Sentences with phrase «side protection in»

Just 15 vehicles qualify for the Top Safety Pick + award from IIHS after the requirements were strengthened to include good - rated headlights and good or acceptable passenger - side protection in small overlap front crashes.

When the Institute first rated small SUVs for side protection in 2003, the Subaru model performed the best and was one of only two to earn a good rating (see Status Report special issue: side impact crashworthiness, June 28, 2003).

Not exact matches

In a rare move for the pro-mining Barnett government, environment minister Albert Jacob has sided with the Environmental Protection Authority and rejected appeals by Canadian company Cameco over its proposed Yeelirrie uranium mine in the GoldfieldIn a rare move for the pro-mining Barnett government, environment minister Albert Jacob has sided with the Environmental Protection Authority and rejected appeals by Canadian company Cameco over its proposed Yeelirrie uranium mine in the Goldfieldin the Goldfields.

In fact, North American business interests have sought to weaken a key NAFTA side accord on environmental protections and enforcement.

In August, the same judge sided with 13 Republican - controlled states to block transgender protections in public schools sought by the Obama administratioIn August, the same judge sided with 13 Republican - controlled states to block transgender protections in public schools sought by the Obama administratioin public schools sought by the Obama administration.

Here are the findings, listed in this order: vehicle model, driver's side protection rating, passenger's side protection rating.

Mueller said the difference in protection between drivers and passengers was due in part to some automakers placing a greater emphasis on the vehicle frame and structure for the driver's side of the SUV.

These frameworks were designed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the European Commission and Swiss Administration to provide companies on both sides of the Atlantic with a mechanism to comply with data protection requirements when transferring personal data from the European Union and Switzerland to the United States in support of transatlantic commerce.

It also needs to incorporate the environmental and labor protections that are in side agreements.

Assuming there is actually willingness to try to mend rather than end NAFTA, copyright term extension and criminalizing the circumvention of TPMs (technological protection measures) for commercial purposes will certainly be key demands presented by the US side in the NAFTA negotiations.

ok i've decided — after soul searching and observing my and other's reactions to these religious blog news on CNN learning more about religion from this alone and about the mideast than from anywhere else in my USA educated life i need to be more tolerant of others having religious based governments THAT is what is confusing me — that religion are governments are not seperated that is hard for much of USA population to understand perhaps it is for me i think you would have to actually live in a society like the mideast to truly understand it i mean — actually be part of the society the religious part is truly offputting — since most in USA seperate church and state like — church is for faith and imagination and celebration and family and community involvement and state is for protection and education and health and infrastructure, etc., for all it is hard to be serious about religion — when the serious side of society is state it is hard to see religion being the serious side of enforcement — and the state enforcing the faith based side of society egad — doesn't god get lost in all that?

The day following the one - sided vote in Dallas on the «Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People» (there were only thirteen nays), the New York Times expressed satisfaction in an editorial titled «Seeking Atonement in Dallas.»

But the press has special protection because it is expected to clarify, to set in context, to suggest alternatives, to seek out informed expressions and viewpoints on all sides, in other words, to help develop Madison's informed electorate.

Advocates of the Fairness for All approach argue that evangelicals and other faith groups end up with greater protections when actively involved in crafting legislation; if left up to the courts to weigh the rights of either side, Christian - run institutions and businesses — from churches to bakers — risk more severe restrictions.

Our rotated defence will have the extra protection of tweo holding midfielders in the absence of Coquelin at least, with Wenger going for Arteta and Flamini as a double pivot and it looks like Aaron Ramsey will be our number 10, with the Ox and Joel Campbell on either side of Olivier Giroud in attack.

Playing in a back three significantly benefitted him, offering him protection on either side as well as a licence to move forward with the ball and showcase his other qualities.

Mertesacker is needs protection and players around him and Wenger put on a ultra attacking side and there is no harm done only frustration which has now given the side to put up a performance in the next remaining matches with quality and proper care.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

He said, «He made a huge difference to them, results improved dramatically [when he came into the side], and he gave them that protection in front of the back four.

The defence should be getting used to playing the new system and each other by now and there is good protection in front of them and hopefully a focused Ospina behind them, so with our firepower and the respective forms of the two sides this has to be an Arsenal win right?

I feel that to some extent that Ryan Mason and Nabil Bentaleb can provide this protection in front of the defence, but they do not carry that physical presence that maybe Etienne Capoue may bring to the side.

Britax has just released a new car seat that keeps children in a five - point harness longer, as well as converts into a booster, including side impact protection that doubles as a nice resting place for sleepy heads.

Considering falls are largely to blame for the injuries found in the study, those rails and sides really don't offer your babies much protection.

The real concern however is that a booster seat offers no protection for a child if the car they are travelling in is involved in a side - impact crash.

