Sentences with phrase «side of argument without»

Unlike simple argumentative essay, which argues only one point of view, this type presents both sides of the argument without author appealing to any of the sides.

The result of promoting both sides of the argument without equal validation has only created a sense of confusion, fear and helplessness.

Not exact matches

I said what I said for anyone willing to listen to both sides of the fence and weigh the arguments without preconceived bias.

Earlier writers had recognized that Volkmar went too far in his attempted demonstration of Mark's dependence upon Paul — he found evidence of such dependence on almost every page of the Gospel — but his view was such a welcome relief from the one - sided Tübingen theory, according to which Mark was a «neutral» in the great apostolic controversy over Jewish Christianity, that the main thesis of Volkmar was accepted without careful scrutiny of his supporting arguments.

You are right in your definition of the principle of debate, but that's why we get nowhere with many serious issues of the world, we debate and argue without thought or understanding of the other side, we just learn enough to put together arguments against others.

But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.

My argument is if we were as prolific as the other side, such statistics that suggest we are moving the ball around without getting close to put in in the back of the net is unsettling.

Many AP writers articulate their arguments without being critical of the «other» side.

If you can't ask a question without including an irrelevant and nonsense «the other side» argument, you should add a source or more information; as it stands, the actions of the NAACP do not match your quotes.

From the other side came the argument, Without troops in Iraq, there would be a 30 percent higher chance of terrorists entering the U.S.

The other side of the argument holds more true: You can go without ever replacing your oil if you frequently replace your filter.

It is up to the reader to decide, and without spoiling anything, suffice to say that there's plenty of evidence for both sides of the argument.

but in an american audience, you can't get past the titillation and gender / feminist oppression because the argument is invalid without sex coming into a discussion and becoming filtered on one side of a long standing argument that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

But the other side of that argument is that without the DLC option (and extra revenue incentive) there would be no extra content to speak of.

For other indicators — glacial retreat, sea level, arctic ice extent, etc. — the data is equally noisy, and it is difficult having a sensible discussion without the inevitable cherry - picking on both sides of the argument.

Does this not invite the question in return: Aren't there two sides to that argument, and if so, why is the text presenting this as a matter of fact without giving both sides their due?

Newspaper reporters are just as guilty of canvassing «both sides» of every argument, often without providing any critical judgment as to the validity or relative weight of either side.

And certainly, a mere acknowledgement that there is a debate, without actually a review of the arguments establishing the quality of the debate, let alone that side A is equally strong if not stronger than side B, a mere statement that an argument exists would not be inspirational to me.

They falsely cast the debate as opposed sides, without any nuance of argument or position.

Jan P Perlw1tz There is some lack of honesty on your side, if you make some innuendo with respect to statements by me, but refuse to substantiate and to be specific, and so leaving me without any chance to examine the validity of your hidden argument.

People often dismiss individual arguments and evidence against their preferred position without considering the cumulative weight of the other side's points.

Maybe judith should go over there and insist that they stick to their guns, since she found their argument compelling earlier, without having bothered to look into Steig's side of the story.

It pushes the rhetoric and arguments to one side or the other - by necessity, since the tendency is for each side to engage in greater and greater bombast until those of us in the middle have a hard time being heard as neutral without being cast to one side or the other, because all people know is either extreme.

I'm sure there are arguments to be made for both sides, but it's true that a law school can't flourish without the endorsement of its institution.

Without delving into and trying to rebut all of the arguments on the other side, I'd simply make the following three points:

An important part of a judge, or an ombudsman's job is to help the parties to understand that they actually comprehend their side of the argument — without this, it is difficult to gain their trust and respect.

there have been competing theories, promulgated by both sides of the issue which could not be dismissed either on due process principles or perception arguments, without proper forensic analysis.

I which case there is, you are guilty (there is no burden of proof on either side), and guilty even though proven innocent (the no smoke without fire argument and although not a legal system it is a societal one)

From there, one must learn to discuss possible positive outcomes and promote compromise; no conflict can be fully resolved without each side of the argument making concessions, so it is important to lead each side down the path toward understanding by making them recognize concessions must be made.

When couples make a habit of engaging in destructive arguments without processing or trying to understand their partner's side of things, the conflicts build on each other until they become unmanageable and overwhelming.

While there may some merit in both sides of the argument, a recent divorce case in South Africa pushed the definition of an uncontested divorce past the limits of sensibility when a woman who thought she was married found out her husband had divorced her without her knowledge.

Finances This may be one of the hottest influencers that pushes agents to commit to working with or without a team, and there are strong arguments for both sides.