Sentences with phrase «side of the conversation does»

Not exact matches

But what most outsiders don't understand (along with a lot of prospective hires on the other side of the conversation) is just how personally the entrepreneur takes the compensation negotiations.

What the president told Republicans, in other words, largely echoed the report's findings — and it makes perfect sense he would do so: killing the hype on both sides of the Keystone debate is the first step toward turning the conversation into a civilized exchange that can lead to compromise.

Another side of the Women Who Cowork conversation is that women work, collaborate, lead and run businesses differently than men do.

Not only did he want continuity at the Fed, but the president said he needed Summers by his side in the White House as he tried to lift the economy out of a deep recession, according to people familiar with the conversation.

If Tony were to respond in detail with his version of events, if EV leaders stepped in and rather inevitably started saying, «but Julie was or did X or Y,» and THAT's why I did Z... then suddenly the conversation is immersed in counter-accusations over the agony of a divorce, something that is rarely if ever simplistic and one - sided.

When we reduce this complex and important conversation to two «sides,» as though it were some kind of college football rivalry, we do such an injustice to the Bible, to Christian history, and to the millions upon millions of real people whose lives and whose futures we are discussing.

In the email conversation that you had with Christine, you were very clear that you did not see the new site as primarily a community but rather that you were selling access to a number of resources and the community portion was more of a side benefit.

I've done a TON of reading on both sides of the issue, I'm more than a little familiar with the talking points, and in a one - on - one conversation I'll tend to take the opposite side from whoever I talk to.

Each comes from a different impulse, as if the two sides of my mind don't agree with each other even though they are in conversation with each other.

Here's a few Mormon factoids (dem darn facts is really painful) 1) J. Smith was a convicted con - artist on numerous times (non-post Mormon cult creation) 2) He said God is 6» 2» living on the planet Kalob on the other side of the galaxy (at the time the extent of The Universe was believed to be the Milky Way Galaxy — and oh, how convienient it could not be proven otherwise at the time) 3) Science proved since E. Hubble there are billions of galaxies (did Smith's personal conversations with Jesus and God limit to a narrow Universe?)

But once you get passed that you know there's a practically side to breastfeeding and just making it part of your life and being able to live your life and do it and be able to care for your other kids and do it and I don't feel like that is discussed as much, so that's the whole point of our conversation today.

If we do delve into the negative side of the sustainability conversation, we do so carefully.

Doulas can, however, help facilitate conversation («Do you have any questions about the side effects of that medication?»)

We can have an unexpected conversation, see you do something cool / brave / impressive, discover a different side of your personality and — BAM — we see you in an entirely new light.

On my own side note, I went on an awesome first date with a really nice guy this weekend... and he called this morning and said he had been up most of the night thinking of me and our conversation and how he didn't want to mess things up with me or give me mixed signals and he said he knew it was really early on but he felt very strongly that we have a great connection and he wants us to be in a relationship!!

Tennis is a popular game, but do bear in mind that you'll be on opposite sides of a net — which isn't great for a conversation!

It will be of no use if the conversation is one sided and the lady does not feel involved.

One pro tip — if you do take the conversation into the steamier side of things, don't play your hand too soon.

And finally, the cutscenes and side conversations are too long and do little to build any kind of story or interest.

But these conversations are riveting, because they transport us back to an exotic age when editors and politicians didn't regard themselves as adversaries; they were all on the side of America.

The final feature is an audio commentary with director Lasse Hallestrom, who continues the trend of praising the film's Venetian location, but does so with many pauses throughout his one - sided conversation.

There's an entire thread elided from Hill's picture centred around violence in «old» Earth cartoons — a conversation that would have fit snugly in the mostly - animated Event Horizon, as it turns out, dealing as the movie does with the question of existential representation in a year, 1997 *, at the peak of our digital revolution, with The Fifth Element on the one side and a pinnacle (or nadir) of sorts, Titanic, on the other.

A conversation doesn't often meander from the life of ants to the Iranian nuclear negotiations, but Michael Douglas, newspapers scattered at his side, is busy these days selling a new Disney film and acting as an ambassador of sorts to promote Jewish...

Sometimes it doesn't bother me at all that iUniverse and Author Solutions (and now Penguin Books) have one - sided conversations with the world about how great they are, because there are plenty of customers willing to step up and talk about what it's really like to work with companies that habitually overcharge, under - deliver and make harassing sales calls.

As the self - publishing side of the business matures, the conversation seems to widen about what authors can expect to do on their own and what they need, if not a village at least a team for, as Ruffilo puts it.

The dog learns not by tightening real tight but a gentle pressure not to pinch or hurt dog, the rest of training after established collar is on is communicating with the prong, slight up / down motion... having a serious conversation with the prong collar is only necessary at extreme point, lunging to kill a dog or persons extreme and there is no treat or tone or action that stops dog already at a 10 then a calm leash correction and removing dog away from distraction to the other side of dogs thresh hold 6ft to across the street and repeat getting closer and of course treats and a «GOOD» is needed when a job well done Now, I also work with a Old English Bull Dog named Zoey who had to go 2 months to physical therapy for her knee she had surgery on a yr ago and I used a harness by Halti, they said no good, and a flat collar is no good on these kind of dogs.

I watched in awe and did my best to encourage every moment where a standard «attack line» from the purebred or rescue side was shot down by the other, and to steer the conversation back to the notion of how dogs are bought and sold — which is neutral territory in this particular war of words.

In discussing matters with MCV, I thought that some insider information would make them interested in the overall conversation, and such lip service did not stand on the side of truth.

The game is packed and filled to the rim with crazy conversations, meet - ups, characters, side quests and not to forget the way Volition uses music to get a point across, without spoiling anything you get some amazingly fitting music to some of the cut - scenes and the way they made fun of one of my most hated movies of all time, «Armageddon» just instantly made me laugh, and that never happens when I game, so well done Volition!

They took the idea of monologuing — a term used by individuals on the spectrum to express a one - sided conversation in which an individual focuses on something and doesn't interact with others — and designed a mock - up of a game that would allow individuals to forge connections with their peers.

You and I are on the same side and I agree with you pretty much, and after years of trying to have honest productive conversations about the problem and solutions, I spent years doing the same with ridicule and shaming of denying delayalists.

But to do so constructively requires some knowledge of accepted scientific facts on both sides, otherwise the conversation descends into a slanging match which amounts to no more than gainsaying what the other person said (to borrow from Monty Python) and, if you can't see that (some of) this is absolute tosh, then that's likely to happen.

It is set up to spark that conversation and open discussion of what the future will look like and what we can do to make the change a good one for humanity or for technology depending on what side you are on.

Our aim is to encourage as much worthwhile conversation as possible, and to do this we, like most blogs, err on the side of inclusiveness when it comes to commenters.

It's still early, but the company does have the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Facebook (ironic side note: both Gates and Mark Zuckerberg dropped out of college) but at the very least it's furthering the conversation about making higher education affordable again.

However, the problem is that Twitter conversations are muddying up the Tweet stream, more than RTs, of those folks who don't want to see one - sided conversations in their stream for which they're not a part.

Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle have done tremendous work to get us there, and we're hopeful this conversation continues.

There are definitely still pockets of the Richmond area that I don't want to spend a lot of time in in the middle of the night, but I think the positive side of this conversation is how much more in tune I became with my community.