Sentences with phrase «side of the argument over»

He would bring in the lawyers on opposite sides of the argument over religious establishment and the question of driving religion from the public square.

«This legislation will hopefully be a wise compromise that satisfies both sides of the argument over a fee on plastic bags,» Sepulveda said.

There are benefits and drawbacks to both sides of the argument over whether to take a secured or unsecured loan, but the final decision comes down to answering two questions:

Not exact matches

Napster co-founder Sean Parker's proposal to sell first - run movies to home viewers at $ 50 a pop has stirred up various corners of Hollywood, with big movie studios and theater chains up in arms over the Screening Room idea while multiple major filmmakers have landed on opposing sides of the argument.

* But there is also a valid policy argument that companies that own both cable channels and cable wires have excessive power over pricing, and that blocking such a merger is a good use of anti-trust power — even if it's an argument you'd usually hear from the left side of the aisle.

The conservative politician who can listen to members of the other political coalition like Reagan did, and who can learn to respond to the arguments of the other side (as opposed to just posturing for the amusement of their own side), won't just win over those who currently think of themselves as swing - voters.

In my book — a bully is a bully is a bully and I will NEVER be won over to ANY side of an argument by being bullied.

At Wednesday's oral arguments, the court's conservative majority appeared to have the votes to allow the public prayers to continue in some form, but both sides expressed concerns about the level of judicial and government oversight over prayers presented by members of a particular faith.

Your position as the saver or spender will change issue to issue, but the point here is that each side is coming from a different foundation of financial values, and those core values feed the arguments over money rather than the money situation itself.

A developed argument about American exceptionalism and the nature of the American Founding would take us a long way toward understanding why we don't want religion to be pushed from the shared mainstream over to one side's shore.

Reilly apparently declines my invitation to set aside the quarrel over the American founding in view of present circumstances, though I wish he had taken more care to understand my side of that argument.

Can we all just remember this, the best way to convert someone to your argument is not to call them «stupid» or «idiot», its to engage in intelligent discussion over pros and cons of each side.

Earlier writers had recognized that Volkmar went too far in his attempted demonstration of Mark's dependence upon Paul — he found evidence of such dependence on almost every page of the Gospel — but his view was such a welcome relief from the one - sided Tübingen theory, according to which Mark was a «neutral» in the great apostolic controversy over Jewish Christianity, that the main thesis of Volkmar was accepted without careful scrutiny of his supporting arguments.

The proper argument is not an abstract debate over the size of government but a debate over how much government we want and need, whose side government is on and what interests government serves.

But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.

It's all these non-specific over simplifications of the other side's view points, that make arguments seem easily won.

On the far side of the older argument over the compatibility of Catholicism and democracy, this book seeks to convince us that the principles and practices of the free society are made necessary by Catholic teaching.

I can comprehend your side of the argument, titles per year is in question because he has had over a decade of not winning the title to lower the statistic you want.

During the Premier League win over Stoke City on Saturday, Walcott came up with more ammunition for both sides of the argument.

Obviously, there was a lot of hand - wringing over the 2 deadline deals (on both sides of the argument).

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

My basic argument is we should be trying to find a way of accommodating public concern over migration and to do it while remaining in the European Union... I still believe with a little bit of pragmatism on both sides it would be possible to reach [an agreement].»

The test now for both sides is which argument over the current two - year cycle will win: The Cuomo branded «Getting Things Done» in Albany versus the ideal of liberals holding power in the Trump era.

Sir Alan blamed NHS managers» arguments over how much they pay each other for treating patients from the other side of the border for the dispute.

Instead of focusing on the person who sends the abuse, an argument erupts over which side gets it worst and who is to blame.

There were heated arguments on the floor of Parliament today [Friday], from both sides of the chamber over a motion filed by the Minority Chief Whip, Muntaka Mubarak, for a special committee to be set up to investigate claims that the Trade Ministry extorted between $ 25,000 and $ 100,000 from expatriates to allow them sit close to the President during the Ghana...

There were heated arguments on the floor of Parliament today [Friday], from both sides of the chamber over a motion filed by the Minority Chief Whip, Muntaka Mubarak, for a special committee to be set up to investigate claims that the Trade Ministry extorted between $ 25,000 and $ 100,000 from expatriates to allow them sit close to the President during the Ghana Expatriates Business Awards held in the country.

