I live on the other
side of the world so this did not make my news radar at the time.
Not exact matches
These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome
of litigation, including
so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any
of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components
of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence
of efficacy and adequacy
of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results
of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive
of real -
world results or
of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights
of third parties, or have unintended
side effects, adverse reactions or incidents
of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
These two Googlers wanted to show the
world what it's like working for the technology giant,
so they took advantage
of Google's 20 percent time policy (ergo the name), which allows employees to work on
side projects up to one day a week.
The device also has a 120 - degree wide - angle HD camera built in,
so you can see what's happening at home at the office, from across town, or on the other
side of the
world.
How is it possible for Tim to successfully manage a portfolio
of 15 rental properties on the other
side of the
world, when
so many investors struggle with just 1 property in their hometown?
So the active management industry is going to have to adapt, as are many
of the employees who work on this
side of the fund
world.
While his economic strategy was by no means
so one -
sided and simplistic as was commonly believed in the 1960s and»70s and although he still proclaimed industrialization and a «technical revolution» as his goals, Mao displayed continuing anxiety regarding the corrupting influence
of the fruits
of technical progress and an acute nostalgia for the perceived purity and egalitarianism that had marked the moral and political
world of the Jinggang Mountains and Yan» an eras.
Preston: [00:17:56]
So what's so interesting here is that on one side we have Silicon Valley working at a rapid pace to create this new digital cryptocurrency and we also have governments and global authorities looking into the implications of using the similar technology whether it's the IMF or other central banks around the world that are that are talking about using some form of crypto to back their monetary baselin
So what's
so interesting here is that on one side we have Silicon Valley working at a rapid pace to create this new digital cryptocurrency and we also have governments and global authorities looking into the implications of using the similar technology whether it's the IMF or other central banks around the world that are that are talking about using some form of crypto to back their monetary baselin
so interesting here is that on one
side we have Silicon Valley working at a rapid pace to create this new digital cryptocurrency and we also have governments and global authorities looking into the implications
of using the similar technology whether it's the IMF or other central banks around the
world that are that are talking about using some form
of crypto to back their monetary baseline.
So on the conservative estimate 99.5 % disagree with it's legalization and on the more liberal
side — 95 %
of the
world doesn't like the practice.
When we get close to the other
side our focus is directed toward God, and the things
of God, yet we are still here,
so the connection between this
world and the Everlasting becomes clear.
But it is through preaching that we get our marching orders, it is through preaching that the lost
world hears the gospel
so they can be transferred from the
side of the enemy and join our
side, the
side of our victorious Jesus Christ.
I've been on both
sides of this
so called debate and the atheist
side makes perfect sense in this natural
world.
When we find ourselves living as peacemakers in the
world, this kind
of living
so easily leads to persecution because we all know the way the
world works — it wants us to pick a
side, and it's not going to go down
so well when we don't pick a
side and want to see everyone flourish.
Unlike much
of the inherited tradition where God was conceived as either the retired, uninvolved clockmaker, or as
so perfect, eternal, unchanging that the
world had no impact on Godself, the process God has a receptive
side.
Within two and a half centuries, what began as a ragtag gang
of nobodies from the civilizational outback had
so transformed the Mediterranean
world that the most powerful man in that
world, the Roman emperor Constantine, joined the winning
side.
@@@@@ JEEZ yeah and ABRAHAM ISSAC YACOOB AND KING DAVID KING SOLOMON YAHSHUYAH MESSIAH APOSTLE PAUL JONAH where born and raised in Europe in the European Vatican eating pork drinking animal blood eating sunny
side running half cooked eggs with hotsauce and black truffles and eating shellfish yeah you people can't stand the truth and slavery never happen in USA and the black inventors
of USA stole every invention huh and the European Vatican stop the Transatlantic slave route trade too no where
so please explain too me WHY MY BLACK PEOPLE ALL OVER THE
WORLD when they have mixed children they all come out BLACK DNA don't lie VATICAN DO LIE
It's not just life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot
of beautiful things in this
world, but there is the uglier
side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that
so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»
so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any
of his work supports that)...
So is God actually «perfect»
So is God actually «perfect»?
I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief
of Scripture with that
of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the
world of all past injustices -
so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives
of «authority» -(which
side are you on, by the way, if you see the
world as
so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)
Yet from all
sides today modern knowledge
of the human creature and his
world is forcing us to face up to the finiteness
of human existence, to which, in
so many ways, Israel pioneered the road.
We want the unbelieving
world — at least that part
of it we care most about — to see that evangelicals really are on the righteous
side,
so that they just may entertain Christian faith themselves.
Though we live within a chasm
of derived ascertainment concluded as being a universe does in no way or means make causal admissions that there are unknowable amounts
of self - similar universes being
side by
side ours creating a gigantic life form living within a vast sea upon a
world so ginormous that our stellar
world would be 100,000 times smaller than a speck
of dust!
Consequently, radical empiricism fully conceived is not only an epistemological notion, but a pragmatic notion.3 (The pragmatic
side of this lesson has been overlearned by most
of today's neopragmatists, who are
so skeptical
of epistemological beginnings that they seem to treat knowledge as sheerly speculative and fasten to pragmatic tests to determine the viability
of a speculation in a
world that, for all they sometimes seem to know and care, is made only
of words and wild guesses about how words might be newly arranged.)
September 18 was misty but even
so it is easy to imagine figures on either
side looking out and recalling that as well as being the day
of the Scottish referendum it was also the centenary
of the Irish Home Rule law that was immediately suspended because
of the First
World War.
Neither
side is
so consistently related to America's position in the larger
world economy that its progress depends on the policies
of a particular administration.