It's rigorously tested for safety (it has two times the... MORE federal standard for side - impact protection) and has energy - absorbing padding to absorb the impact in case of an accident.

For better protection in the event of a side impact collision, the side wings of the Pebble Plus have an impact - absorbing material inside.

federal standard for side - impact protection) and has energy - absorbing padding to absorb the impact in case of an accident.

For side impact protection, the Rainier is padded in energy - absorbing EPS foam, and the additional inch width that the top of the Rainier has over the Radian allows for thicker head protection as well as new extra deep side walls with a rigid double wall design.

Stable side pads, extra backing foam padding in the hip and head areas, fixed armrests, special crash ventilation fins and side bolsters provide side impact protection.

Recaro's range of highback booster seats provide excellent side impact protection and their sporty looks and great features like in - built speakers will be a hit with the kids.

Privia is a protective and comfortable seat for your newborn with Advanced Side Protection increasing the protection in the case of a side impact collisSide Protection increasing the protection in the case of a side impact Protection increasing the protection in the case of a side impact protection in the case of a side impact collisside impact collision.

The large side padding, will not only keep your child comfortable but the lateral energy absorbers reduce force in the event of a crash and protective foam in the hip, shoulder and head areas provide advanced side impact protection.

It is as safe as they come with Side Impact Protection, 4 harness heights and well padded to ensure that your baby rides in comfort.

This is another safe convertible car seat that holds safety in high regard thanks to its bonus safety features such as that extra layer of side impact protection, the strong steel frame, and the harness clicks that happen when you have adjusted the straps to the ideal rightness.

The Foonf adds side impact protection in an energy - absorbing, foam - lined headrest connected to the frame via steel rods, and in rear - facing mode there's a steel anti-rebound bar... MORE that limits rotation of the seat.

Extra backing foam padding in the hip and head areas, fixed armrests, special crash ventilation fins and side bolsters provide side impact protection.

It also features an Integrated Linear Side Impact Protection System that uses the L.S.P. system protectors which fold out on the side facing the door, to reduce the force of a side impact collision in its early staSide Impact Protection System that uses the L.S.P. system protectors which fold out on the side facing the door, to reduce the force of a side impact collision in its early staside facing the door, to reduce the force of a side impact collision in its early staside impact collision in its early stages.

The car seat that comes with the Eddie Bauer TriTrek Travel System is worth the price alone because of the side impact protection it offers for your little one in case of an accident.

It offers additional side impact protection and a rear - facing tether, plus convenience features such as the built - in lockoffs and better - than - average LATCh connectors that may help more parents install the car seat correctly.

However, the steel frame and side impact protection makes up a big portion of its size, so if the seat will stay in one vehicle most of the time, this is a great option.

No need to worry when the car is in motion either because the car seat features side impact protection which works to absorb energy in case of in impact.

It abuts the existing sanctuary on three sides, and is ranked in the highest priority for acquisition in the sanctuary's land protection plan.

SafeCell Impact Protection surrounds your little one in safety and Side Impact Protection formed by a deep energy - absorbing shell, shields your child from the most severe type of collision.

If you're traveling with a toddler that has recently transitioned to a toddler or twin bed, it may be a bit tricky to put them in a twin bed with no side protection.

This feature works in conjunction with the other safety innovations from Britax, including an Impact - Absorbing Base with SafeCell Technology and two layers of side impact protection on the seat shell, decreasing the risk of injury and fatality.

The Axkid Side Impact Protection provide extra protection in the event of a side collision and can be removed when not requiSide Impact Protection provide extra protection in the event of a side collision and can be removed when notProtection provide extra protection in the event of a side collision and can be removed when notprotection in the event of a side collision and can be removed when not requiside collision and can be removed when not required.

The side impact protection is found in 6 different positions, improving the safety for babies at any stage of their growth.

The Rebl Plus comes equipped with Nuna's smart Side Impact Protection System that offers all - over protection in the event of a side - on collision, and features energy absorbing fSide Impact Protection System that offers all - over protection in the event of a side - on collision, and features energy absorProtection System that offers all - over protection in the event of a side - on collision, and features energy absorprotection in the event of a side - on collision, and features energy absorbing fside - on collision, and features energy absorbing foam.

It comes equipped with anti-slip harness pads for high restraint performance in case of frontal impacts, as well as an excellent Side Impact Protection System for the best head and neck protection, plus an A.S.B System (Automatic Safety Belt) that keeps connection between the seat and its base, eProtection System for the best head and neck protection, plus an A.S.B System (Automatic Safety Belt) that keeps connection between the seat and its base, eprotection, plus an A.S.B System (Automatic Safety Belt) that keeps connection between the seat and its base, every time.

As well as Side Impact Protection technology and an energy absorbing shell, it features a pioneering «ER - Tech» System which slides the headrest down in the event of a head on collision, to reduce the force impacted on the head and neck.