement, from well qualified people on all sides, then there is obviously a problem in applying any of it to public policy.

However, my main reason for raising this is that when acting as a «normal» Expert, one of the requirements in most cases is an Experts meeting with my counterpart on the other side of the case, which is designed to produce an agreed document that highlights points of agreement and points of disagreement (and a short summary of why there is disagreement on these points).

(I'm not saying here that we ARE right, but to judge the disagreement would take a level of understanding GREATER than the people on the two sides.)

The fact that «skeptics» make that argument over and over and over is a stain on the noble cause of skepticism (that said, no doubt the similar claim that disagreement = «diversion» can be found on the other side of the fence).

In equating disagreement with lack of integrity, he offers a prime example of what is broken in the climate debate, with folks on both sides working from an assumption that their opponents have deeply flawed, even evil motives.

I think some of the violent disagreements over V&V here and at RC come from each side not understanding what formal V&V is for.

But it provides the onlooker with an excellent overview of both sides of whatever debate, argument, discussion, disagreement etc is taking place.

Disagreements often arise over breach of contract (i.e., one party did not keep its side of the bargain), but other areas breed disagreements as well, such as real estate, unfair business practices, or intellectDisagreements often arise over breach of contract (i.e., one party did not keep its side of the bargain), but other areas breed disagreements as well, such as real estate, unfair business practices, or intellectdisagreements as well, such as real estate, unfair business practices, or intellectual property.

One possibility is that when we are presented with comments from experts on either side of an issue, we produce a mental representation of the disagreement that takes the form of one person on either side, which somehow contaminates our impression of the distribution of opinions in the larger population of experts.

Do not give your side of the story, do not explain yourself, do not blame the accuser, and do not even admit to knowing the accuser or having had an argument or disagreement with him or her.

Breach of contract is perhaps the most common form of business dispute and typically involves a disagreement as to whether one side or the other to a contract has properly performed its contractual duties or, perhaps, whether one party has been excused from performance by acts of the other party.

One thing that has been at the heart of these long and painful discussions is the disagreement between the parties involved, but from the side of the Indian government.

For many reasons including cost, consider a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution that keeps you out of the courtroom, but still allows both sides to work through disagreements.

In the case of disagreement the two reviewers discussed the paper and came to a final decision on inclusion / exclusion, erring on the side of inclusion where no easy agreement could be reached.