Over the next few months this country is going to debate the merits of leaving or remaining in the European Union, and I have many colleagues whom I respect greatly on both sides of this argument.

When I invited him to the Oxford Union in 1979 there was a mix - up over which side of the motion he was speaking on, but he happily proposed the opposite argument to that which he believed.

Other allies who had previously voiced sympathy with the British line of argument — the Swedish and Dutch prime ministers — have peeled away to side with the majority over the past week, leaving Cameron unusually isolated.

Over pay, pensions, force numbers and, most recently, the system of local police accountability, the two are often on opposite sides of the argument.

In any argument over the dinner table, Pedro Bach - y - Rita «would always take the opposite side of the one he thought I would think.»

Yet argument raged on over details of Distler's proof and ultimately ended with neither side conceding.

Although the first tenet of the dioxin - based argument for vegetarianism, that dioxins are potent human carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, reproductive disruptors, and immune disruptors appears to be false or irrelevant to humans at the levels at which they are exposed, it is still sensible for us to err on the side of caution and, ceteris paribus (all things being equal), opt for a lower dioxin intake over a higher one.

I like to listen to both sides of an argument, look at the facts (not theories) from both sides and especially look at our evolutionary history to see what kinds of foods people all over the world have eaten for thousands, and hundreds of thousands, of years that sustain optimal health.

Set to be introduced in Civil War ahead of his own stand - alone film in 2018, Black Panther will show up as more of a neutral party in the conflict over the superhero - registering Sokovia Accords backed by Tony «Iron Man» Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) and resisted by Steve «Captain America» Rogers (Chris Evans), though he'll lean towards Tony's side of the argument.

Martin Ackley, spokesman for the Michigan Department of Education, is not taking sides in the argument over how the state data is being interpreted.

Landen and I ceremoniously partitioned the bedroom closet space, decided to share the sock drawer, then had an argument over who was to sleep on the wall side of the bed.

If there are unsettled disputes over certain accounts, you can include your side of the argument in the report.

its funny how everyone (not just here, but a good deal over at AVS too) who was in the hd - dvd boat all decided to migrate to the digital distribution side of the argument.

But arguments over the precise value of climate sensitivity duck the wider point, which is that even if we're lucky and climate sensitivity is on the low side of scientists» estimates, we're still heading for a substantial level of warming by the end of the century if greenhouse gas emissions aren't addressed, as the IPCC has highlighted.

The fact that «skeptics» make that argument over and over and over is a stain on the noble cause of skepticism (that said, no doubt the similar claim that disagreement = «diversion» can be found on the other side of the fence).

Maybe judith should go over there and insist that they stick to their guns, since she found their argument compelling earlier, without having bothered to look into Steig's side of the story.

I find this ironic given that you are presumably on the same side of the argument as Dan Kahan who is quoted as saying [T] here's good reason to believe that the self - righteous and contemptuous tone with which the «scientific consensus» point is typically advanced («assault on reason,» «the debate is over» etc.) deepens polarization.

As the argument degenerates on my side due to my increasing frustration at the ludicrous resistance I'm receiving from the RC person, they will refine their argument, move goalposts, argue over the precision and accuracy of my forecast, yabba on about how all orbital models of the inner solar system are wrong due to GIGO (which is rather ironic), and so forth.

Reflective of the tensions involved are the practical and constitutional arguments pressed with great vigor on both sides of the public debate over the power of the police to «stop and frisk» — as it is sometimes euphemistically termed — suspicious persons.

Over time, through loss after loss at the hands of lawyers on the other side, I also learned the value of legal writing — of crafting an argument to support my positions.

And those who also feel overwhelmed at the idea of making legal arguments similarly emphasize their despair over navigating procedure, completing documentation correctly, and dealing with the other side.

An unbiased mediator would preside over an informal presentation of each side's argument.

This was also back in the halcyon days (for the other side) of essentially unlimited plaintiff forum shopping pre-Bauman, so the specter existed that, if this argument succeeded, plaintiffs from all over the country, or even the world, would flock to West Virginia, and by the mere fact of their litigation tourism, thereby rid themselves of one of our side's most significant arguments.