Yeahright, from your
side of the
world this maybe
so, as I have said, those who have gained, or earned privileges in this
world may feel this way, but for those who have none, or are not able to get educated, or have sufficient finances that is needed in this society, drowning in imposed poverty from their living conditions, and exposed environments, unfortunately this is what their
world consists
of, and many innocent deaths happen just from poverty alone.
The weight
of the words
of the Lord can be heavy when you are in sin gay or straight Immoral men sin against their own body
so in some respects gays are harmless and have good
sides just like everyone else, the problem is again changing the
world to accept a lifestyle that is immoral.
A slightly later anonymous Life
of Boniface described how the Frisians «are wild and, just like fish, dwell among waters, by which they are surrounded on all
sides,
so that they rarely have access to the outside
world.
Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour
of the
world: In Adam all die even
so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words
of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are
of Christ: The false Christ comes up along
side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is
of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started
of in the truth, but went out from the Word
of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example
of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:
The reverse
side of this picture is that the interests
of the eternal
world, in
so far as they are identifiable with ecclesiastical practice and rule, have been steadily retreating.
And just as it is impossible in the physical
world to know with certainty why a drop
of water runs down the right hand
side of a knuckle instead
of the left hand
side,
so also, we can never know with absolute certainty why some bad things happen in this
world.
As this
world runs its course I see people * everywhere * getting *
so much * hotter and hotter under the collar defending their
side's «knowledge»
of the truth.
So... what's going on on the other
side of the
world?
I live in South Africa where we apparently don't have any flax meal...
so I imported some from your
side of the
world and can't wait to taste the results.
So sorry your on the other
side of the
world Fran... I'd love to hang out with someone who gets as excited as me over things like the endless possibilities
of beans.
So in 1994, Ford's went to their first International Fancy Food Show as a seller on the other
side of the aisle, debuting Bone Suckin» Sauce to 50,000 buyers around the
world.
Leander Kritikos, director at Procos comments: «We wanted to develop something completely unique in the
world of shopping bags,
so we're really excited to introduce a genuine alternative to the classic rectangular,
side - folding base construction.
It's
so neat to see those cakes and the book in your kitchen all the way on the other
side of the
world I feel very honored.
With one goal and nine assists
so far this season, Silva remains one
of the very best creative players in
world football, and has been instrumental for Guardiola's
side and their stylish brand
of football this term.
I'm sure Wenger would love to get one right from that
side of the
world, he doesn't buy too many but they all failed
so far.
This was before Mackey had won a single Iditarod, let alone four straight; before he used what he calls his marathon style — catnapping as his sled moves and covering 100 - mile chunks at a moderate pace without prolonged rest, instead
of sprinting from rest stop to rest stop like most other racers — to win an unprecedented double (the Yukon Quest, the
world's other 1,000 - mile dogsled race, and just weeks later the Iditarod) not once but twice; before he became
so dominant that slower competitors complained they had no chance to finish within five days
of him (the requirement for an official place and a commemorative belt buckle); and before a rival pushed for drug testing at the 2010 Iditarod, suspecting that Mackey's secret was his prescription for medical marijuana to alleviate the
side effects
of cancer treatment.
Van Gaal has opted to use the 3 -5-2 system that was
so effectively employed by his Netherlands
side at the
World Cup since he took over at Old Trafford, with Red Devils stars Daley Blind and Robin Van Persie thriving particularly in the 5 - 1 victory over Spain, but it has not been quite as effective in the Premier League and United's best winning run this season actually came in the midst
of a brief switch to a 4 -4-2 diamond system.
Meanwhile, this is arguably Guardiola's toughest test to date, as although he'll have plenty
of money to throw at City's problems, he hasn't been forced to pick up the pieces at a
side that have fallen
so far below expectations without
world - class collective talent at his disposal in a league that ultimately one
of two teams can win.
He inherited a fantastic
side at Barcelona, he had Messi at his disposal (who will probably go down as the greatest player ever, and guarantee's you a goal a game), Pep also had a lot
of other
world class players that were
so in tune which each others game, he had lots
of money to spend, and Real and Barcelona were miles ahead
of any else in the Spanish league in terms
of quality players and finances.
What really galls me is that Wenger gets paid 8 million a year to manage a
side and yet even the lowest paid bin man who is an arsenal fan can see that OG and Theo are NOT nor will they EVER be up to scratch un yet Wenger persisits against all the evidence because he
so desperately wants to prove the
world wrong about either or both
of the afore mentioned.
nice to see you crawl out
of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do
so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts
of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or
world - class players into the fold without being fearful
of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal
of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead
of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to
side with management and in doing
so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a
world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier,
so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow
On the other
side of the coin, Wenger as a manger looks clueless to manage
so many
world class central MFs at the moment.
24 year old winger Jarvis has had a good season and a half, his first in the Premier League after four seasons with Gillingham and two with Wolves in the Championship, and whilst the pint sized wide man would not be considered a spectacular signing there is no doubting his potential and a number
of top
sides are said to be tracking the Middlesbrough born youngster who was
of course part
of Fabio Capello's original 30 man squad for the
World Cup
so is clearly someone who is rated highly.
Australia is the other
side of the
world with time differences,
so we shall know more on Tuesday Morning or
so.
For a striker that has over 100 caps and nearly 50 goals for one
of the best international
sides in the
world, and a very good strike rate for Arsenal when he does get on the pitch, it must be hard to understand why Arsene Wenger
so rarely calls upon his talents in front
of goal, or brings him with no time to influence a game.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd,
so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through
so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right
side wing - back
so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks
so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone
so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London,
so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some
world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence...
so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this
side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits