Not exact matches
There's always a
right and a
wrong side of every street,
and before you rent your retail space, stand out front
and count how many people walk by the door.
Even if you believe God is vanishingly unlikely to exist, the consequence
of being
wrong (Hell) is so great,
and the benefits
of being
right (not having to go to church on Sundays) so comparatively miniscule, that you should probably just believe in God to be on the safe
side.
If Jews want, for instance, to respond to the internal Christian debate over the possibility
of salvation for non-Christians, then it is perfectly fair to announce that according to Judaism, one
side of that Christian debate is
right and the other
wrong.
And it has often been the case, where race is involved, that the Christians on the
wrong side of history have outnumbered those on the
right side.
When the later Judaism saw in retrospect this conflict between prophetic ideals
and popular religion, it was clear that the social solidarity
of the nation had been on the
wrong side of the issue
and that Jeremiah, in his courageous
and sacrificial isolation, had been
right.
That shows us once
and for all that there is no
right or
wrong side of history, but only
of truth.
Christians like you in American history has always been on the
wrong side of civil
rights and morality.
That's fine Jerry, you just stick to your hatred, bigotry
and ignorance... so what if you're on the
wrong side of history... as long as you have the
right to be a hateful, bigoted ignoramus, that's all that counts.
They're on the
wrong side of history when it comes to gay
rights and a womens
right to choose
and they'll pay for it big time in 2012!
They insist that they are objectively
right,
and if you don't conform to their ideas, you are on the
wrong side of history.
Even if we can not know the answer to all
of society's ills, even if we can not pretend to know how to solve the problems
of crime
and drugs
and inflation
and poverty, we can still proclaim that it is obviously
and unquestionably a moral
wrong to maintain a penal system based on vengeance instead
of rehabilitation; to allow human
rights violations to go unchallenged (on either
side of the iron curtain); to waste vast quantities
of food
and resources while others are malnourished
and sick
and poor; or to allow so many children in our own midst to go through childhood unwanted
and unloved
and even abused.
Many, regardless
of which
side their beliefs fall on, are driven by the innate human need to be
right and seek to support their belief by proving the other
side wrong.
You sound just like the people in the dark ages did when they were against civil
rights for African Americans
and women, you're the one on the
wrong side of the moral debate with no facts to back yourselves up.
Late in the year they wrote
of the recent conflict in Europe, «We may not be ready yet to say that we did the
wrong thing in going in on the
side of what we thought was democracy, decency
and the
rights of men.
ok, ok, ok, i get it both
sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence
of god... one
side believe the other doesn't what's
wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds
and one
side will believe
and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe
right???
All I know is both
sides of the house are equally guilty
of «proving» the other
wrong and not being able to prove themselves
right.
The current game
of «Capture the Flag» is a case in point, with one
side arguing «my country
right or
wrong»
and the other
side arguing «America: change it or lose it.»
I written why I thought the authors post has failed in logic, I may be
wrong but I did say that a
Right sided AM or a player who could play their for us would be more
of a logical choice when looking at Wenger
and the type
of players he likes to buy.
Arsenal have been on the
right and wrong side of some examples
of this over the years, such as the timing
of David Ospina's calanity in the Champions League this season which snatched the momentum form us
and gave it straight back to Olympiacos just after Theo Walcott had given Arsenal a huge shot in the arm.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug
and play» mentality where players play out
of position
and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined
and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin
and Gibbs
and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline
and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing
and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the
right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often
and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield
and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the
wrong times
and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in
and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis
and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka
and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving
and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space
and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel
and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott
and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch
and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended
and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long
and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy
and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally,
and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient
and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills
and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this
side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018
and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up
and say i was
wrong this morning for giving wenger stick
and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light
of day
and had a chance to reevaluate the situation
and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back
and work his magic on welbeck
and get him scoring goals
and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine
and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that
side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the
right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas
and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one
of those wenger gems that he finds
and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m
and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet
and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature
of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the
right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black
and white for all to see
and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc
and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on
and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all
Cech is not good with Pennos, top top professional but in guessing the
right way he is always
wrong, he shimmies a little to one or both
sides and then can not go full stretch to the
side of his choice,
and he never waits long enough to see if it's coming straight down the barrel.
Watch out Goonsqad, Charlie is gonna say Ya
wrong mentioning Le Coq again is the best DM this season.Im with you as most fans agree he is the best this season
and all we need is a
Right sided player like Milner
of City CB
We do not know if this little nugget
of an Arsenal transfer rumour is actually
right, but after Arsene Wenger signed a central midfielder Mohamed Elneny in the January transfer window
and with the three current Arsenal players in question being generally on the fringe
of the first team
and being on the
wrong side of the maghic 30 - year old mark I would say there is definitely something in it.
Key individuals
right across the team are approaching or are already on the
wrong side of 30, namely Gerard Pique, Sergio Busquets, Javier Mascherano, Andres Iniesta, Luis Suarez
and Lionel Messi.
