Sentences with phrase «side of this issue do»

It's hard to know what to do, and just discouraging that even the people we would hope are on the right side of this issue don't seem to get it yet, as we watch Wilkins crumble.

Not exact matches

Stumpf said there were no product sales goals in the small - business - lending side of Wells, but he would not guarantee that similar issues did not happen in small business.

The SBA reports that banks have come down on both sides of the issue; according to the agency, «several lenders stated that they do not finance goodwill on a conventional basis.»

Strike Debt doesn't buy individual debtor's debts, but instead buys bundles of anonymous debt from banks through what it says are friends on the debt broker side (apparently, the banks won't deal with anyone who isn't established, and most brokers won't sell to non-collections agencies because of liability issues).

«The other side of the coin,» added Vasileff, «is the minutiae - driven people,» who obsess over issues and tasks that don't really contribute to their emotional or financial well - being.

And you don't have to take a side on the use of oilsands in general to regret an attempt to hinder, rather than foster, public clarity about an important issue.

For starters, you can use it as a way to list the pros and cons of each side of an argument, much in the same way that ProCon.org does for major and controversial political issues (see my example below).

While most of the foregoing bills are at an early stage, and do not comprehensively regulate virtual currency or blockchain technology, it is encouraging that legislators on both sides of the aisle are increasing their focus on issues relating to this technology.

Without clear leadership, Republicans were outwardly divided over what to do next, as their offices are being flooded with calls on both sides of the issue.

If our device could be moved close to where it is needed, but still on the energy producer's side of that equation, yet just outside the meter, then the energy producers could have millions of these small devices that they own and operate, because grandma doesn't want to become her own utility company because she has a solar panel, but if the utility companies and energy providers could compete with each other to have small units that are so close to the loads, they still get the full advantage of being a supplier of energy, except with just millions of little plants, they can avoid needing transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, et cetera, that everybody is talking about being expensive, unreliable, and subject to issues.

Forget the specifics, for a paragraph, because this is a notable development: while these hearings usually devolve into partisan cliches with the same talking points — Democrats want regulations, and Republicans don't — yesterday Senators from both sides of the aisle expressed unease with Facebook's handling of private data; obviously Democrats tried to tie the issue to the last election, but that made the Republicans» shared concern all - the - more striking.

«We recommend that foreign companies don't allow themselves to be an instrument of issues that surpass their limits and strength, by trusting the Greek Cypriot side,» Erdogan said.

Investors willing to do a little more analysis, however, will quickly see that both are facing external issues that could have a material impact on their business outlooks for years to come, which is why most investors should err on the side of caution with this pair.

Not exactly, though «America» from the 1957 musical West Side Story does deal with many of the relevant issues — debt, Puerto Rico's relative impoverishment vis - a-vis the United States, the possibility of mass emigration, and the island's oft - misunderstood political relationship with the mainland United States.

I think your position is the position of most pro-choice supporters, my issue with the religious pro-life side is they do not want to support the very things that have been shown to have to largest impact on reducing abortion, s.e.x education and contraception.

The pro-gay marriage side suggests anyone that does not agree with their side of this controversial issue is bigoted, biased, uneducated, and anti-diversity.

Do not poison others with your condescending comments... and this goes for BOTH sides of the issue.

I don't care what side of the issue you're on, how it is OK to drag your kid out to protests like this?

The underlying fundemental philosophy that shades one's particular side of this issue is: Either you're personally OK with paying your taxes to help the poor OR you don't want to pay to help the poor... it's that simple.

Does she take a side on EVERY issue, regardless of her understanding of its subtleties?

In examining each of these issues (and more) Wittmer steers a path between the extremes of both sides, as he puts it «conservatives fear that postmoderns don't care enough about doctrine, and postmoderns think that conservatives don't care enough about people.

All sides of this issue could to learn to respect one another, even if they don't agree with the actions, beliefs, or practices of the other.

Clearly my bias is showing, and there's obviously a lot more nuance to both partiest, the main issue though is that parties can be hijacked and have been on both sides which leaves the large majority of moderates voting for the lesser of two evils and hoping that the candidate that they vote for will drop the pandering they did to the fringe and go moderate.

The debate over abortion (most recently focused on what are called either «late - term» or «partial - birth «abortions, depending on your position) reveals a reluctance to look at the facts surrounding both sides of a serious issue out of fear that one might discover or publicize a fact that does not support one's stance.

The word «doing» points to the active side of subjective experience and to the bodily actions that issue from that active side.

But before I did, I decided to discuss the issue with several medical professionals, some of whom are on the «pro-life» side and others of whom are on the «pro-choice» side, including a handful of abortion providers.

But foreign policy, of course, is largely a matter of prudence, and there are and should be good Catholics on both sides of issues such as what to do about Iran's nuclear ambitions.

When has Graham, who is on the wrong side of every social issue, ever done anything that wasn't self - serviving?

For each side, these are important life and death issues that most of us do not want treated in a cavalier fashion, and you come off that way consistently, intentional or not.

After all, if all these smarter - than - me theologians, theorists, academics, scholars, thinkers, and leaders on both sides of the issue haven't been able to put the debate to rest, what chance does a slim yellow book by a happy - clappy Canadian mama - writer have?

'' - If someone upon investigation of the two sides of the issue determines that they do nt personally believe one or both was part of the original text, removing them does not change Christian doctrine one iota.»

Here's to hoping you return to the logic that you claim to uphold so that regardless of which side of the issue you fall you will still do your argument justice.

I don't think of Alise's belief as denial so much as a difference of opinion, akin to taking opposite sides on a political issue.

Tony Robinson, Bishop of Wakefield and chairman of traditionalist Anglican group Forward in Faith told Premier the appointment was inevitable, but hopes Bishop Sarah will do well in respecting people on both sides of the issue.

I've done a TON of reading on both sides of the issue, I'm more than a little familiar with the talking points, and in a one - on - one conversation I'll tend to take the opposite side from whoever I talk to.

Don't you wish to know other sides of the issue?

It doesn't matter many prejudice church's are on the wrong side of this issue.

Unfortunately, the drama of Ted's ideas and psychological issues doesn't mesh well with the drama on the «manhunt» side of things.

When those who have won the day on this issue (and by «the day» I mean every denominational vote on the issue since 1972) and are gaining more and more power in the denomination offer the possibility of a just separation, why do those who claim to be on the side of the oppressed want to maintain the oppressive status quo?

Black acceptance in our country took too long, don't be on the bigoted side of this issue given the discriminatory history of blacks in America.

I do nt have a problem with other religions, I think people on both sides of the issue need work together and talk about this.

In doing so, I have suggested that without a truly open marketplace of ideas, without a mass media environment in which all sides of issues are freely and openly discussed, we can not have a workable democracy.

In previous chapters I have suggested what concerned citizens can do to deal with television without censorship: create local television councils and community action to get stations to accept their responsibility for the public welfare; introduce media education courses in the schools and churches to create media literacy; organize community groups to develop programs relating to community issues on the «narrowcast» media of cable - TV, videocassettes, low - power TV, public - broadcasting facilities, and commercial side - band channels; employ stockholder action and other economic measures.

Granted, the Fairness Doctrine has to do with the FCC ensuring that public broadcasts show both sides of controversial issues, but it's easy to see the hypocrisy where you argue against forcing a company to show both sides of an issue and then you argue for it!

So anyway, maybe it is just normal in theological debate for everyone on all sides of an issue to think that the opponents «simply don't understand» (After all, if they understood, they would agree!).

I don't know if I mentioned it last time, but I did have the issue of them being a bit on the dry side when I first made them.

The only thing that might be an issue for some is they are on the fudgy creamy side of the brownie spectrum and don't have the cake / crumble that some people love about brownies.

Baseball owners have plenty of issues we can (and do) side - eye them for, but at least Crane and Co. were thinking of the city their team calls home on this issue.

I'm cautiously optimistic that they're going to not only get the big stuff done and avoid a lockout, but also address a bunch of these side issues that have been neglected for so long.

I would like to see a player come in who can do the job of a Right sided AM consistantly, Ox can step up as well as Gnabry but neither one can be expected as both have had injurie issues recently.