Its Not really as simple as everyone thinks Wenger has done really collosal things at the club
and should rightly be feted as one
of our greatest managers, HOWEVER over the last three or four years his persona
and his ability have declined rapidly yet he still belives that he is
right and and the whole
of the rest
of the footballing world are
wrong, last summer even the hated
and loathed Adrian Durham stated that all Wenger needed was three key players to turn the squad into the PL winning
side it should be, that was a keeper, a CDM
and a world class striker.
At
right back, it was the 19 - year old Timothy Fosu - Mensah that started in place
of second - choice Mateo Darmian
and the Dutchman hardly put a foot
wrong and often supported the
side with aggressive forward runs.
I really hope that the OX turns out to be a great buy
and I'm proven
wrong as I'm not a fan
of this guy
and not sure How he improves our
side as I'm hearing he wanted Liverpool because he wants to play the CM role where as Chelsea would play him as a wing back??? So let me get this
right as been a busy few days for our club??
At
right back Jenkinson put over some consistent crosses
and got forward well considering, Defensively he was caught on the
wrong side of his attacker
and gave the ball away to often when making a simple pass.
There was little
wrong with Tottenham's performance against the Belgian
side, even after Dele Alli's rush
of blood saw him sent off, but manager Mauricio Pochettino was
right in saying the damage was done in the first leg in Belgium — a 1 - 0 defeat where Spurs were complacent
and disinterested.
Grimshaw had already been called into action by Chong before the young keeper produced an outstanding save to deny Boonen
and then lady luck was on his
side as Zachary Dearnley beat him, only to see his effort go the
wrong of the
right post.
I don't care who is
right or
wrong in your great moral catfight, but I'm starting to think the Dr. on the other
side must be a hell
of alot smarter than you because she is keeping her mouth shut
and not chasing every little blog mention trying to score points in the court
of public opinion to keep herself looking important.
Making your own bias tape, knowing
right side from
wrong side of ribbing fabric
and so much more...
and you end up with a great towel bib that doesn't need to go over the baby's head.
Media can have too much power sometimes, remember they are not always an impartial voice
of the world, they are usually telling it from one
side's prospective, with that
side's opinions
and views (
right or
wrong).
The exact color
of an heirloom tomato, the latest Chloris pattern is just sexy on the
right side and wrong.
If someone has the power to say that on this controversial question,
side A is
right and side B is
wrong and therefore anyone in Congress arguing in favor
of side B is guilty
of a crime
and will be sent to prison, clearly the people who have this power are the ones who are really in control
of the government.
He is
of course
right to suggest that their position puts then firmly on the
wrong side of the argument
and interestingly suggests that on this particular matter,
and welfare reform in general the public are ahead
of the politicians.
While they are quite well aligned with their voters, who on ICM's poll averaged at 27, they are both a long way from the political centre,
and on the «
wrong side»
of their voters, i.e. Conservative voters consider their party to be further to the
right than themselves.
The public spat that ensued saw either
side of the divide supporting their favourites as being in the
right and condemning the other
side as those who did
wrong.
«That seems to me wholly
wrong and I have agreed now with the Lord Chancellor that his plans to restrict the application
of the European Convention on Human
Rights will apply to the military
side as well.
In the past three years, Siena polling has shown support for marriage equality growing from 43 % in 2007 to 46 % last year to 53 % this year
and opposition dropping from 47 % in 2007 to 40 % last year to just 39 % now... It's time for State Senators who still aren't with us to look at these results
and ask themselves this simple question: «Do I want to be on the
right side of history or the
wrong side of history when the story is written about how marriage equality came to New York State»?»
And while my career is evolving through various detours and side - steps, at the end of the day I believe we make all our career choices work for us — there is no right or wrong answ
And while my career is evolving through various detours
and side - steps, at the end of the day I believe we make all our career choices work for us — there is no right or wrong answ
and side - steps, at the end
of the day I believe we make all our career choices work for us — there is no
right or
wrong answer.
Flip the pattern over
and pin it,
wrong side up, to a single thickness
of the
right side of your backing fabric.
I find when I openly share my experience versus giving him direct advice, he then has the space to discern
and learn for himself what is
right or
wrong and how he can act so that he is on the
right side of the equation.»
Place the backing fabric, such as batiste, on the
wrong side of the wool fabric,
and the paper pattern on the
right side.
With the
right razor, you can balance
and achieve the fine lines on which these parameters reside, or, with the
wrong razor, come out on the
side of knicked, bumped,
and irritated.
As lovers, Pascal
and Moll represent a union that's familiar to films
and literature: a forging
of the
wrong and right sides of the tracks.
Even if the filmmaker
and the titular exiled former spy very well end up on the
right side of history someday, Stone's film is one -
sided, unbalanced,
and downright sensationalizing in painting a hero that can conceivably do no
wrong.
Harding, assailed on all
sides for being white trash; for being the
wrong vision
of feminine physicality; for being an overblown tabloid tale, Gillespie still shows us,
and underscores that Harding was a dedicated, talented athlete ---- her execution
of the triple axel amidst competition is rightly the stuff
of legend
and is shown here with the
right kind
of Silver Screen esprit.
Terrorists
and evil - doers around the world are at large, planning their secret evil plans to do evil things, but thankfully the world has Giorgio Bruno on its
side and his one - man cavalcade
of destruction will put all the
wrongs right again.